Design requirements, student perception indicators and validation metrics for intelligent exploratory learning environments

Personal Technologies - Tập 17 Số 8 - Trang 1605-1620 - 2013
Manolis Mavrikis1, Sergio Gutiérrez-Santos2, Eirini Geraniou1, Richard Noss1
1London Knowledge Lab, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK
2London Knowledge Lab, Computer Science and Information Systems, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aleven V (2002) An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn Sci 26(2):147–179

Aleven V, Mclaren B, Roll I, Koedinger K (2006) Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: a model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. Int J Artif Intell Edu 16(2):101–128

Arroyo I, Ferguson K, Johns J, Dragon T, Meheranian H, Fisher D, Barto A, Mahadevan S, Woolf BP (2007) Repairing disengagement with non-invasive interventions. In: Proceeding of the 2007 conference on artificial intelligence in education, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 195–202

Baker RS, Corbett AT, Koedinger KR, Wagner AZ (2004) Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students “game the system”. In: CHI ’04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 383–390

Bark I, Folstad A, Gulliksen J (2005) Use and usefulness of HCI methods: results from an exploratory study among nordic HCI practitioners. In: International conference on HCI

Bransford JD, Franks JJ, Vye NJ, Sherwood RD (1989) New approaches to instruction: because wisdom can’t be told. In: Vosniadou S, Ortony A (eds) Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge University Press, New York

Bunt A, Conati C (2003) Probabilistic Student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour. User Model User-Adapt Interact 13:269–309

Chevallard Y (1991) La transposition didactique—Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. La Pensée sauvage (1re éd., 1985), Grenoble

Dempsey JV, Wager SU (1988) A taxonomy for the timing of feedback in computer-based instruction. Educ Technol 28(10):20–25

Disessa AA, Cobb P (2004) Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. J Learn Sci 13(1):77–103

Do-Lenh S, Jermann P, Cuendet S, Zufferey G, Dillenbourg P (2010) Task performance vs. learning outcomes: a study of a tangible user interface in the classroom. In: Wolpers M, Kirschner P, Scheffel M, Lindstaedt S, Dimitrova V (eds) Sustaining TEL: from innovation to learning and practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6383. Springer, Berlin, pp 78–92

Gutierrez-Santos S, Mavrikis M, Magoulas G (2010) Layered development and evaluation for intelligent support in exploratory environments: the case of microworlds. In: Aleven V, Kay J, Mostow J (eds) Intelligent tutoring systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6094. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–114

Healy L, Hoelzl R, Hoyles C, Noss R (1994) Messing up. Micromath 10:14–17

Hoyles C, Sutherland R (1989) Logo mathematics in the classroom. Routledge, London

de van Jong T, Joolingen WR (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev Educ Res 68:179–201

Joolingen WR, Zacharia ZC (2009) Developments in inquiry learning. In: Balacheff N, Ludvigsen S, de Jong T, Lazonder A, Barnes S (eds) Technology-enhanced learning, chap 2, pp 21–37

Kelleher C, Pausch R (2005) Stencils-based tutorials: design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, NY, CHI ’05, pp 541–550

Kirschner P, Sweller J, Clark RE (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol 41(2):75–86

Kynigos C (1992) Insights into pupils’ and teachers’ activities in pupil-controlled problem-solving situations. In: Information technology and mathematics problem solving: research in contexts of practice, NATO ASI Series, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 219–238

Lesh R, Kelly AE (1996) A constructivist model for redesigning AI tutors in mathematics. In: Laborde JM (eds) Intelligent learning environments: the case of geometry. Springer, New York

Mason J (2008) Being mathematical with and in front of learners: attention, awareness, and attitude as sources of differences between teacher educators, teachers and learners. In: Wood (ed) International handbook of mathematics teacher education, vol 4. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam

Mavrikis M (2004) Improving the effectiveness of interactive open learning environments. In: 3rd hellenic conference on artificial intelligence—companion volume, pp 260–269

Mavrikis M, Gutierrez-Santos S (2010) Not all wizards are from Oz: iterative design of intelligent learning environments by communication capacity tapering. Comput Educ 54(3):641–651

Mavrikis M, Noss R, Geraniou E, Hoyles C (2012) Sowing the seeds of algebraic generalisation: designing epistemic affordances for an intelligent microworld. J Comput Assist Learn (in press)

Mayer RE (2004) Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?—the case for guided methods of instruction. Am Psychol 59(1):14–19

Noss R, Hoyles C (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. Kluwer, Dordrecht

Noss R, Poulovassilis A, Geraniou E, Gutierrez-Santos S, Hoyles C, Kahn K, Magoulas GD, Mavrikis M (2012) The design of a system to support exploratory learning of algebraic generalisation. Comput Educ 59(1):63–81

Paramythis A, Weibelzahl S, Masthoff J (2010) Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods. User Model User-Adapt Interact 20(5):383–453

Pontual Falcão T, Price S (2010) Interfering and resolving: how tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 6(4):1–21

Read J, Macfarlane S (2002) Endurability, Engagement and Expectations: Measuring children’s fun. In: Interaction design and children,vol 2. Shaker Publishing, Aachen, pp 1–23

Read JC (2008) Validating the fun toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology. Cogn Technol Work 10(2):119–128

Rounding K, Tee K, Wu X, Guo C, Tse E (2011) Evaluating interfaces with children. In: Child computer interaction. 2nd workshop on UI technologies and educational pedagogy. At ACM CHI 2011, Conference on human factors in computing systems

Scardamalia M, Bereiter C (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. J Learn Sci 1(1):37–68

Tse E, Schöning J, Huber J, Marentette T, Beckwith R, Rogers Y, Mühlhäuse M (2011) Child computer interaction. 2nd workshop on UI technologies and educational pedagogy. At ACM CHI 2011, Conference on human factors in computing systems

Wood H, Wood D (1999) Help seeking, learning and contigent tutoring. Comput Educ 33:153–169

Zayas Pérez B, Cox R (2009) Teaching safety precautions in a laboratory DVE: the effects of information location and interactivity. Computacion y Sistemas (special issue on ’Innovative applications of artificial intelligence’) 13:96–110