Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Vai trò then chốt của Đức trong các mối quan hệ xuyên Đại Tây Dương
Tóm tắt
Đức có một vai trò và trách nhiệm đặc biệt trong tương lai thành công của liên minh xuyên Đại Tây Dương do vị trí địa lý, kích thước chính trị và kinh tế của mình cũng như tầm quan trọng trong EU. Điều này cho phép Đức tích cực tham gia vào việc giải quyết các vấn đề xuyên Đại Tây Dương, tạo ra không gian ngoại giao trong liên minh NATO và chủ động hình thành chính sách xuyên Đại Tây Dương, thay vì chỉ nghiêm túc nhắc lại tầm quan trọng trung tâm của liên minh. Vị thế then chốt này (chìa khóa) sẽ được thảo luận tiếp theo qua hai phạm trù chủ đề (NATO/Afghanistan và Nga).
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adamski, J., Johnson, M. T., & Schweiss, C. (Hrsg.). (2006).Old Europe, new security: Evolution for a complex world. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Alberts, S. (2009, 6. März). More NATO troops needed for Afghanistan success: MacKay.The National Post.
Anderson, J., Ikenberry, G., & Risse, T. (Hrsg.). (2008).The End of the West?: Crisis and change in the Atlantic order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Andrews, D. M. (2005).The Atlantic Alliance under stress: Us-European relations after Iraq. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bacevich, A. J. (2008). The Petraeus Doctrine.The Atlantic Monthly.
Balis, C. V., & Serfaty, S. (2004).Visions of America and Europe: September 11, Iraq, and transatlantic relations. Washington: CSIS Press.
Bapat, N. A. (2010). A game theoretic analysis of the Afghan surge.Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(3), 217–236.
Bender, P. (2008). Deutsche Außenpolitik: Vernunft und Schwäche.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 43, 3–6.
Bertelsmann Foundation. (2008).Trans-Atlantic briefing book: Managing expectations, expanding the partnership, shaping the agenda for 2009. Washington: Bertelsmann Foundation.
Biscop, S. (2004). Able and willing? Assessing the Eu’s capacity for military action.European Foreign Affairs Review, 9, 509–527.
Brzezinski, Z. (2009). An agenda for NATO.Foreign Affairs, 88(5), 2–20.
Bulmer, S., & Paterson, W. E. (1996). Germany in the European Union: Gentle giant or emergent leader?International Affairs, 72(1), 9–32.
Bundesministerium der Verteidigung. (2006).Weißbuch 2006 Zur Sicherheitspolitik Deutschlands und zur Zukunft der Bundeswehr. Berlin: Bundesministerium der Verteidigung.
Calleo, D. P., & Staal, E. R. (1998).Europe’s Franco-German engine. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Carter, S. (2009). Tipping point for Afghanistan?Public Policy Research, 16(3), 143–149.
Chiozza, G. (2009).Anti-Americanism and the American world order. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cohen, E. (2009, 3. Aug.). What’s different about the Obama Foreign Policy?Wall Street Journal.
Cohen, R. (2010, 6. Sep.). Europe and Benign neglect.The New York Times.
Cordesman, A. H. (2002).The lessons of Afghanistan: War fighting, intelligence, and force transformation. Washington: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Daalder, I. H., & Lindsay, J. M. (2005).America unbound: The Bush revolution in foreign policy. Hoboken: Wiley.
Dettke, D. (2009).Germany Says „No“: The Iraq war and the future of german foreign and security policy. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Deutscher Bundestag. (2002). Plenarprotokoll der 253. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am 13. September 2002.
Dobbins, J. (2007). Ending Afghanistan’s civil war. http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/2007/RAND_CT276.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. Nov. 2011.
Donini, A., Niland, N., & Wermester, K. (Hrsg.). (2004).Nation-Building Unraveled?: Aid, peace and justice in Afghanistan. Bloomfield: CT Kumarian Press.
Feichtinger, W. (2003). Ein Jahr ‚Krieg gegen Terror‘ in Afghanistan: ‚Alter‘ Krieg mit neuen Waffen?Oesterreichische Militaerische Zeitschrift, 41(2), 163–172.
Frevert, U. (2003).Vertrauen: Historische Annäherungen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprech.
Fröhlich, S. (2006). Außenpolitik: Mehr als nur ein Stilwechsel? In R. Sturm & H. Pehle (Hrsg.), Wege aus Der Krise? Die Agenda der zweiten großen Koalition (S. 221–238). Opladen: Budrich.
Germond, C., & Tulürk, H. (2008).A history of franco-german relations in Europe: From „Hereditary Enemies“ to partners. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Glenn, J. K. (2008).Will America’s image recover in Europe? Understanding pulbic opinion since 9/11. Washington: The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Gruber, P. (2009, 28. Apr.). „Barack Obama: Wie ‚Mr. Change‘ Amerika verändert hat“.Focus. http://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/tid-14082/barack-obama-wie-mr-change-amerika-veraendert-hat_aid_393703.html. Zugegriffen: 14. Nov. 2011.
