Determinants of client‐initiated and auditor‐initiated auditor changes

Emerald - Tập 23 Số 1 - Trang 4-25 - 2007
Thomas G.Calderon1, EmekaOfobike1
1George W. Daverio School of Accountancy, College of Business Administration, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposePrior studies include auditor‐initiated (AI) and client‐initiated (CI) auditor changes together and conduct research as though they were the same. This paper aims to hypothesize that AI and CI changes are driven by different interests and to examine factors that could explain and predict them.Design/methodology/approachBased on the prior literature, the authors classified factors into AI and CI categories a priori, and then developed hypotheses that aligned with the classification. The data source is AuditAnalytics.FindingsThe univariate and multivariate analyses support the hypothesis that CI and AI separations are driven by different interests. The empirically determined prediction model (a classification and regression trees (CART)‐generated six‐step process), which performed better than other multivariate models, classifies AI and CI auditor separations with an accuracy rate of 68 percent.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings suggest that future research should incorporate the differences between AI and CI separations into their studies. One intriguing issue is the lack of importance of the variable audit fees to total fees in the CART model. Though statistically significant in some of the multivariate analyses, the variable is not important in the CART model. This issue merits further investigation as it could provide important insight into dependency issues that are presumed by current audit regulation.Practical implicationsThe paper has important implications for practice. It offers insight into factors that drive CI and AI auditor separations. The CART model may serve as a decision aid for both auditors and regulators as they contemplate and evaluate auditor change decisions.Originality/valueThe paper provides original insight into AI and CI auditor changes when considered as distinct issues that are driven by different interests.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Antle, R. and Nalebuff, B. (1991), “Conservatism and auditor‐client negotiations”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 29, pp. 31‐59, Supplement.

Arens, A., Elder, R. and Beasley, M. (2006), Auditing and Assurance Services, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R.A. and Stone, C.J. (1984), Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.

Calderon, T.G., Cheh, J. and Kim, I. (2003), “How large corporations use data mining to create value”, Management Accounting Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 1‐11.

Callen, J.L., Livnat, J. and Segan, D. (2006), “Accounting restatements: are they always bad news for investors?”, Journal of Investing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 57‐68.

Chen, Y., Gupta, A. and Senteney, D. (2004), “Predicting impending bankruptcy using audit firm changes”, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 423‐33.

DeFond, M.L. and Subramanyam, K.R. (1998), “Auditor changes and discretionary accruals”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 35‐67.

Dhaliwal, D., Schatzberg, J. and Trombley, M. (1993), “An analysis of the economic factors related to auditor‐client disagreements preceding auditor changes”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 22‐39.

Dye, R. (1991), “Informationally motivated auditor replacement”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 347‐74.

Feldman, D. and Gross, S. (2005), “Mortgage default: classification trees analysis”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 369‐96.

Firth, M. (1997), “The provision of non‐audit services and the pricing of audit fees”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 511‐25.

Fusco, C. (2006), “Is it time to revise 8‐K rules on auditor changes?”, Financial Executive, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 49‐51.

GAO (2002), “Financial statement restatements: trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges”, GAO‐03‐138 Report, General Accounting Office, US Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, available at: www.goa.gov/new.items/d03138.pdf (accessed August 23, 2007).

Gomez‐Auilar, N. and Ruiz‐Barbadillo, E. (2003), “Do Spanish firms change auditors to avoid a qualified audit report”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 37‐53.

Gregory, A. and Collier, P. (1996), “Audit fees and auditor change; an investigation of the persistence of the reduction by type of change”, Journal Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 13‐28.

Hackenbrack, K.E. and Hogan, C.E. (2002), “Market response to earnings surprises conditional on reasons for auditor change”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 195‐223.

Hackenbrack, K.E. and Hogan, C.E. (2005), “Client retention and engagement level pricing”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 7‐20.

Hay, D., Knechel, R. and Li, V. (2006), “Non‐audit services and auditor independence: New Zealand evidence”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 33 Nos 5/6, pp. 715‐34.

Hudaib, M. and Cooke, T.E. (2005), “The impact of managing director changes and financial distress on audit qualification and auditor switches”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 32 Nos 9/10, pp. 1703‐39.

Johnson, B. and Lys, T. (1990), “The market for audit services: evidence from voluntary audit changes”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 Nos 1/3, pp. 281‐308.

