Detection and Mapping of Duplicate Loci in Brassica juncea

Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology - Tập 11 - Trang 37-42 - 2012
T. Mohapatra1, A. Upadhyay1, A. Sharma1, R. P. Sharma1
1National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India

Tóm tắt

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Brassica juncea genome using 39 random homologous genomic DNA clones and chlorophyll a, b binding polypeptide (cab-3c) cDNA of tomato as probes revealed high degree of sequence duplication. The average number of hybridizing fragments per probe (8) was much higher than that earlier reported using cDNA probes in B. juncea. Null alleles observed for majority (56.2%) of the polymorphic duplicate loci suggested a significant role of insertion/deletion events in evolution of mustard genome. Distortion in segregation was evident in respect of only 9.6% of the segregating loci indicating that the mapping population used was relatively unbiased and thus can be used efficiently for genome mapping as well as for location of genes. Forty-nine polymorphic duplicate loci could be mapped to 15 linkage groups. Arrangement of these loci on different linkage groups revealed intra and inter-chromosomal duplications as well as duplication of chromosome blocks.Three of the eight cab loci could be mapped on three different linkage groups. Null allelic situation for seven of the cab loci suggested the role of DNA rearrangement in evolution of this multigene family in B. juncea.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Phillips RL & Vasil IK, DNA based markers in plants, 2nd ed, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands(2001) Quiros CF, In DNA based markers in plants, 2nd ed (RL Phillips, IK Vasil, Editors) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (2001) pp 201–237 Sharma A, Mohapatra T & Sharma RP, J Plant Biochem Biotechnol, 3 (1994) 85. Cheung WY, Friesen L, Rakow GFW, Seguin-Swartz G & Landry BS, TheorAppl Genet, 94 (1997) 841. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, Nature, 408 (2000) 796 Arumuganathan K & Earle ED, Plant Mol Biol Rept, 9 (1991) 208. Mohapatra T, Sharma RP & Chopra VL, Curr Sci, 62 (1992) 482. Pichersky E, Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD, Breidenbach RB, Kausch AP & Cashmore AR, Gene, 40 (1985) 247. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE & Newburg L, Genomics, 1 (1987) 174. Kosambi DD, Ann Eugenet, 12 (1944) 172. Song KM, Suzuki ZY, Slocum MK, Williams PH & Osborn TC, TheorAppl Genet, 82 (1991) 296. Chyi YS, Hoenecke ME & Sernyk JL, Genome, 35 (1992) 746. Slocum MK, Figdore SS, Kennard WC, Suzuki ZY & Osborn TC, Theor Appl Genet, 80 (1990) 57. Landry BS, Hubbert N, Crete R, Chang MS, Lincoln SE, & Etoh T, Genome, 35 (1992) 409. Truco MJ & Quiros CF, Theor Appl Genet, 89 (1994) 590. Lagercrantz U & Lydiate D.J, Genome, 38 (1995) 255. Landry BS, Hubbert N, Crete R, Etoh T, Harada JJ, & Lincoln SE, Genome, 34 (1991) 543. Parkin IAP, Sharpe AG, Keith DJ & Lydiate DT, Genome, 38 (1995) 1122. Prakash S & Hinata K, Opera Bot, 55 (1980) 1. Ferreira ME, Williams PH & Osborn TC, Theor Appl Genet, 90 (1994) 727. Uzunova M, Ecke W, Weissleder K & Robbelen G, Theor Appl Genet, 90 (1995) 194. Wang GL, Mackill DJ, Bonman JM, McCouch SR, Champoux MC & Nelson RJ, Genetics, 136 (1994) 1421. Kianian SF & Quiros CF, Theor Appl Genet, 84 (1992) 544. Dunsmuir P, Nucl Acids Res, 13 (1985) 2503. Vallejos CE, Tanksley SD & Bernatzky R, Genetics, 112 (1986) 93.