Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method

Journal of Agricultural Science - Tập 55 Số 1 - Trang 11-33 - 1960
J. M. Bremner1
1Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Tóm tắt

1. The reliability of the Kjeldahl method for the determination of nitrogen in soils has been investigated using a range of soils containing from 0·03 to 2·7% nitrogen.2. The same result was obtained when soil was analysed by a variety of Kjeldahl procedures which included methods known to recover various forms of nitrogen not determined by Kjeldahl procedures commonly employed for soil analysis. From this and other evidence presented it is concluded that very little, if any, of the nitrogen in the soils examined was in the form of highly refractory nitrogen compounds or of compounds containing N—N or N—O linkages.3. Results by the method of determining nitrogen in soils recommended by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists were 10–37% lower than those obtained by other methods tested. Satisfactory results were obtained by this method when the period of digestion recommended was increased.4. Ammonium-N fixed by clay minerals is determined by the Kjeldahl method.5. Selenium and mercury are considerably more effective than copper for catalysis of Kjeldahl digestion of soil. Conditions leading to loss of nitrogen using selenium are defined, and difficulties encountered using mercury are discussed.6. The most important factor in Kjeldahl analysis is the temperature of digestion with sulphuric acid, which is controlled largely by the amount of potassium (or sodium) sulphate used for digestion.7. The period of digestion required for Kjeldahl analysis of soil depends on the concentration of potassium sulphate in the digest. When the concentration is low (e.g. 0·3 g./ml. sulphuric acid) it is necessary to digest for several hours; when it is high (e.g. 1·0 g./ml. sulphuric acid) short periods of digestion are adequate. Catalysts greatly affect the rate of digestion when the salt concentration is low, but have little effect when the salt concentration is high.8. Nitrogen is lost during Kjeldahl analysis when the temperature of digestion exceeds about 400° C.9. Determinations of the amounts of sulphuric acid consumed by various mineral and organic soils during Kjeldahl digestion showed that there is little risk of loss of nitrogen under the conditions usually employed for Kjeldahl digestion of soil. Acid consumption values for various soil constituents are given, from which the amounts of sulphuric acid likely to be consumed during Kjeldahl digestion of different types of soil can be calculated.10. Semi-micro Kjeldahl methods of determining soil nitrogen gave the same results as macro-Kjeldahl methods.11. The use of the Hoskins apparatus for the determination of ammonium is described.12. It is concluded that the Kjeldahl method is satisfactory for the determination of nitrogen in soils provided a few simple precautions are observed. The merits and defects of different Kjeldahl procedures are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1017/S0021859600032767

10.1021/ac60071a026

Hiller, 1948, J. Biol. Chem., 176, 1401, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)57154-4

Willits, 1949, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 32, 118

Tinsley, 1950, Trans, 4th Int. Congr. Soil Sci., 1, 161

10.1021/ac60141a036

Self, 1912, Pharm. J., 88, 384

Secor, 1950, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 33, 872

10.1042/bj0360790

10.1111/j.1365-2389.1954.tb02192.x

10.1039/an9568100316

Piper, 1944, Soil and Plant Analysis

Olsen, 1929, C.R. Lab. Carlsberg, 17

10.1017/S0021859600019687

Campbell, 1937, J. Biol. Chem., 119, 1, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)74426-8

Clark, 1941, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 24, 641

Jackson, 1958, Soil Chemical Analysis

10.1017/S0021859600083489

Jonnard, 1945, Industr. Engng Chem., 17, 246

10.1111/j.1365-2389.1959.tb02353.x

Collins, 1906, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 25, 518

10.1007/BF01338151

Friedrich, 1933, Die Praxis der quantitativen organischen Mikroanalyse

Anantakrishnan, 1952, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 36, 229, 10.1007/BF03050467

10.1021/ac60062a028

10.1021/ac60065a033

10.1515/bchm2.1933.216.1-2.68

10.1017/S0021859600040259

10.1021/ac60126a024

10.1042/bj0370354

10.1002/jctb.5000600704

10.1021/ac60013a015

Alves, 1952, Melhoramento, 4, 135

Murneek A. E. & Heinze P. H. (1937). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 261.

10.1021/ac60085a044

1955, Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists

10.1139/cjr35b-025

10.1002/jctb.5010040706

10.1017/S0021859600021924

10.1038/175513b0

10.1021/ja01413a029

10.1007/BF01375926

Srinivasan, 1932, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2, 525

10.1021/ac60038a038

10.1021/ac60059a028

10.1017/S0021859600036625

Lauro, 1931, Industr. Engng Chem., 3, 401

10.1071/CH9540055

White, 1948, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 31, 657

McKibbin, 1935, Trans. 3rd Int. Congr. Soil Sci., 1, 419

Ogg, 1950, J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 33, 100

Shinn, 1941, Industr. Engng Chem., 13, 33

10.1111/j.2042-7158.1951.tb13127.x

Ashton, 1937, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 56, 101, 10.1002/jctb.5000560501

10.1017/S0021859600082393

10.1097/00010694-195812000-00010

10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60079-0

10.1021/ac60078a035

Hoskins, 1944, Analyst, 69, 271