Hacke, C. (1997).Die Außenpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Weltmacht wider Willen? Frankfurt a. M.: Ullstein.
Hacke, C. (2006) Deutsche Außenpolitik unter Bundeskanzlerin Merkel.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 43, 30–37.
Haftendorn, H. (2005). Das atlantische Bündnis als Transmissionsriemen atlantischer Politik.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 38–39, 8–15.
Haglund, D. G. (1991).Alliance within the alliance?: Franco-German military cooperation and the european pillar of defense. Boulder: Westview Press.
Hanrieder, W. F. (1991).Deutschland, Europa, Amerika. Die Außenpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1989. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Heisbourg, F. (2005). Von der Atlantischen Allianz zur europäisch- amerikanischen Partnerschaft.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 38–39, 3–8.
Heisbourg, F. (2004). The French-German duo and the search for a new european security model.International Spectator, 39(3), 61–72.
Hellmann, G. (2007). Deutschland, Europa und der Osten.Internationale Politik, 3, 21–28.
Holsti, O. R. (2008).To see ourselves as others see us: How publics abroad view the United States after 9/11. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
International Crisis Group. (2005). Afghanistan elections: Endgame or new beginning? http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/south-asia/afghanistan/101-afghanistan-elections-endgame-or-new-beginning.aspx. Zugegriffen: 22. Nov. 2011.
International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2009). Obama’s War in Afghanistan: Troop increase will help, but new strategy faces big challenges.Strategic Comments, 15(10), 1–2.
Jacoby, W. (2006). German transatlanticism: Between narcissism and nostalgia. In J. Baylis & J. Roper (Hrsg.),The United States and Europe: Beyond the neo-conservative divide? (S. 55–71). New York: Routledge.
Jäger, T. (2009). Alles anders mit Obama?Berliner Republik. http://www.b-republik.de/archiv/alles-anders-mit-obama. Zugegriffen: 14. Nov. 2011.
Jervis, R. (2005).American foreign policy in a new era. New York: Routledge.
Jervis, R. (2003). Understanding the Bush Doctrine.Political Science Quarterly, 118, 365–388.
Joffe, J. (2000). Clinton’s world: Purpose, policy, and weltanschauung.The Washington Quarterly, 24(1), 141–154.
Jones, S. G. (2006). Averting failure in Afghanistan.Survival, 48(1), 111–127.
Kagan, R. (2004).Of paradise and power: America and Europe in the new world order. New York: Vintage Books.
Kammel, A., & Zyla, B. (2111). Looking For A ‚Berlin-Plus In Reverse‘? Nato in search of a new strategic concept.Orbis, 55(4), 648–662.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1997). United Germany in an integrating Europe.Current History, 96(March), 116–123.
Katzenstein, P. J., & Keohane, R. O. (2007).Anti-Americanisms in world politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kiras, J. D. (2007). Irregular Warfare: Terrorism and insurgency. In J. Baylis (Hrsg.), Strategy in the contemporary world: An introduction to strategic studies (S. 163–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kurthen, H., & Immerfall, S. (2006).Safeguarding German-American relations in the new century: Understanding and accepting mutual differences. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Link, W. (2004). Grundlinien der außenpolitischen Orientierung Deutschlands.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 11, 3–8.
Longhurst, K. (2006). The old and the new: Germany, Poland and the recalibration of transatlantic security relations. In J. Baylis & J. Roper (Hrsg.), The United States and Europe: Beyond the Neoßconservative divide?. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mandelbaum, M. (1996). Foreign policy as social work.Foreign Affairs, January/February, 16–32.
Marsden, P. (2003). Afghanistan: The reconstruction process.International Affairs, 79(1), 91–105.
Martens, S. (2005). Die Zukunft Der Transatlantischen Beziehungen.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte,38–39, 31–37.
Maull, H. (2006).Germany’s uncertain power: Foreign policy of the Berlin republic. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
McDougall, W. A. (1997).Promised land, crusader state: The American encounter with the world since 1776. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Mead, W. R. (2001).Special providence: American foreign policy and how it changed the world. New York: Knopf.
Menon, A. (2004). From crisis to catharsis: ESDP after Iraq.International affairs, 80(4), 631–648.
Moens, A. (2004).The foreign policy of George W. Bush: Values, strategy and loyalty. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Montgomery, J. D., & Rondinelli D. A. (Hrsg.). (2004).Beyond reconstruction in Afghanistan: Lessons from development. New York: Palgrave.
Neuhäuser, A. (2006). Von der Entfremdung zur Wiederannäherung: zum Bestand der transatlantischen Beziehungen.Politische Meinung, 44, 38–42.
