Delivery room management of extremely preterm infants: the EPIPAGE-2 study

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition - Tập 101 Số 5 - Trang F384-F390 - 2016
Julie Perlbarg1, Pierre‐Yves Ancel2,3, Babak Khoshnood2, Mélanie Durox2, Pascal Boileau4,5, M. Garel2, Michał F. Kamiński2, François Goffinet6,2, Laurence Foix‐L’Hélias2,7
1Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (U1153), Inserm, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
2Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (U1153), INSERM, Paris, France
3URC-CIC P1419, DHU Risk in Pregnancy, Cochin Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
4EA 7285, Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Versailles, France
5Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, CHI Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France
6Maternité Port-Royal, Paris-Descartes University, Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, DHU Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France
7Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Costeloe, 2000, The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability, Pediatrics, 106, 659, 10.1542/peds.106.4.659

Larroque, 2004, Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 89, F139, 10.1136/adc.2002.020396

Vanhaesebrouck, 2004, The EPIBEL study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in Belgium, Pediatrics, 114, 663, 10.1542/peds.2003-0903-L

EXPRESS Group, 2010, Incidence of and risk factors for neonatal morbidity after active perinatal care: extremely preterm infants study in Sweden (EXPRESS), Acta Paediatr, 99, 978, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01846.x

Costeloe, 2012, Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies), BMJ, 345, e7976, 10.1136/bmj.e7976

Field, 2008, Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994–9 compared with 2000–5, BMJ, 336, 1221, 10.1136/bmj.39555.670718.BE

Fischer, 2009, Survival rates of extremely preterm infants (gestational age<26 weeks) in Switzerland: impact of the Swiss guidelines for the care of infants born at the limit of viability, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 94, F407, 10.1136/adc.2008.154567

Guillén, 2015, Guidelines for the management of extremely premature deliveries: a systematic review, Pediatrics, 136, 343, 10.1542/peds.2015-0542

Gallagher, 2014, European variation in decision-making and parental involvement during preterm birth, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 99, F245, 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305191

Pignotti, 2008, Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: an international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births, Pediatrics, 121, e193, 10.1542/peds.2007-0513

Pignotti, 2007, Perinatal care at an extremely low gestational age (22–25 weeks). An Italian approach: the “Carta di Firenze, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 92, F515, 10.1136/adc.2007.119446

MacDonald, 2002, Perinatal care at the threshold of viability, Pediatrics, 110, 1024, 10.1542/peds.110.5.1024

Dageville, 2011, The French Society of Neonatology's proposals for neonatal end-of-life decision-making, Neonatology, 100, 206, 10.1159/000324119

Wilkinson, 2009, Management of babies born extremely preterm at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 94, F2, 10.1136/adc.2008.143321

Berger, 2011, Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations, Swiss Med Wkly, 141, w13280

Fellman, 2009, One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden, JAMA, 301, 2225, 10.1001/jama.2009.771

Itabashi, 2009, Mortality rates for extremely low birth weight infants born in Japan in 2005, Pediatrics, 123, 445, 10.1542/peds.2008-0763

Ancel, 2015, Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study, JAMA Pediatr, 169, 230, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3351

Brunkhorst, 2014, Infants of borderline viability: the ethics of delivery room care, Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 19, 290, 10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.001

Tyson, 2008, Intensive care for extreme prematurity--moving beyond gestational age, N Engl J Med, 358, 1672, 10.1056/NEJMoa073059

Janvier, 2012, Antenatal counselling for parents facing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence, Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992, 101, 800

Ancel, 2014, EPIPAGE 2: a preterm birth cohort in France in 2011, BMC Pediatr, 14, 97, 10.1186/1471-2431-14-97

Sanagou, 2012, Hospital-level associations with 30-day patient mortality after cardiac surgery: a tutorial on the application and interpretation of marginal and multilevel logistic regression, BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, 28, 10.1186/1471-2288-12-28

Stoll, 2010, Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Pediatrics, 126, 443, 10.1542/peds.2009-2959

Doyle, 2010, Outcomes at age 2 years of infants <28 weeks’ gestational age born in Victoria in 2005, J Pediatr, 156, 49, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.013

Janvier, 2013, Saving vs creating: perceptions of intensive care at different ages and the potential for injustice, J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc, 33, 333, 10.1038/jp.2012.134

Staub, 2014, Our child is not just a gestational age. A first-hand account of what parents want and need to know before premature birth, Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992, 103, 1035

Lapeyre, 2004, [Very preterm infant (< 32 weeks) vs very low birth weight newborns (1500 grammes): comparison of two cohorts], Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off Sociéte Fr Pédiatrie, 11, 412, 10.1016/j.arcped.2004.02.013