Design for adaptability (DFAD)—a new concept for achieving sustainable design

Emblemsvag J, Bras B. Activity-based costing in design for product retirement. In: American society of mechanical engineers, design engineering division (Publication). New York NY, USA: ASME; 1994.

Johnson, 1995

Seo, 2002, Approximate estimation of the product life cycle cost using artificial neural networks in conceptual design, Int J Adv Manu Technol, 19, 461, 10.1007/s001700200049

Tipnis, 1994, Challenges in product strategy, product planning and technology development for product life cycle design, CIRP Annuals, 43, 157, 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62186-6

Antonios C, Inman DJ, Samali A. Experimental and theoretical behavior of self-healing bolted joints. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, in press.

Peairs, 2004, Practical issues of activating self-repairing bolted joints, Smart Mater Struct, 13, 1414, 10.1088/0964-1726/13/6/012

Hmelo CE, et al. Problem-based course in sustainable technology. Proceedings of frontiers in education conference, Piscataway, NJ, USA; 1995.

Emblemsvag, 1999

Henstock, 1988

Sutherland, 2004, A global perspective on the environmental challenges facing the automotive industry: state-of-the-art and directions for the future, Int J Vehicle Des, 35, 86, 10.1504/IJVD.2004.004050

Carlier, 2003

Otto, 2001

Rajan, 2005, An empirical foundation for product flexibility, Des Stud, 26, 405, 10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.007

Amezquita T, et al. Characterizing the remanufacturability of engineering systems. In: American society of mechanical engineers, design engineering division (Publication) DE, Boston, MA, USA; 1995.

Bras, 1999, Product, process, and organizational design for remanufacture—an overview of research, Robot Comput-integrated Manuf, 15, 167, 10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00021-6

Reap J, Bras B. Design for disassembly and the value of robotic semi-destructive disassembly. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Montreal, Que., Canada. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2002.

Shu, 1999, Application of a design-for-remanufacture framework to the selection of product life-cycle fastening and joining methods, Robot Comput-integrated Manuf, 15, 179, 10.1016/S0736-5845(98)00032-5

Shu LH, Flowers WC. Structured approach to design for remanufacture. In: American society of mechanical engineers, design engineering division (Publication) DE, New Orleans, LA, USA. New York, NY, USA: ASME; 1993.

Shu, 1995

Sundin, 2005, Making functional sales environmentally and economically beneficial through product remanufacturing, J Cleaner Prod, 13, 913, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.04.006

Clausing, 2005, Improving system reliability by failure-mode avoidance including four concept design strategies, Syst Eng, 8, 245, 10.1002/sys.20034

Lu Y, et al. Reliability-focused parts selection in derivative product-development- processes. IEEE international engineering management conference, Singapore. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2004.

Shu, 1998, Reliability modeling in design for remanufacture, J Mech Des, 120, 620, 10.1115/1.2829324

Rajan PK, et al. Empirical study on project flexibility. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference and comput. and Inf. in Eng. Conference, vol. 3, 2004. p. 109–24.

Carone MJ, et al. An application of nonstructural theory ion the multi-objective design of product platforms. Proceeding of the ASME design engineering technical conference, vol. 3; 2003.

Hernandez, 2003, Platform design for customizable products as a problem of access in a geometric space, Eng Optim, 35, 229, 10.1080/0305215031000105013

Lipson H, Pollack JB, Suh NP. Promoting modularity in evolutionary design. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 2001.

Newcomb, 1998, Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle, J Mech Des, 120, 483, 10.1115/1.2829177

Panchal JH, et al. Designing design processes in product lifecycle management: Research issues and strategies. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2004.

Seepersad CC, Mistree F, Allen JK. A quantitative approach for designing multiple product platforms for an evolving portfolio of products. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Montreal, Que., Canada; 2002.

Simpson, 1999, A concept exploration method for product platform and product family design, Optim Ind, 2, 371

Simpson, 2001, Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family, Concurrent Eng Res Appl, 9, 177, 10.1106/T4H4-E0AT-P6XL-0U7H

Williams CB, et al. Designing platforms for customizable products in markets with non-uniform demand. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2004.

Josias, 2004

Suh, 2004, On functional periodicity as the basis for long-term stability of engineered and natural systems and its relationship to physical laws, Res Eng Des, 15, 72, 10.1007/s00163-003-0045-1

Doyle, 1992