Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Phát hiện cảm xúc tiếp nhận và rõ ràng từ khuôn mặt ở các độ tuổi khác nhau
European Journal of Ageing - 2024
Tóm tắt
Cảm xúc được xử lý trong não thông qua hai tuyến đường chính: một tuyến đường vỏ não, chịu trách nhiệm cho việc nhận diện chi tiết và có ý thức, chủ yếu dựa vào tần số không gian cao (HSF), và một tuyến đường dưới vỏ não, chịu trách nhiệm cho việc xử lý thô và không có ý thức, dựa trên tần số không gian thấp (LSF). Tuy nhiên, rất ít thông tin về những thay đổi có thể xảy ra trong chức năng của hai tuyến đường này khi lão hóa. Trong nghiên cứu trực tuyến go/no-go hiện tại, 112 người trưởng thành trẻ và 111 người cao tuổi được yêu cầu nhấn nút khi một khuôn mặt vui vẻ hoặc tức giận xuất hiện (go) và ngăn chặn phản ứng đối với các khuôn mặt trung tính (no-go). Các kích thích khuôn mặt được trình bày không qua lọc (hình ảnh băng thông rộng), được lọc ở HSF và LSF, và các hình thức lai (LSF của một biểu cảm cảm xúc chồng lên HSF của cùng một khuôn mặt với biểu cảm trung tính). Tất cả các kích thích cũng được trình bày với sự xoay trục dọc (lật ngược) để điều tra phân tích toàn cục của khuôn mặt khi lão hóa. Kết quả cho thấy những người tham gia trẻ tuổi có hiệu suất tổng thể tốt hơn so với người già ở tất cả các điều kiện ngoại trừ các kích thích lai. Hiệu ứng đảo ngược khuôn mặt như mong đợi đã được xác nhận trong cả hai nhóm tuổi. Chúng tôi kết luận rằng, bên cạnh việc tổng thể suy giảm kỹ năng nhận thức với tuổi tác, không có suy giảm cụ thể nào trong chức năng của cả hai tuyến đường vỏ não và dưới vỏ não được phát hiện.
Từ khóa
#cảm xúc #lão hóa #tuyến đường vỏ não #tuyến đường dưới vỏ não #kích thích khuôn mặt #nhận diện khuôn mặtTài liệu tham khảo
Barber SJ, Schoeke A, Mather M (2022) Age-differences in interpreting the valence of ambiguous facial expressions: evidence for multiple contributing processes. Neuropsychol Dev Cognit Sect B Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 29(4):720–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2021.1902937
Boutet I, Faubert J (2006) Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults. Mem Cognit 34(4):854–864. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193432
Cannito L, Anzani S, Bortolotti A, Palumbo R, Ceccato I, Di Crosta A, Di Domenico A, Palumbo R (2021) Temporal discounting of money and face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of hoarding level. Front Psychol 12:642102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642102
Carstensen LL, Mikels JA, Mather M (2006) Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation, and emotion. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW, Abeles RP, Gatz M, Salthouse TA (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging, 6th edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012101264-9/50018-5
Cassidy B, Wiley R, Sim M, Hugenberg K (2021) Spatial frequency and valence interact in complex emotion perception. Cogn Emot 35(8):1618–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.1979474
Ceccato I, Di Crosta A, Palumbo R, Marchetti D, La Malva P, Maiella R, Marin A, Mammarella N, Verrocchio MC, Di Domenico A (2021) Data on the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on people’s expectations about their future. Data Brief 35:106892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.106892
Ceccato I, La Malva P, Di Crosta A, Palumbo R, Gatti M, Momi D, Logrieco MGM, Fasolo M, Mammarella N, Borella E, Di Domenico A (2022) “When did you see it?” The effect of emotional valence on temporal source memory in aging. Cogn Emot 36(5):987–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2069683
Ceccato I, Di Crosta A, La Malva P, Cannito L, Mammarella N, Palumbo R, Palumbo R, Di Domenico A (2023) Public opinion in vaccine allocation priority: Who comes first? Psychol Health 38(9):1194–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.2007914
Charles ST (2010) Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychol Bull 136:1068–1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021232
Di Domenico A, Palumbo R, Mammarella N, Fairfield B (2015) Aging and emotional expressions: Is there a positivity bias during dynamic emotion recognition? Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01130
Diamond R, Carey S (1986) Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen 115(2):107–117. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107
Fisk JE, Warr P (1996) Age and working memory: the role of perceptual speed, the central executive, and the phonological loop. Psychol Aging 11(2):316–323. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.11.2.316
