Determination of antimicrobial and antiviral properties of IR3535

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 46 - Trang 1819-1824 - 2019
Zeynep Iyigundogdu1, Sadik Kalayci2, Ayla Burcin Asutay2, Fikrettin Sahin2
1Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adana Science and Technology University, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
2Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey

Tóm tắt

Insect repellent is a substance directly applied to skin or clothing in order to repel flies, mosquitoes, ticks etc. IR3535 or Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate (EBAAP) is a relatively new repellent which is classified as a biopesticide due to exceptional skin tolerance and overall safety. The repellency against various insect and ticks, and the low toxicity of IR3535 are well acknowledged. However, there has been no attempt to investigate the effects on microorganisms or viruses up to now. In the present study, antimicrobial activity was investigated based on disc diffusion and micro-well dilution assays. Disc diffusion assays revealed IR3535 displayed remarkable antimicrobial activity on the microorganisms tested. MIC results showed that the antifungal efficiency of IR3535 is higher with respect to its antibacterial and anticandidal efficiency. Moreover, antiviral test results revealed that IR3535 showed antiviral effects against Poliovirus and Adenovirus. This is the first study that reveals IR3535’s antimicrobial and antiviral properties against a broad range of microorganisms and viruses. In consideration of the antimicrobial and antiviral properties, IR3535 is a promising agent that could be used to develop novel therapeutic approaches, new application areas and formulations in the future.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Tolle MA (2009) Mosquito-borne diseases. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 39(4):97–140 Naucke TJ, Lorentz S, Grünewald H-W (2006) Laboratory testing of the insect repellents IR3535® and DEET against Phlebotomus mascittii and P. duboscqi (Diptera: Psychodidae). Int J Med Microbiol 296:230–232 Bissinger BW, Roe RM (2010) Tick repellents: past, present, and future. Pestic Biochem Physiol 96(2):63–79 Strickman D (2006) Older synthetic active ingredients and current additives. In: Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses Sandstrom MW, Kolpin DW, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD (2005) Widespread detection of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide in US Streams: Comparison with concentrations of pesticides, personal care products, and other organic wastewater compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(5):1029–1034 Frances SP, Debboun M, Debboun M, Frances S, Strickman D (2007) User acceptability: public perceptions of insect repellents. In: Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses, pp 397–404 Katz TM, Miller JH, Hebert AA (2008) Insect repellents: historical perspectives and new developments. J Am Acad Dermatol 58(5):865–871 Brown M, Hebert AA (1997) Insect repellents: an overview. J Am Acad Dermatol 36(2):243–249 Puccetti G, Debboun M, Frances S, Strickman D (2006) IR3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate). In: Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses Carroll SP (2008) Prolonged efficacy of IR3535 repellents against mosquitoes and blacklegged ticks in North America. J Med Entomol 45(4):706–714 Nentwig G (2003) Use of repellents as prophylactic agents. Parasitol Res 90(1):S40–S48 Debboun M, Frances SP, Strickman D (2006) Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses. CRC Press, Boca Raton von Elert E, Preuss K, Fink P (2016) Infodisruption of inducible anti-predator defenses through commercial insect repellents? Environ Pollut 210:18–26 Kalaycı S, Demirci S, Sahin F (2014) Determination of antimicrobial properties of Picaridin and DEET against a broad range of microorganisms. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30(2):407–411 Wayne P (2007) Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV (1977) Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol 11(7):714–719 Livermore DM (2002) Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis 34(5):634–640 Benz R, Hancock RE (1981) Properties of the large ion-permeable pores formed from protein F of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in lipid bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) 646(2):298–308 Poole K (2001) Multidrug efflux pumps and antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related organisms. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 3(2):255–264 Epstein HA (2012) Repelling insects with safe and effective alternatives to DEET. Skinmed 10(1):36–39 Park SJ, Kim JE, Park MJ, Lee IS, Lee J, Lee J, Kim BH, Lee DK, Lee SP (2012) Repellent efficacy and safety evaluation of IR3535 derivative against Aedes albopictus, Culex pipiens pallens and Aedes togoi. Entomol Res 42(6):299–307 Naucke T, Kröpke R, Benner G, Schulz J, Wittern K, Rose A, Kröckel U, Grünewald H (2007) Field evaluation of the efficacy of proprietary repellent formulations with IR3535® and Picaridin against Aedes aegypti. Parasitol Res 101(1):169–177 Staub D, Debrunner M, Amsler L, Steffen R (2002) Effectiveness of a repellent containing DEET and EBAAP for preventing tick bites. Wilderness Environ Med 13(1):12–20 Faulde MK, Albiez G, Nehring O (2010) Insecticidal, acaricidal and repellent effects of DEET-and IR3535-impregnated bed nets using a novel long-lasting polymer-coating technique. Parasitol Res 106(4):957–965