Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research

Qualitative Health Research - Tập 16 Số 3 - Trang 377-394 - 2006
Tracy Farmer1, Kerry Robinson2, Susan J. Elliott3, John Eyles4
1Canadian Heart Health Dissemination Project at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
2Canadian Heart Health Dissemination Project at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
3School of Geography and Earth Sciences; McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
4School of Geography and Earth Sciences at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Tóm tắt

In this article, the authors present an empirical example of triangulation in qualitative health research. The Canadian Heart Health Dissemination Project (CHHDP) involves a national examination of capacity building and dissemination undertaken within a series of provincial dissemination projects. The Project's focus is on the context, processes, and impacts of health promotion capacity building and dissemination. The authors collected qualitative data within a parallel–case study design using key informant interviews as well as document analysis. Given the range of qualitative data sets used, it is essential to triangulate the data to address completeness, convergence, and dissonance of key themes. Although one finds no shortage of admonitions in the literature that it must be done, there is little guidance with respect to operationalizing a triangulation process. Consequently, the authors are feeling their way through the process, using this opportunity to develop, implement, and reflect on a triangulation protocol.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/0192512199204006

10.1108/00251740110391448

10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00371.x

10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.15217.x

10.1007/BF00145701

10.1037/h0046016

Creswell, J. W., 2003, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2

10.1111/1467-9256.00138

10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00102-2

Denzin, N. K., 1978, The research act: Atheoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2

10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010183.x

10.1177/1090198103030003003

10.1023/A:1004249313062

10.4135/9781412984775

10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x

10.1177/0539018402041001001

10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00036-7

10.1191/1463423603pc173oa

10.4135/9781483349015.n26

10.1023/A:1026447822732

10.1136/bmj.325.7357.210

10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50

10.1023/A:1014984232147

Miles, M. B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis, 2

Morse, J. M., 1994, Critical issues in qualitative research methods, 1

Murray, J. S., 1999, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 16, 194

10.1177/1090198103255521

National Institutes of Health, 1999, Qualitative methods in health research: Opportunities and considerations in application and review

10.4135/9781412985017

Patton, M. Q., 2002, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3

10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00269.x

Sharp, H. O., 1943, Photogrammetry, 3

10.1093/bjsw/31.6.863

10.1016/S0020-7489(98)00014-5

Smaling, A., 1987, Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek [Methodological objectivity and qualitative research]

10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x

10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00035-X

10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00221-4

Weiss, C. H., 1998, Evaluation, 2

10.1111/1467-8306.9302011