Defining, measuring and interpreting the appropriateness of humanitarian assistance
Tóm tắt
This paper presents findings from a literature review of methods that explicitly assess the appropriateness of a humanitarian response. We set out to highlight the key features and limitations of each method and introduce a definition and conceptual framework for the measurement and interpretation of the appropriateness of humanitarian responses. This review is part of a broader project to enhance the accountability of humanitarian responses through developing auditing approaches for real-time monitoring. We identified eight methods that explicitly analyse the appropriateness of a humanitarian response. The review revealed that existing methods vary considerably in their definitions of ‘appropriateness’, provide insufficient guidance on measurement, are vulnerable to interpretive bias and frequently report findings on ‘appropriateness’ in an ambiguous manner. These findings suggest that, as a matter of accountability, more structured and systematic approaches to measuring the appropriateness of humanitarian response are needed. We propose a definition and conceptual framework for the measurement and interpretation of the appropriateness of humanitarian response that seeks to address the limitations identified in the review. We provide a brief overview of the main components and features of a systematic approach and audit tool for assessing the ‘appropriateness’ of a humanitarian response. The use of this and other systematic approaches is essential for enhancing governance and accountability in humanitarian responses.
Tài liệu tham khảo
ACF International (2011) Evaluation Policy & Guideline. ACF International https://www.alnap.org/help-library/acf-evaluations-policy-and-guidelines. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
ALNAP (2006) Evaluating humanitarian action using the OECD-DAC criteria. Overseas Development Institute https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/eha-2006.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Apanga S, Titi Addebah G, Chirawurah D (2017) Listening to the voices of the people: community's assessment of disaster responder agency performance during disaster situations in rural Northern Ghana PLoS. Curr 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.4226abe816b2746df13d16ea307b5846
Ayoo S, Njigua L, Roiron V (2018) Evaluation of the IFRC West Africa ebola viral disease appeal response: Sierra Leone And Liberia. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/IFRC%20EVD%20final%20evaluation%20report.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Buchanan-Smith M, Cosgrave J, Warner W (2016) Evaluation of humanitarian action guide. ALNAP https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/alnap-evaluation-humanitarian-action-2016.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
CHS Alliance (2014) Core humanitarian standard on quality and accountability. https://corehumanitarianstandard.org/files/files/Core%20Humanitarian%20Standard%20-%20English.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
CHS Alliance (2015) CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators. https://corehumanitarianstandard.org/files/files/CHS-Guidance-Notes-and-Indicators.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
CHS Alliance (2016) Self-assessment tool: core humanitarian standard on quality & accountability. CHS Alliance https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/CHS_Alliance-Self-Assessment_Tool_v1_3-06July2016.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Cosgrave J, Ramalingam B, Beck T (2009) Real-time evaluations of humanitarian action: An ALNAP Guide (Pilot Version). Overseas Development Institute https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/rteguide.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Darcy J (2003) Measuring humanitarian need: a critical review of needs assessment practice and its influence on resource allocation. Overseas Development Institute - Humanitarian Policy Group https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4899.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Darcy J, Hofmann C (2003) According to need? Needs assessment and decision-making in the humanitarian sector. Overseas Development Institute - Humanitarian Policy Group https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/285.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Darcy J, Stobaugh H, Walker P, Maxwell D (2013) The use of evidence in humanitarian decision making: ACAPS operational learning paper. Feinstein International Center https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/tufts-1306-acaps-3-online.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Deboutte D, Mach O, Rossi L (2005) Interagency health evaluation burundi—health and nutrition in the humanitarian context. United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees (UNHCR) https://www.alnap.org/help-library/interagency-health-evaluation-burundi-health-and-nutrition-in-the-humanitarian-context. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Development Assistance Committee (1999) Guidance for evaluating humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/2667294.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Evaluation Unit (2009) Guidelines for project and programme evaluations. Austrian development agency https://www.entwicklung.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente/Projektabwicklung/Englisch/Guidelines_for_Project_and_Progamme_Evaluations.PDF. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Froud A (2016) “Strengths in unity”: a real time evaluation of an MSF collaborative approach to a meningitis outbreak in Niger. Médecins Sans Frontières: Stockholm Evaluation Unit. https://www.alnap.org/help-library/%E2%80%9Cstrengths-in-unity%E2%80%9D-a-real-time-evaluation-of-an-msf-collaborative-approach-to-a. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Hallam A, Bonino F (2013) Using evaluation for a change: insights from humanitarian practitioners. ALNAP/ODI https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/alnap-study-using-evaluation-for-a-change.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2018
