Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty
Tóm tắt
Preoperative radiographic templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be inaccurate. Patient demographic data, such as gender, height, weight, age, and race, may be more predictive of implanted component size in TKA.
A multivariate linear regression model was designed to predict implanted femoral and tibial component size using demographic data along a consecutive series of 201 patients undergoing index TKA. Traditional, two-dimensional, radiographic templating was compared to demographic-based regression predictions on a prospective 181 consecutive patients undergoing index TKA in their ability to accurately predict intraoperative implanted sizes. Surgeons were blinded of any predictions.
Patient gender, height, weight, age, and ethnicity/race were predictive of implanted TKA component size. The regression model more accurately predicted implanted component size compared to radiographically templated sizes for both the femoral (
A demographic-based regression model was created based on patient-specific demographic data to predict femoral and tibial TKA component sizes. In a prospective patient series, the regression model more accurately and precisely predicted implanted component sizes compared to radiographic templating.
Prospective cohort, level II.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aslam N, Lo S, Nagarajah K, Pasapula C, Akmal M (2004) Reliability of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 70(6):560–564
The B, Diercks RL, Van Ooijen PM, Van Horn JR (2005) Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop 76(1):78–84
Howcroft DW, Fehily MJ, Peck C, Fox A, Dillon B, Johnson DS (2006) The role of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of three prostheses. Knee. 13(6):427–429
Specht LM, Levitz S, Iorio R, Healy WL, Tilzey JF (2007) A comparison of acetate and digital templating for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:179–183
Unnanuntana A, Arunakul M, Unnanuntana A (2007) The accuracy of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thail 90(11):2338–2343
Trickett RW, Hodgson P, Forster MC, Robertson A (2009) The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(7):903–906
Miller AG, Purtill JJ (2012) Accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 41(11):510–512
Miller AG, Purtill JJ (2012) Total knee arthroplasty component templating: a predictive model. J Arthroplasty 27(9):1707–1709
Sershon RA, Courtney PM, Rosenthal BD, Sporer SM, Levine BR (2017) Can demographic variables accurately predict component sizing in primary total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 32(10):3004–3008
Bhowmik-stoker M, Scholl L, Khlopas A et al (2018) Accurately predicting total knee component size without preoperative radiographs. Surg Technol Int 33:337–342
Ren AN, Neher RE, Bell T, Grimm J (2018) Using patient demographics and statistical modeling to predict knee tibia component sizing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(6):1732–1736
Trainor S, Collins J, Mulvey H, Fitz W (2018) Total knee replacement sizing: shoe size is a better predictor for implant size than body height. Arch Bone Jt Surg 6(2):100–104
Rehman H, Macdonald DRW, Smith M, Zainudin S, Robertson G, Mitchell M (2018) A novel technique for estimating component sizes in total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg 52:7–10
Knight JL, Atwater RD (1992) Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 7:403–409
White SP, Shardlow DL (2005) Effect of introduction of digital radiographic techniques on pre-operative templating in orthopaedic practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87(1):53–54
Bayne CO, Krosin M, Barber TC (2009) Evaluation of the accuracy and use of x-ray markers in digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(3):407–413
Kobayashi A, Ishii Y, Takeda M et al (2012) Comparison of analog 2D and digital 3D preoperative templating for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 17(2):96–101
Kniesel B, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmuller A, Sudkamp N, Kelwig P (2014) Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy. Int Orthop 38(4):733–739
Lorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Hartman A, Healy WL (2009) A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty 24:175–179
Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, Safir O, White L, Gross A et al (2009) Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg 52:6–11
Levine B, Fabi D, Deirmengian C (2010) Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 33:797
Keswani A, Koenig KM, Bozic JK (2016) Value-based healthcare: part 1: designing and implementing integrated practice units for the management of musculoskeletal disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:2100–2103
Keswani A, Koenig KM, Ward L, Bozic JK (2016) Value-based healthcare: part 2: addressing the obstacles to implementing integrated practice units for the management of musculoskeletal disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:2344–2348
Sershon RA, Li J, Calkins TE, Coutney M, Nam D, Gerlinger TL, Sporer SM, Levine BR (2019) Prospective validation of a demographically based primary total knee arthroplasty size calculator. J Arthroplasty 34(7):1369–1373