Develop a cost model to evaluate the economic benefit of remanufacturing based on specific technique
Tóm tắt
Remanufacturing is a process of recovering used products to a like-new condition. It can potentially achieve considerable economic, environmental and social benefits in many applications. However, its economic benefit varies for different products and remanufacturing processes. This research aims to develop a framework and cost model to quantitatively evaluate the benefits of remanufacturing techniques to assist the decision making on end-of-life strategies. Additive manufacturing-based remanufacturing process has been modelled first, then cost breakdown structure for the process has been created, and the cost model has been developed. Validation of the cost model has been conducted based on expert judgement, and a case study has been carried out by using the developed cost model to compare the benefit of remanufacturing a specified component or making a new one.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Lund RT: Remanufacturing: the experience of the United States and implications for developing countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C; 1984.
Dunmade I: PLETS model: a sustainability-concept-based approach to product end-of-life management. Proc. SPIE 5583 Environ. Conscious. Manufact. IV 2004., 118: doi:10.1117/12.569629
Bufardi A, Sakara D, Gheorghe R, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P: Multiple criteria decision aid for selecting the best product end of life scenario. Int. J. Comp. Integr. Manufact. 16 2003,7(8):526–534.
Jun HB, Cusin M, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P: A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for EOL product recovery optimization: turbocharger case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007,45(18–19):4573–4594.
Fernández I, Puente J, García N, Gómez A: A decision-making support system on a products recovery management framework: a fuzzy approach. Concurr. Eng. 2008,16(2):129–138. 10.1177/1063293X08092486
Iakovou E, Moussiopoulos N, Xanthopoulos A, Achillas C, Michailidis N, Chatzipanagioti M, Koroneos C, Bouzakis K, Kikis V: A methodological framework for end-of-life management of electronic products. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2009,53(6):329–339. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.02.001
Ghazalli Z, Murata A: Development of an AHP-CBR evaluation system for remanufacturing: end-of-life selection strategy. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2011,4(1):2–15. 10.1080/19397038.2010.528848
Jiang Z, Zhang H, Sutherland JW: Development of multi-criteria decision making model for remanufacturing technology portfolio selection. J. Clean. Prod. 2011,19(17):1939–1945.
Chen J-M, Chang CI: The economics of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 2011,63(10):1323–1335.
Sutherland JW, Jenkins TL, Haapala KR: Development of a cost model and its application in determining optimal size of a diesel engine remanufacturing facility. CIRP. Annals-Manufact. Technol. 2010,59(1):49–5. 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.050
Azadivar F, Ordoobadi S: A simulation model to justify remanufacturing policies. Proceedings of the IEEE Simulation Conference 2010 Winter, Baltimore, MD; 1592–1600. doi:10.1109/WSC.2010.5678909
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): NASA Cost Estimating Handbook. NASA Headquarters, Cost Analysis Division, Washington, DC; 2008.
Niazi A, Dai J, Seneviratne L, Balabani S: Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2006,128(2):563–575. 10.1115/1.2137750
Hajare AD: Parametric Costing—Steel Wire Mill. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Wire Association International, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; 1998:172–178.
Cavalieri S, Maccarrone P, Pinto R: Parametric vs. neural network models for the estimation of production costs: a case study in the automotive industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004,91(2):165–177. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.005
Curran R, Raghunathan S, Price M: Review of aerospace engineering cost modeling: the genetic causal approach. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2004,40(8):487–534. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.10.001
Langmaak S, Wiseall S, Bru C, Adkins R, Scanlan J, Sóbester A: An activity-based-parametric hybrid cost model to estimate the unit cost of a novel gas turbine component. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2013,142(1):74–88. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.020
Jung JY: Manufacturing cost estimation for machined parts based on manufacturing features. J. Intell. Manuf. 2002,13(4):227–238. 10.1023/A:1016092808320
Kiritsis D, Neuendorf KP, Xirouchakis P: Petri Net techniques for process planning cost estimation. Adv. Eng. Software. 1999, 30: 375–387. 10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00126-4
Xu Y, Elgh F, Erkoyuncu JA, Bankole O, Goh Y, Cheung W, Baguley P, Wang Q, Arundachawat P, Shehab E, Newnes L, Roy R: Cost engineering for manufacturing: current and future research. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2011,25(4–5):300–314. iFirst article
Xu Y, Roy R, Cassaro G, Ramsden J: Development of a cost estimating framework for nanotechnology based products. Proceedings of the 16th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, Taibei, Taiwan; 2009:193–201.
Xu Y, Wang J, Tan X, Curran R, Raghunathan S, Doherty J, Gore D: Manufacturing cost modeling for aircraft wing. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR08, Brunel University; 817–824.
Wei Y, Egbelu P: A framework for estimating manufacturing cost from geometric design data. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2000,13(1):50–63. 10.1080/095119200130054
What is MECE, and is it MECE?. . Accessed 12th August 2011 http://timvangelder.com/2010/06/04/what-is-mece-and-is-it-mece/
Falvey T: A9 Dragonfly: composite leading edge slats designer and Cg, mass and inertia manager. Cranfield University, MSc thesis; 2010.