Democracy, rule of law, and corporate governance—a liquidity perspective

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 18 - Trang 35-70 - 2016
Naiwei Chen1, Tsai-Chen Yang2
1International Institute for Financial Research, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China
2Department of Finance, National Chung Cheng University, Min-Hsiung Township, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

This study examines whether and how democracy and rule of law—two overarching country-level governance variables—influence corporate governance. Given that corporate liquidity (cash holdings) is a good channel for examining the quality of corporate governance, the effects of democracy and rule of law on corporate governance can be identified using the liquidity approach. A review of 67 countries from 1996 to 2010 demonstrates that democracy and rule of law indeed have bearings on corporate governance. More specifically, results indicate that firms are more inclined to hoard cash to take advantage of growth opportunities when the level of democracy is higher or rule of law is stronger, suggesting that agency costs are lower and interests of managers and shareholders are more aligned under such circumstances. In addition, the negative effect of debt issuance and dividend payment on cash is more pronounced when the level of democracy is higher or rule of law is stronger, suggesting that these two approaches become more effective in reducing agency costs and transitively cash holdings under such circumstances. Moreover, the positive effect of democracy and rule of law on corporate governance appears to be reinforced when rule of law is stronger and the level of democracy is higher, respectively. Furthermore, higher level of economic development helps reap the benefit of democracy and rule of law in terms of improving corporate governance and reducing agency costs.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acharya VV, Almeida H, Campello M (2007) Is cash negative debt? A hedging perspective on corporate financial policies. J Financ Intermed 16:515–554 Almeida H, Campello M, Weisbach MS (2004) The cash flow sensitivity of cash. J Finance 59:1777–1804 Bates TW, Kahle KM, Stulz RM (2009) Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? J Finance 64:1985–2021 Chang K, Noorbakhsh A (2009) Does national culture affect international corporate cash holdings? J Multinatl Financ Manag 19:323–342 Chen KCW, Chen Z, Wei KCJ (2011) Agency costs of free cash flow and the effect of shareholder rights on the implied cost of equity capital. J Financ Quant Anal 46:171–207 Cooper SM (2007) Corporate governance in developing countries: shortcomings, challenges, and effect on credit. In: Modern law for global commerce, congress to celebrate the fortieth annual session of UNCITRAL, Vienna, 9–12 July 2007 Cremers M, Ferrell A (2014) Thirty years of shareholder rights and firm valuation. J Finance 69:1167–1196 de Tocqueville A (2000) [1830] Democracy in America. In: Mansfield H, Winthrop D (eds) The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Dennis DK, McConnell JJ (2003) International corporate governance. J Financ Quant Anal 38:1–36 Dittmar A, Mahrt-Smith J (2007) Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. J Financ Econ 83:599–634 Dittmar A, Mahrt-Smith J, Servaes H (2003) International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings. J Financ Quant Anal 38:111–133 Doidge C, Karolyi GA, Stulz RM (2007) Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? J Financ Econ 86:1–39 Donelson DC, Yust CG (2013) Litigation risk and agency costs: evidence from Nevada corporate law (March 1, 2013). Working Paper Driver C, Thompson G (2002) Corporate governance and democracy: the stakeholder debate revisited. J Manag Gov 6:111–130 Drobetz W, Gruninger MC (2007) Corporate cash holdings: evidence from Switzerland. Financ Mark Portf Manag 21:293–324 Edwards J, Fischer K (1994) Banks, finance and investment in West Germany since 1970. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Falaschetti D (2009) Shareholder democracy and corporate governance. Rev Bank Financ Law 28:553–580 Ferreira M, Vilela A (2004) Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from EMU countries. Eur Financ Manag 10:295–319 Fligstein N, Choo J (2005) Law and corporate governance. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 1:61–84 Gamba A, Triantis AJ (2014) How effectively can debt covenants alleviate financial agency problems? Working Paper Gomez P, Korine H (2005) Democracy and the evolution of corporate governance. Corp Gov 13:739–752 Gorton G, Schmid F (2000) Universal banking and the performance of German firms. J Financ Econ 58:29–80 Harford J, Mansi SA, Maxwell WF (2008) Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. J Financ Econ 87:535–555 Huang P, Zhang Y (2008) Does enhanced disclosure really reduce agency costs? Evidence from the value of corporate cash holdings and dividends. Paper presented at the 2007 European Finance Association Annual Meetings Huang Y, Elkinawy S, Jain PK (2013) Investor protection and cash holdings: Evidence from US cross-listing. J Bank Financ 37:937–951 International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2012) Coping with high debt and sluggish growth. World, Economic Outlook October 2012 Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76:323–329 Kalcheva I, Lins KV (2007) International evidence on cash holdings and expected managerial agency problems. Rev Financ Stud 20:1087–1112 Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 5430 Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York Kuipers DR, Miller DP, Patel A (2009) The legal environment and corporate valuation: evidence from cross-border takeovers. Int Rev Econ Finance 18:552–567 La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. J Finance 52:1131–1150 La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106:1113–1155 La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J Finance 54:471–517 La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2000a) Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. J Finance 55:1–33 La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2000b) Investor protection and corporate governance. J Financ Econ 58:3–27 La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2006) What works in securities laws? J Financ Econ 61:1–32 Licht AN, Goldschmidt C, Schwartz SH (2005) Culture, law, and corporate governance. Int Rev Law Econ 25:229–255 Luo Q, Hachiya T (2005) Corporate governance, cash holdings, and firm value: evidence from Japan. Rev Pacific Basin Financ Mark Polic 8:613–636 Mijiyawa AG (2013) Determinants of property rights institutions: survey of literature and new evidence. Econ Gov 14:127–183 Munck GL (2003) Measures of democracy, governance and rule of law: an overview of cross-national data sets. Paper prepared for the World Bank workshop Understanding Growth and Freedom from the Bottom Up, Washington, DC, 15–17 July 2003 Myers SC, Majluf N (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13:187–221 OECD (2004) OECD Principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing, Paris Opler T, Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, Williamson R (1999) The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. J Financ Econ 52:3–46 Ozkan A, Ozkan N (2004) Corporate cash holdings: an empirical investigation of UK companies. J Bank Finance 28:2103–2134 Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, Williamson R (2006) Does the contribution of corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on governance? A cross-country analysis. J Finance 61:2725–2751 Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Finance 52:737–783 Shyam-Sunder L, Myers SC (1999) Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. J Financ Econ 51:219–244 Tong Z (2011) Firm diversification and value of cash holdings. J Corp Finance 17:741–758 Ward AJ, Brown JA, Rodriguez D (2009) Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corp Gov 17:646–660 Yermack D (2010) Shareholder voting and corporate governance. Annu Rev Financ Econ 2:103–125 Yun H (2009) The choice of corporate liquidity and corporate governance. Rev Financ Stud 22:1447–1475