North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. (2010–2011). http://www.isaf.nato.int/isaf-placemat-archives.html. Zugegriffen: 17. Nov. 2011.
Obama, B. (2008, 7. Juni). Wenn die Hoffnung übertreibt.Handelsblatt.
Parmentier, G. (2004). Diverging visions: France and the United States after September 11. In C. V. Balis & S. Serfaty (Hrsg.), Visions of America and Europe: September 11, Iraq, and transatlantic relations (S. 116–136). Washington: CSIS Press.
Petraeus, D. H. (2009, 8. Feb.). The future of the alliance and the mission in Afghanistan. Remarks at the 45th Munich security conference.
Rice, C. (2000). Promoting the national interest.Foreign Affairs, 79(January/February), 45–62.
Rittberger, V. (Hrsg.) (2001).German foreign policy since unification: Theories and case studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ruttig, T. (2008).Afghanistan: Institutionen ohne Demokratie – Strukturelle Schwächen des Staatsaufbaus und Ansätze für eine politische Stabilisierung. SWP Studie. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Sanger, D. E. (2009, 11. Jan.). U.S. rejected aid for Israeli raid on iranian nuclear site.New York Times.
Shapiro, J., & Witney, N. (2009).Towards a post-American Europe: A power audit of EU-US relations. http://ecfr.3cdn.net/05b80f1a80154dfc64_x1m6bgxc2. Zugegriffen: 28. Okt. 2011.
Schmidt, P. (2008a).A hybrid relationship. Transatlantic security cooperation beyond NATO. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
Schmidt, P. (2008b)Das Internationale Engagement in Afghanistan: Strategien, Perspektiven, Konsequenzen. SWP Studie. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Schmitz, G. P. (2008, 26. März). The Afghan insurgency: Germany can do more. Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,543480,00.html. Zugegriffen: 22. Nov. 2011.
Schöllgen, G. (1999).Die Außenpolitik Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. München: C.H. Beck.
Schöllgen, G. (2000). Zehn Jahre Als Europäische Großmacht.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 24, 6–12.
Schöllgen, G. (2004). Die Zukunft der deutschen Außenpolitik liegt in Europa.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 11, 9–16.
Schwarz, H. P. (2007). Amerika ist unentbehrlich: Ein Plädoyer für ein atlantisches Deutschland. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (Hrsg.), Deutsche Außenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen Und Normen (S. 569–584). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Sokolsky, J. J. (2003). The power of values or the value of power? American and Europe in a post 9/11 World. http://www.isn.ethz.ch/isn/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?ots591=0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c7060233&lng=en&id=6829. Zugegriffen: 28. Okt. 2011.
SOWI. (2011). Ergebnisse der Bevölkerungsbefragung 2010 des Sozialwissenschaftlichen Instituts der Bundeswehr. http://www.sowi.bundeswehr.de/portal/a/swinstbw/!ut/p/c4/JYzBCsIwEET_KJtoK-LNUikevHix9SJJG8vSNCmbrb348SY4wzwYBgaekOz1B0fNGLx20ELX48lsIk7mFTf0kVNxFiOvfhTvQMaSMDupVEoJj_wwWNEHbzmTrWdMHElzILEEYpeXlSgtAgfopKorWciD_Et9j017uTXlvqiv1R2WeT7_AA08bVM!/. Zugegriffen: 21. Nov. 2011.
Stewart, P., & Entours, A. (2009, 7. Okt.). Obama recieves request for more Afghan troops.The Washington Post.
The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. (2008).A New map for American-German relations: Memorandum to the new U.S. president. Washington: The American institute for contemporary german studies.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2008). Energy information administration, country analysis briefs, Germany. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Germany/Background.html. Zugegriffen: 28. Okt. 2011.
United States Department of Defense. (2009).Progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan: Report to Congress in accordance with the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act. Washington: Department of Defense.
United States Senate. (2009, 13. Jan.). Transcript Of Clinton’s confirmation hearing. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
United States Congress. (2009, 24. Apr.). Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. implementing smart power: Setting an agenda for National Security Reform. Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Second Session. Washington: Government Printing Office.
Waltz, K. (1979).Theory of international politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Webber, D. (1999).The Franco-German relationship in the European Union. London: Routledge.
White House. (2006). The National security strategy of the United States of America. Washington: White House.
White House. (2002).The National security strategy of the United States of America. Washington: White House.
Woodward, B. (2002).Bush at war. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Woodward, B. (2004).Plan of attack. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Woodward, B. (2006).State of denial: Bush at war, Part III. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Wilton Park. (2009, 17. Jan.).NATO at 60: Towards a new strategic concept. Report on Wilton Park Conference.
Woyke, W. (2004).Deutsch-Französische Beziehungen seit der Wiedervereinigung: Das Tandem fasst wieder Tritt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.