Developing and Evaluating Criteria to Help Reviewers of Biomedical Informatics Manuscripts
Tài liệu tham khảo
Pons Collins Dictionary of the English Language. Glasgow: HarperCollins, 1998.
de Vries J . Peer review: the holy cow of science. In: Fredriksson E (ed). A Century of Science Publishing Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001, pp 231–44.
10.1136/bmj.314.7079.498
van Bemmel J McCray A . Yearbook of Medical Informatics (annual edition). Stuttgart: Schattauer, 1992 –2000.
Haux R Kulikowski C . Yearbook of Medical Informatics (annual edition). Stuttgart: Schattauer, since 2001.
Ammenwerth E Knaup P Maier C . Digital libraries and recent medical informatics research—Findings from the IMIA yearbook of medical informatics 2001. Methods Inf Med 2001;40:163–7.
Gunn IP . Evidence-based practice, research, peer review, and publication. CRNA (clinical forum for nurse anesthetists) 1998;9:177–82.
10.1016/S0010-4825(98)00037-7
10.1348/014466599162782
10.1001/jama.280.3.275
10.1001/jama.1997.03540350077040
DFG. German Research Association: Proposals for safeguarding good scientific practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 1998.
BMJ. Checklist for editors and peer reviewers. <http://bmj.com/advice/>. Accessed October 2002.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Instructions for authors. <http://www.jamia.org/misc/ifora.shtml> Accessed October 2002.
10.1055/s-2000-7567
10.12968/hosp.2001.62.3.2392
Kulikowski C Ammenwerth E Bohne A . Medical imaging informatics and medical informatics: opportunities and constraints—findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2002. Methods Inf Med 2002;41:183–9.
Methods of Information in Medicine. Instructions for authors. Accessed October 2002. <http://www.schattauer.de/zs/startz.asp?load=/zs/methods/richtl.asp>.