Determinants and costs of strategic enrollment of landowners in a payments for ecosystem services program in a deforestation hotspot: The Argentine Chaco forest

Aguilar-Gómez, 2020, Differentiated payments for environmental services: a review of the literature, Ecosyst. Serv., 44, 101131, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101131 Alcañiz, 2020, Between the global commodity boom and subnational state capacities: payment for environmental services to fight deforestation in Argentina, Global Environ. Politics, 20, 38, 10.1162/glep_a_00535 Alix-Garcia, J., De Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E., & Torres, J.M. (2005). An assessment of Mexico’s payment for environmental services program. Comparative Studies Service, Agricultural and Development Economics Division, FAO, Rome, 2005. Aprile G., Periago, M.E., Miñarro, F.O., 2016. La fauna y los silvopastoriles del Chaco. Boletín técnico de la Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires. Authelet, 2021, Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia, World Dev., 145, 105487, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487 Barral, 2020, Widespread and major losses in multiple ecosystem services as a result of agricultural expansion in the Argentine Chaco, J. Appl. Ecol., 57, 2485, 10.1111/1365-2664.13740 Bateman, 2018, Payments for environmental services to strengthen ecosystem connectivity in an agricultural landscape, Environ. Dev. Econ., 23, 635, 10.1017/S1355770X1800030X Baumann, 2022, Frontier metrics for a process-based understanding of deforestation dynamics, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 095010, 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8b9a Blackman, 2010, User financing in a national payments for environmental services program: Costa Rican hydropower, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1626, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.004 Blum, 2022, Subnational institutions and power of landholders drive illegal deforestation in a major commodity production frontier, Glob. Environ. Chang., 74, 102511, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102511 Clements, 2015, Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia, Conserv. Biol., 29, 78, 10.1111/cobi.12423 Curran, 2016, Pay the farmer, or buy the land?—Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services versus land purchases or easements in Central Kenya, Ecol. Econ., 127, 59, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.016 de la Sancha, 2021, The disappearing Dry Chaco, one of the last dry forest systems on earth, Landsc. Ecol., 36, 2997, 10.1007/s10980-021-01291-x De Marzo, 2021, Characterizing forest disturbances across the Argentine Dry Chaco based on Landsat time series, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 98, 102310 Del Rossi, 2021, A mixed-methods analysis for improving farmer participation in agri-environmental payments for ecosystem services in Vermont, USA, Ecosyst. Serv., 47, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101223 Drechsler, 2011, Trade-offs in the design of cost-effective habitat networks when conservation costs are variable in space and time, Biol. Conserv., 144, 479, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.001 Duke, 2014, Payments for ecosystem services and landowner interest: Informing program design trade-offs in Western Panama, Ecol. Econ., 103, 44, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.013 Engel, 2016, The devil in the detail: a practical guide on designing payments for environmental services, Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ., 9, 131, 10.1561/101.00000076 Etchart, 2020, What happens when the money runs out? Forest outcomes and equity concerns following Ecuador’s suspension of conservation payments, World Dev., 136, 105124, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105124 Ezzine-de-Blas, 2016, Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services, PLoS One, 11, e0149847, 10.1371/journal.pone.0149847 Fernández, 2020, A hard-to-keep promise: Vegetation use and aboveground carbon storage in silvopastures of the Dry Chaco, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 303, 107117, 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107117 Ferraro, 2008, Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 65, 810, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029 García Collazo, 2013, Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos: resultados de la zonificación realizada por provincias del norte argentino, Ecol. Austral, 23, 97, 10.25260/EA.13.23.2.0.1165 Gobbi, 2022, Forest degradation in the Dry Chaco: A detection based on 3D canopy reconstruction from UAV-SfM techniques, For. Ecol. Manage., 526, 120554, 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120554 Haddad, 2015, Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems, Sci. Adv., 1, e1500052, 10.1126/sciadv.1500052 Izquierdo, 2009, Agriculture adjustment, land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 858, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.013 Jones, 2020, Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: a systematic review, Ecosyst. Serv., 45, 101159, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101159 Kautz, 2006, How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther, Biol. Conserv., 130, 118, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.007 Kunst, 2012, Disrupting woody steady states in the Chaco region (Argentina): responses to combined disturbance treatments, Ecol. Eng., 42, 42, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.01.025 Laurance, 2011, The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation, Biol. Conserv., 144, 56, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.021 Law, 2021, Fading opportunities