Judge, C., Hill, R., Griffiths, W., Lutkepohl, H. and Lee, T. (1988), Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, NY.

MacDonald, E. (1997), “More accounting firms are dumping risky clients”, Wall Street Journal, Friday, April, p. 25.

Macgee, R. and Tseng, M. (1990), “Audit pricing and independence”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 315‐36.

Matsumura, E., Subramanyam, K.R. and Tucker, R. (1997), “Strategic auditor behavior and the going concern decision”, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 727‐58.

Palmrose, Z. (1984), “The demand for quality‐differentiated audit services in an agency‐cost setting: an empirical investigation”, in Abdel‐khalik, A.R. and Solomon, I. (Eds), Sixth Symposium on Auditing Research, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, pp. 229‐52.

Quick, R. and Warming‐Rasmussen, B. (2005), “The impact of MAS on perceived auditor independence‐some evidence from Denmark”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 137‐68.

Salford Systems (1999), Data Mining with Decision Trees; An Introduction to CART, Salford Systems, San Diego, CA.

Sankaraguruswamy, S. and Whisenant, J.S. (2004), “An empirical analysis of voluntarily supplied client‐auditor realignment reasons”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 107‐21.

Simunic, D. and Stein, M. (1990), “Audit risk in a client portfolio context”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 329‐43.

Stein, J., Kalb, G., Possinger, K. and Wernecke, K.D. (2001), “Extension to the validation of classification trees”, Biometrical Journal, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 107‐16.

Toffler, B. and Reingold, J. (2003), Ambition, Greed and the Fall of Arthur Andersen. Final Accounting, Broadway Books, New York, NY.

Turner, L.E., Williams, J.P. and Weirich, T. (2005), “An inside look at auditor changes”, The CPA Journal, pp. 12‐21, November, (Innovations in Auditing special issue).

Wallace, W. (2005), “Auditor changes and restatements: an analysis of recent history”, The CPA Journal, March, pp. 30‐3.

Williams, D.D. (1988), “The potential determinants of auditor change”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 243‐61.

Woo, E. and Koh, H.C. (2001), “Factors associated with auditor changes: a Singapore study”, Accounting & Business Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 133‐44.

Anderson, D., Strokes, D. and Zimmer, I. (1993), “Corporate takeover and auditor switching”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 12, pp. 65‐73.

Beatty, V. and Fearnley, S. (1995), “The importance of audit firm characteristics and the drivers of auditor change in UK listed companies”, Accounting & Business Research, Vol. 25, pp. 227‐39.

Beatty, V. and Fearnley, S. (1998), “Audit market competition: auditor changes and the impact of tender”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 30, pp. 261‐89.

Branson, J. and Breesch, D. (2004), “Referral as a determining factor for changing auditors in the Belgium auditing market: an empirical study”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 39, pp. 307‐26.

Chow, C. and Rice, S. (1982), “Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 326‐35.

Controller's Report (2006), “Audit fees increase 292% since 2001 for S&P small‐cap”, Controller's Report, September, pp. 1‐3.

Craswell, A.T. (1988), “The association between qualified opinions and auditor switches”, Accounting & Business Research, Vol. 19 No. 73, pp. 23‐31.

DeFond, M.L. (1992), “The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 16‐31.

Eichenseher, J. and Shields, D. (1989), “Corporate capital structure and auditor ‘fit’”, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 7, pp. 39‐56, Supplement 1.

Firth, M. (1999), “Company takeover and the auditor choice decision”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 197‐214.

Francis, J. and Wilson, E. (1988), “Auditor changes: a joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation”, Accounting Review, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 663‐82.

Haskins, M. and Williams, D. (1990), “A contingent model of intra‐big 8 auditor changes”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 9, pp. 55‐74.

Healy, P. (1985), “The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting principles”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 85‐107.

Kellogg, R.L. (1979), “An empirical study of rule 10b‐5 buyers' suits based on accounting disclosures”, PhD dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

Lys, T. and Watts, R.L. (1994), “Lawsuits against auditors”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 65‐93, 1994 Supplement.

Pierre, K. St and Anderson, J. (1984), “An analysis of factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 242‐63.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 23 Số 1

4-25

Thông tin tác giả