Fusi G, Palmiero M, Lavolpe S, Colautti L, Crepaldi M, Antonietti A, Di Domenico A, Colombo B, Di Crosta A, La Malva P, Rozzini L, Rusconi ML (2022) Aging and psychological well-being: the possible role of inhibition skills. Healthcare 10(8):1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081477
Johnson MH (2005) Subcortical face processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(10):766–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1766
Kumar D, Srinivasan N (2011) Emotion perception is mediated by spatial frequency content. Emotion (washington, D.c.) 11(5):1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025453
Lacroix A, Nalborczyk L, Dutheil F, Kovarski K, Chokron S, Garrido M, Gomot M, Mermillod M (2021) High spatial frequency filtered primes hastens happy faces categorisation in autistic adults. Brain Cogn 155:105811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105811
Laeng B, Profeti I, Saether L, Adolfsdottir S, Lundervold AJ, Vangberg T, Øvervoll M, Johnsen SH, Waterloo K (2010) Invisible expressions evoke core impressions. Emotion (washington, D.c.) 10(4):573–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018689
Laeng B, Sæther L, Holmlund T, Wang CEA, Waterloo K, Eisemann M, Halvorsen M (2013) Invisible emotional expressions influence social judgments and pupillary responses of both depressed and non-depressed individuals. Front Psychol 4:291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00291
LeDoux JE (1996) The emotional brain: the mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon & Schuster, New York, p 384
Leppänen JM, Hietanen JK (2004) Positive facial expressions are recognised faster than negative facial expressions, but why? Psychol Res 69(1–2):22–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0157-2
Lundqvist D, Flykt A, Öhman A (1998) Karolinska directed emotional faces. - KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, ISBN 91-630-7164-9
Mammarella N, Di Domenico A, Fairfield B (2016a) Aging and the genetic road towards the positivity effect in memory. Exp Gerontol 82:120–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.06.011
Mammarella N, Di Domenico A, Palumbo R, Fairfield B (2016b) Noradrenergic modulation of emotional memory in aging. Ageing Res Rev 27:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.03.004
Mammarella N, Di Domenico A, Palumbo R, Fairfield B (2016c) When green is positive and red is negative: aging and the influence of color on emotional memories. Psychol Aging 31(8):914–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000122
Mammarella N, Di Domenico A, Palumbo R, Fairfield B (2017) Self-generation and positivity effects following transcranial random noise stimulation in medial prefrontal cortex: a reality monitoring task in older adults. Cortex 91:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.005
Mather M (2016) The affective neuroscience of aging. Annu Rev Psychol 67:213–238. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033540
Mather M, Knight M (2005) Goal-directed memory: the role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional memory. Psychol Aging 20:554–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.554
Meinhardt-Injac B, Persike M, Meinhardt G (2014) Holistic processing and reliance on global viewing strategies in older adults’ face perception. Acta Physiol 151:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.001
Morris JS, Ohman A, Dolan RJ (1999) A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating «unseen» fear. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(4):1680–1685. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680
Neta M, Berkebile MM, Freeman JB (2021) The dynamic process of ambiguous emotion perception. Cognit Emot 35(4):722–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1862063
Pellicano E, Rhodes G (2003) Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults. Psychol Sci 14(6):618–622. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1474.x
Petro NM, Basyouni R, Neta M (2021) Positivity effect in aging: evidence for the primacy of positive responses to emotional ambiguity. Neurobiol Aging 106:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.06.015
Prete G, Laeng B, Tommasi L (2014) Lateralised hybrid faces: evidence of a valence-specific bias in the processing of implicit emotions. Laterality 19(4):439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2013.862255
Prete G, Capotosto P, Zappasodi F, Laeng B, Tommasi L (2015a) The cerebral correlates of subliminal emotions: an eleoencephalographic study with emotional hybrid faces. Eur J Neurosci 42(11):2952–2962. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13078
