Developing Ourselves as Police Leaders: How Can We Inquire Collaboratively in a Hierarchical Organization?

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 15 - Trang 191-206 - 2002
Geoff Mead1
1National Police Training, Hook, Hants

Tóm tắt

This paper gives a practical account of a recent 18-month long action inquiry project, in which the author facilitated (and co-inquired with) a mixed group of police managers with the intention of improving our own leadership practices. Six phases of the inquiry are identified—doing the groundwork, getting the group together, creating a safe environment, sustaining the inquiry, accounting for the learning, and bridging the gaps. It is argued that such forms of collaborative inquiry are particularly well suited to addressing the uniquely complex phenomenon of leadership, and some tangible benefits for members of the project and for the organization as a whole are identified. Particular attention is paid to the politics and practicalities of doing collaborative inquiry in an overtly hierarchical organization, concluding that action inquiry must be crafted to its particular circumstances and context to realize its considerable potential to help us improve both individual practice and organizational performance.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bennis, W. (1989). Why Leaders Can't Lead, Jossey Bass, San Francisco. Claxton, G. (1997). Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind, Fourth Estate, London. Coghlan, D., and T. Brannick (2001). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, Sage, London. Harrison, R. (1983). Strategies for a new age. Human Resource Manage. 22(3), 209-235. Heron, J. (1992). Feeling and Personhood, Sage, London. Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry, Sage, London. Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London, pp. 91-102. MacLure, M. (1996). Telling transitions; boundary work in narratives of becoming an action researcher. Brit. Edu. Res.J. 22(3), 273-286. Mead, G. (1988). Organization culture. Federal Bureau of Investigation Manage. Quart. 8(4), 1-5. Mead, G. (1990). The challenge of police leadership: The contribution of the special course. Manage. Educ. Develop. 21(5), 406-414. Mead, G. (1995). Millennium management for a new age police service. Policing Today 1(5), 4-7. Meyerson, D. E., and M. A. Scully (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and courage. Organi. Sci. 6(5), 585-600. Pedler, M. (1981). Developing the learning community. In Boydell T., and Pedler, M. (eds.), Management Self-Development: Concepts and Practices, Gower, Farnborough, pp. 68-84. Reason, P., (ed.). (1988). Human Inquiry in Action. Sage, London. Reason, P. (ed.). (1994). Participation in Human Inquiry, Sage, London. Reason, P., and Bradbury, H., (eds). (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London. Reason, P., and Rowan, J., (eds). (1981). Human Inquiry. Wiley, Chichester. Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York. Storm, H. (1972). Seven Arrows. Ballantine Books, New York. Torbert, W. R. (1991). The Power of Balance, Sage, Newbury Park, California. Torbert, W. R. (2001). The practice of action inquiry. In Reason P., and Bradbury H., (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London, pp. 250-260. Whitehead, J. (1993). The Growth of Educational Knowledge: Creating Your Own Living Educational Theories, Hyde Publ., Bournemouth.