Determinants of Use of Emergency Medical Services in a Population With Stroke Symptoms

Stroke - Tập 31 Số 11 - Trang 2591-2596 - 2000
Emily B. Schroeder1, Wayne D. Rosamond1, Dexter L. Morris1, Kelly R. Evenson1, Albert R. Hinn1
1From the Department of Epidemiology (E.B.S., W.D.R., K.R.E.), School of Public Health, and the Departments of Emergency Medicine (D.L.M.) and Neurology (A.H.), School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Tóm tắt

Background and Purpose —With the advent of time-dependent thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke, it has become increasingly important for stroke patients to arrive at the hospital quickly. This study investigates the association between the use of emergency medical services (EMS) and delay time among individuals with stroke symptoms and examines the predictors of EMS use.

Methods —The Second Delay in Accessing Stroke Healthcare Study (DASH II) was a prospective study of 617 individuals arriving at emergency departments in Denver, Colo, Chapel Hill, NC, and Greenville, SC, with stroke symptoms.

Results —EMS use was associated with decreased prehospital and in-hospital delay. Those who used EMS had a median prehospital delay time of 2.85 hours compared with 4.03 hours for those who did not use EMS ( P =0.002). Older individuals were more likely to use EMS (odds ratio [OR] 1.21 for each 5-year increase, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.29), as were individuals who expressed a high sense of urgency about their symptoms (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.62). Knowledge of stroke symptoms was not associated with increased EMS use (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.98). Patients were more likely to use EMS if someone other than the patient first identified that there was a problem (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.44).

Conclusions —Interventions aimed at increasing EMS use among stroke patients need to stress the urgency of stroke symptoms and the importance of calling 911 and need to be broad-based, encompassing not only those at high risk for stroke but also their friends and family.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Heart Association. 2000 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas Tex: American Heart Association; 1999.

Shahar E, McGovern PG, Smith MA, Jacobs DR, Arnett DK, Luepker RV. Recent trends in stroke mortality rate, incidence, and case-fatality in metropolitan Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota: the Minnesota Stroke Survey. Circulation.. 2000;101:720. Abstract P19.

10.1056/NEJM199512143332401

Adams HP, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Kwiatkowski T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Torner J, Feinberg W, Mayberg M, Thies W. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke.. 1996;27:1711–1718.

10.1001/jama.283.23.3102

10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70431-2

10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02574.x

10.1212/WNL.51.2.427

10.1161/str.30.1.40

10.1161/str.28.5.912

10.1161/str.26.3.409

10.1080/10903129908958936

10.1001/archinte.1993.00410220058006

Barer D, Main A, Lodwick R. Practicability of early treatment of acute stroke. Lancet. 1992;339:1540–1541.

10.1093/qjmed/91.9.635

10.1159/000108455

10.1161/str.27.3.398

10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00159.x

Kothari R. Acute Stroke. Dallas Tex: American Heart Association; 1998.

Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.

10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06947.x

10.1161/str.26.6.937

10.1097/00063110-199906000-00002

10.1161/str.24.12.8248959