Designing a forest-energy policy to reduce forest fires in Galicia (Spain): A contingent valuation application

Journal of Forest Economics - Tập 16 - Trang 217-233 - 2010
Mario Soliño1, Albino Prada2, María X. Vázquez2
1Forest Research Centre (CIFOR), National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA), Ctra. de La Coruña km. 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2Department of Applied Economics, University of Vigo, Lagoas Marcosende s/n, 36310 Vigo, Spain

Tài liệu tham khảo

Álvarez-Farizo, 1999, Estimating the benefits of agri-environmental policy: econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42, 23, 10.1080/09640569911280 Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4601 Bateman, 2002 Bergmann, 2006, Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments, Energy Policy, 34, 1004, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.035 Boyle, 1993, The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent valuation studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 80, 10.1006/jeem.1993.1034 Brown, 1996, Response formats and public good donations, Land Economics, 72, 152, 10.2307/3146963 Byrnes, 1999, Contingent valuation and real economic commitments: evidence from electric utility green pricing programmes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42, 149, 10.1080/09640569911190 Champ, 2006, Are actual donations to the provision of a public good sensitive to the elicitation format?, Land Economics, 82, 162, 10.3368/le.82.2.162 Chas-Amil, 2007, Forest fires in Galicia (Spain): threats and challenges for the future, Journal of Forest Economics, 13, 1, 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.02.001 Chas-Amil, 2007, Forest fires in Galicia (Spain): a reply, Journal of Forest Economics, 13, 211, 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.09.001 Ciriacy-Wantrup, 1947, Capital returns from soil conservation practices, Journal of Farm Economics, 29, 1181, 10.2307/1232747 CNE, 2004 2007, 13, 291 Dziegielewska, 2007, Does ‘No’ mean ‘No’? A protest methodology, Environmental and Resource Economics, 38, 71, 10.1007/s10640-006-9057-4 Ek, K., 2005. The economics of renewable energy support. Ph.D. Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Division of Economics. Ethier, 2000, A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for green-pricing electricity programs, Land Economics, 76, 54, 10.2307/3147257 Fernandes, 2008, Forest fires in Galicia (Spain): the outcome of unbalanced fire management, Journal of Forest Economics, 14, 155, 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.11.002 Fisher, 1996, The conceptual underpinnings of the contingent valuation method González-Cabán, 2007, A comparison of CVM survey response rates, protests and willingness-to-pay of Native Americans and general population for fuels reduction policies, Journal of Forest Economics, 13, 49, 10.1016/j.jfe.2006.10.001 Halstead, 1992, Protest bidders in contingent valuation, Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics, 21, 160, 10.1017/S0899367X00002683 Halvorsen, 1999, Differences between willingness-to-pay estimates from open-ended and discrete-choice contingent valuation methods: the effects of heteroscedasticity, Land Economics, 74, 262, 10.2307/3147055 Hanley, 1999, Appraising renewable energy developments in remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate, Scotland, Energy Policy, 27, 527, 10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00023-3 Hanley, N., Bergmann, A., Kim, Y-J., 2006. The environmental impacts of renewable energy: an investigation of public preferences. Mimeo, University of Stirling. Heckman, 1979, Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47, 153, 10.2307/1912352 Hicks, 1943, The four consumer's surpluses, Review of Economic Studies, 13, 68, 10.2307/2296037 Huang, 1998, Monte Carlo benchmarks for discrete response valuation methods, Land Economics, 74, 186, 10.2307/3147050 Ivanova, I., 2005. Queensland consumers’ willingness to pay for electricity from renewable energy sources. In: ANZSEE Conference, New Zealand Centre for Ecological Economics, December 11–13. Jensen, K., Menard, J., English, B., Jakus, P., 2004. An Analysis of the residential preferences for green power-the role of bioenergy. In: Farm Foundation Conference on Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Energy, June 24–25. Johansson, 1996, Commodity prices as payment vehicles in valuation experiments, Environmental and Resource Economics, 8, 247, 10.1007/BF00357366 Jorgensen, 1999, Protest responses in contingent valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics, 14, 131, 10.1023/A:1008372522243 Jorgensen, 2000, Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for storm water pollution abatement, Ecological Economics, 33, 251, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00145-7 Kriström, 1993, Comparing continuous and discrete contingent valuation questions, Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 63, 10.1007/BF00338320 Ladenburg, 2007, Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark, Energy Policy, 35, 4059, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.023 Loomis, 1997, Evaluating the validity of the dichotomous choice question format in contingent valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10, 109, 10.1023/A:1026403916622 Loomis, 2005, Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest FIRE prevention among three status of California, Florida and Montana, Journal of Forest Economics, 11, 125, 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.07.003 MacMillan, 2006, Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine?, Ecological Economics, 60, 299, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.031 Mitchell, 2002, On designing constructed markets in valuation surveys, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 297, 10.1023/A:1015571100238 Mitchell, 1989 NOAA, 1996, Natural resource damage assessments; final rule, Federal Register, 15, 439 Núñez-Regueira, 2004, Energy evaluation of forest residues originated from shrub species in Galicia, Bioresource Technology, 91, 215, 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00169-X Ready, 1996, Differences between continuous and discrete contingent valuation estimates, Land Economics, 72, 397, 10.2307/3147205 Rose, 2001, The private provision of public goods: tests of a provision point mechanism for funding green power programs, Resource and Energy Economics, 24, 131, 10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00048-3 Soliño, 2009, Green electricity externalities: forest biomass in an Atlantic European region, Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 407, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.017 Soliño, 2009, Social demand for electricity from forest biomass in Spain: does payment periodicity affect the willingness to pay?, Energy Policy, 37, 531, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.002 Soliño, 2009, The influence of home-site factors on residents’ willingness to pay: an application for power generation from scrubland in Galicia, Spain, Energy Policy, 37, 4055, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.054 Whitehead, 2007, Willingness to pay for a green energy program: a comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches, Resource and Energy Economics, 29, 247, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.10.001 Wiser, 2003 Whittington, 1992, Giving respondents time to think in contingent valuation studies: a developing countries application, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 205, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90029-V