Determining Dynamic Stability of a Re-entry Capsule at Free Fall

Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio - Trang 1-16 - 2023
C. Priyant Mark1, Winston Netto1
1Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

Tóm tắt

Re-entry capsules, designed with blunt-body shapes to endure hypersonic air velocities and heat, encounter instability in the low subsonic regime during the final descent phase. Ensuring a controlled descent with the appropriate attitude for deploying deceleration systems becomes paramount. To address this challenge, we employ a cost-effective approach to investigate the dynamic stability of a typical re-entry capsule in free fall. This study involves formulating the aerodynamic model of the system and hypothesizing associated coefficients. A meticulously designed and instrumented prototype is dynamically scaled and subjected to low altitude drop tests to recreate the desired scenario. Subsequently, the data collected during these tests is processed, and stability derivatives are estimated using system identification techniques. Our research contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamic stability of re-entry capsules during free fall, shedding light on their behavior and providing insights essential for improving their performance and safety during descent.

Tài liệu tham khảo

DuBose, H.C.: Static and dynamic stability of blunt bodies. Advisory Group Aeronaut Res Develop Paris (France) 347 (1961) Rom, J., Zorea, C.: Effect of a spike on the drag and on the aerodynamic stability of blunt bodies in supersonic flow. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 7(8), 1017–1019 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30094 Guglieri, G., Quagliotti, F.: Low speed dynamic tests on a capsule configuration. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 4(6), 383–390 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01066-X Murphy, K., Borg, S., Watkins, A., Cole, D., and Schwartz, R.: Testing of the crew exploration vehicle in NASA langley's unitary plan wind tunnel. In: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-1005 Murphy, K., Brauckmann, G., Bell, J., Rhode, M., Owens, D.B., Wilson, T., Bibb, K., Chan, D., Walker, E., “Orion crew module aerodynamic testing. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, (2011). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3502 Bibb, K., Brauckmann, G., Walker, E., and Robinson, P.: Development of the Orion crew module static aerodynamic database, Part I: Hypersonic. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, (2011). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3506 Desikan, S.L.N., Patil, M.M., Subramanian, S.: Understanding of flow features over a typical crew module at Mach 4. Aeronaut. J. 119(1216), 727–746 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000010794 Aubuchon, V.V., Owens, D.B., Carvajal, O., Lumb, S.B.: Dynamic stability of the boeing CST-100. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1399 Baillion, M.: Blunt bodies dynamic derivatives, special course on capsule aerodynamics. AGARD Report 808, (1997) Murman, S., Aftosmis, M.: Dynamic analysis of atmospheric-entry probes and capsules. In: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-74 Mitcheltree, R.A., Wilmoth, R.G., Cheatwood, F.M., Brauckmann, G.J., Greene, F.A.: Aerodynamics of Stardust sample return capsule. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 36(3), 429–435 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3463 Potturi, A.S., and Peroomian, O.: Dynamic stability analysis of the orion crew module through computational fluid dynamics. In: 46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (2016). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3200 Teramoto, S., Hiraki, K., Fujii, K.: Numerical analysis of dynamic stability of a reentry capsule at transonic speeds. AIAA J. 39(4), 646–653 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3463 Karatekin, Ö., Charbonnier, J.M., Wang, F., Dehant, V.: Dynamic stability of atmospheric entry probes. Planetary Probe Atmospheric Entry and Descent Trajectory Analysis and Science (2004) Fujita, K., Inatani, Y., Hiraki, K.: Attitude stability of blunt-body capsules in hypersonic rarefied regime. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 41(6), 925–931 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.3588 Mehta, R.C.: Computations of flowfield over reentry modules at high speed”, computational simulations and applications. IntechOpen (2011). https://doi.org/10.5772/24259 Kaushikh, K., Arunvinthan, S., Pillai, S.N.: Aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics of undulated re-entry vehicles. Acta Astronaut. 142, 95–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.10.024 Soumya, N., Nair, A.P., Brinda, V., Sheela, D.S., Lalithambika, V.R., Dhekane, M.V.: Attitude control schemes for crew module atmospheric re-entry experiment mission. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(1), 627–632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.105 Nomura, M., Fujita, K., Nagai, H.: Computational study of aerodynamic characteristics on reentry capsule aft-body shape in transonic flow. 2018 AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, (2018). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0290 Winchenbach, G.L., Chapman, G.T., Hathaway, W.H., Ramsey, A., Berner, C.: Dynamic stability of blunt atmospheric entry configurations. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 39(1), 49–55 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3781 Albisser, M.: Identification of aerodynamic coefficients from free flight data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université de Lorraine (2015) Owens, D.B., Aubuchon, V.: Overview of orion crew module and launch abort vehicle dynamic stability. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, (2011). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3504 Kazemba, C., Braun, R., Clark, I., Schoenenberger, M.: Survey of blunt body dynamic stability in supersonic flow. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-4509 Bibi, A., Maqsood, A., Go, T.H.: Review on analysis & modeling of dynamic stability characteristics of atmospheric entry vehicles. NUST J. Eng. Sci. 7(1), 15–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.24949/Fnjes.v7i1.121 Kazemba, C.D., Braun, R.D., Clark, I.G., Schoenenberger, M.: Survey of blunt-body supersonic dynamic stability. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 54(1), 109–127 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33552 Inatani, Y.: Reentry capsule for sample return from asteroids in the planetary exploration missions. J. Phys. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1005/1/012049 Nomura, M., Robbe, A., Fujita, K., Nagai, H.: Reentry capsule dynamic instability with different aft-body shape in transonic flow. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0018 Kobayashi, K., Ohmichi, Y., Kanazaki, M.: Modal decomposition analysis of subsonic unsteady flow around an atmospheric entry capsule with forced oscillation. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1851 Gainer, T.G., Hoffman, S.: Summary of transformation equations and equations of motion used in free flight and wind tunnel data reduction and analysis. NASA Technical Report, (1972) Etkin, B.: Dynamics of atmospheric flight. Wiley, New York (1972) Demuth, H., Beale, M.: Neural network toolbox: user’s guide: for use with Matlab. MathWorks Incorporated, (1992) Jategaonkar, R.V.: Flight vehicle system identification: a time-domain methodology. Am Institut. Aeronaut Astronaut. Inc. (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/4.102790