for mitigating agriculture-environment trade-offs in a South American deforestation hotspot, Biol. Conserv., 262, 109310, 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109310 Layton, 2009, Payments for ecosystem services programs: predicting landowner enrollment and opportunity cost using a beta-binomial model, Environ. Resour. Econ., 44, 415, 10.1007/s10640-009-9293-5 Ma, 2012, Farmers’ willingness to participate in payment-for-environmental-services programmes, J. Agric. Econ., 63, 604, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00358.x Marquez, 2022, Silvopastoral and peasant management effects on vegetation and soil quality in the arid chaco of central Argentina, J. Arid Environ., 206, 104845, 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104845 Massfeller, 2022, Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective, Land Use Policy, 120, 106281, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106281 Mastrangelo, 2012, Trade-offs between cattle production and bird conservation in an agricultural frontier of the Gran Chaco of Argentina, Conserv. Biol., 26, 1040, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01904.x Matteucci, 2016, Ecological and social consequences of the Forest Transition Theory as applied to the Argentinean Great Chaco, Land Use Policy, 51, 8, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.032 McGuire, 2016, Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 7195, 10.1073/pnas.1602817113 Nunez Godoy, 2022, Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina, Forest Policy Econ., 138, 102708, 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708 Núñez-Regueiro, 2015, Spatial patterns of mammal occurrence in forest strips surrounded by agricultural crops of the Chaco region, Argentina, Biol. Conserv., 187, 19, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.001 Núñez-Regueiro, 2019, Adding the temporal dimension to spatial patterns of payment for ecosystem services enrollment, Ecosyst. Serv., 36, 100906, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100906 Núñez-Regueiro, 2020, Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of Payment for Ecosystem Service Programs in Argentina, Land Use Policy, 95, 104596, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596 Peri, 2022, Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests, Ecol. Austral, 32, 749, 10.25260/EA.22.32.2.1.1872 Piquer-Rodríguez, 2015, Effects of past and future land conversions on forest connectivity in the Argentine Chaco, Landsc. Ecol., 30, 817, 10.1007/s10980-014-0147-3 Prado, 1993, What is the Gran Chaco vegetation in South America? I: A review. Contribution to the study of flora and vegetation of the Chaco, Candollea, 48, 145 Rabinowitz, 2010, A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca, Biol. Conserv., 143, 939, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.002 Ramirez-Reyes, 2018, Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico reduce forest fragmentation, Ecol. Appl., 28, 1982, 10.1002/eap.1753 Sarmiento, M., Brassiolo, M., Senilliani, M.G., Kunst, C., Navall, M., Kees, S., et al., 2021. Chapter 10: Parque Chaqueño. In: Peri, P.L., Martinez Pastur, G.J., & Schlichter, T. M., (Eds.), Uso sostenible del bosque. Aportes desde la Silvicultura Argentina (pp. 543-692). Buenos Aires, Ministro de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible de la Nación. SAyDS (2021). Estado de implementación de la Ley 26.331 de Presupuestos Mínimos de Protección Ambiental de los Bosques Nativos. Noviembre 2021. Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación, Buenos Aires. Schmidt, 2014, Ordenadores y ordenados. Actores en disputa en el ordenamiento territorial de bosques nativos en la provincia de Salta, Cuadernos de Antropología, 11, 37 Siikamäki, 2007, Potential cost-effectiveness of incentive payment programs for the protection of non-industrial private forests, Land Econ., 83, 539, 10.3368/le.83.4.539 Sims, 2017, Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 86, 8, 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.010 Tanaka, 2022, Farmers’ preferences toward an outcome-based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan, J. Agric. Econ., 73, 720, 10.1111/1477-9552.12478 Thompson, 2022, Jaguar (Panthera onca) population density and landscape connectivity in a deforestation hotspot: the Paraguayan Dry Chaco as a case study, Perspectives in Ecol. Conserv., 20, 377, 10.1016/j.pecon.2022.09.001 Vallejos, 2021, The law is spider's web: an assessment of illegal deforestation in the Argentine Dry Chaco ten years after the enactment of the “Forest Law”, Environ. Development, 38, 100611, 10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100611 Viglizzo, 2011, Ecological and environmental footprint of 50 years of agricultural expansion in Argentina, Glob. Chang. Biol., 17, 959, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02293.x Vonelec, 2019, Conservation value of small reserves, Conserv. Biol., 34, 66 Wood, 2020, Payments for environmental service’s role in landscape connectivity, Environ. Conserv., 47, 89, 10.1017/S0376892920000016 Wunder, 2007, The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conserv. Biol., 21, 48, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x Wünscher, 2008, Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits, Ecol. Econ., 65, 822, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014 Zárrate Charry, 2022, Connectivity conservation at the crossroads: protected areas versus payments for ecosystem services in conserving connectivity for Colombian carnivores, R. Soc. Open Sci., 9, 10.1098/rsos.201154 Zhang, 2021, Maximising the benefits of regulatory ecosystem services via spatial optimisation, J. Clean. Prod., 291, 125272, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125272