Prete G, D’Ascenzo S, Laeng B, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L (2015b) Conscious and unconscious processing of facial expressions: evidence from two split-brain patients. J Neuropsychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12034
Prete G, Laeng B, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L (2015c) Right hemisphere or valence hypothesis, or both? The processing of hybrid faces in the intact and callosotomized brain. Neuropsychologia 68:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.002
Prete G, Marzoli D, Tommasi L (2015d) Upright or inverted, entire or exploded: right-hemispheric superiority in face recognition withstands multiple spatial manipulations. PeerJ 3:e1456. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1456
Prete G, Laeng B, Tommasi L (2018) Modulating adaptation to emotional faces by spatial frequency filtering. Psychol Res 82(2):310–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0830-x
Prete G, Laeng B, Tommasi L (2019) Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over prefrontal cortex does not influence the evaluation of facial emotions. Soc Neurosci 14(6):676–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2018.1546226
Psalta L, Andrews TJ (2014) Inversion improves the recognition of facial expression in thatcherized images. Perception 43(8):715–730. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7755
Psalta L, Young AW, Thompson P, Andrews TJ (2014) Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. J vis 14(12):9. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.12.9
Ramanoël S, Kauffmann L, Cousin E, Dojat M, Peyrin C (2015) Age-related differences in spatial frequency processing during scene categorization. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0134554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134554
Reed AE, Carstensen LL (2012) The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Front Psychol 3:339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339
Reed AE, Chan L, Mikels JA (2014) Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychol Aging 29:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035194
Reid VM, Dunn K, Young RJ, Amu J, Donovan T, Reissland N (2017) The human fetus preferentially engages with face-like visual stimuli. Curr Biol CB 27(12):1825-1828.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044
Ruffman T, Henry JD, Livingstone V, Phillips LH (2008) A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(4):863–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001
Schiller D, Alessandra NC, Alia-Klein N, Becker S, Cromwell HC, Dolcos F, Eslinger PJ, Frewen P, Kemp AH, Pace-Schott EF, Raber J (2024) The human affectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 158:105405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450
Schyns PG, Oliva A (1994) From blobs to boundary edges: evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychol Sci 5:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x
Smith FW, Schyns PG (2009) Smile through your fear and sadness: transmitting and identifying facial expression signals over a range of viewing distances. Psychol Sci 20(10):1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02427.x
Snodgrass JG, Corwin J (1988) Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J Exp Psychol Gen 117(1):34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34
Tommasi V, Prete G, Tommasi L (2021) The role of low spatial frequencies in facial emotion processing: a study on anorthoscopic perception. Vis Cogn 29(8):519–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1966150
van den Boomen C, Munsters NM, Kemner C (2019) Emotion processing in the infant brain: the importance of local information. Neuropsychologia 126:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.006
Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2003) Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nat Neurosci 6(6):624–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1057
Wang Y, Chen J, Ku Y (2021) Subliminal affective priming effect: dissociated processes for intense versus normal facial expressions. Brain Cogn 148:105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105674
Williams MA, Morris AP, McGlone F, Abbott DF, Mattingley JB (2004) Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. J Neurosci off J Soc Neurosci 24(12):2898–2904. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4977-03.2004
Zebrowitz LA, Franklin RG, Palumbo R (2015) Ailing voters advance attractive congressional candidates. Evolut Psychol 13(1):16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300102