IFRC Secretariat, Planning and Evaluation Department (2011) IFRC Framework for Evaluation https://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/monitoring/IFRC-Framework-for-Evaluation.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Independent commission for aid impact (2011) ICAI’s approach to effectiveness and value for money https://icai.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/ICAIs-Approach-to-Effectiveness-and-VFM2.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Independent Commission for Aid Impact (2014) Rapid review of DFID’s humanitarian response to typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. https://icai.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/ICAI-Philippines-report-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Independent Commission for Aid Impact (2018) The UK’s humanitarian support to Syria: a performance review. https://icai.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/ICAI-Syria-Report-final.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Interagency health and nutrition evaluations in humanitarian crises initiative (2007) Guidelines for implementing IHE in humanitarian crises. https://www.unhcr.org/47692e3b4.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2014) Inter-agency humanitarian evaluations of large scale system-wide emergencies (IAHE). https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/documents/files/IAHE%20Guidelines.pdf.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
Lawday A, Adjibade K, Dahrendorf N, Kubwayezu F, Morinière LC (2016) Inter-agency humanitarian evaluation of the response to the crisis in the Central African Republic. Steering Group for Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluations. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/evaluations/content/inter-agency-humanitarian-evaluation-response-crisis-central-african-republic. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Michael M, Pearson N, Daliam A (2006) Interagency health evaluation—Chad. United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees (UNHCR). https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/erd-3393-full.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Msuya C, Sondorp E (2005) Interagency health evaluation—Liberia. United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees (UNHCR). https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/erd-3392-full.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Obrecht A, Warner A, Dillon N (2017) Working paper: evaluating humanitarian innovation—a HIF/ALNAP working paper. ALNAP/ODI https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/alnap-hif-evaluating-humanitarian-innovation-2017.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
Oxford Dictionaries (2018) Definition of appropriateness in English. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/appropriateness. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.
RED: Agency for resilience empowerment and development (2018) CBM: core humanitarian standards self-assessment final report. https://www.cbm.org/fileadmin/user_upload/CHS_self_Assessment_report_Executive_Summary_and_scoring_190618.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2019
Singh J, Shah P (n.d.) Community score card process—a short note on the general methodology for implementation. World Bank, Social Development Department. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPCENG/1143333-1116505690049/20509286/comscorecardsnote.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
Thomas M, Obrecht A (2015) Supporting disabled people in emergencies: motivation’s appropriate and affordable wheelchairs. HIF/ALNAP Case Study. ODI/ALNAP. https://www.elrha.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/hif-alnap-motivation-wheelchairs-case-study-2015.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2018
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2015) Accountability to affected populations (AAP). https://emergency.unhcr.org/entry/42554/accountability-to-affected-populations-aap. Accessed 12 July 2019
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2013) Operational Peer Review Guidance. The Interagency Standing Committee (IASC). https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/documents/files/Working%20Draft_Guidance_Operational%20Peer%20Review%2017%20December%202013%20v2.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2018) Inter-agency humanitarian evaluations: process guidelines. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/iahe_guidelines_2018.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2019
Vienna Evaluation Unit (2017) Evaluation Manual: A handbook for initiating, managing and conducting evaluations in MSF. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). https://evaluation.msf.org/sites/evaluation/files/evaluation_manual_online_version_2017.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018
World Food Programme (2017) Evaluation questions and criteria. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/258036f37ecb4a17af7ea8afd212b0f1/download/. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Xavier CA (2014) Impact assessment: emergency wheelchair response in the Philippines. Elrha https://www.elrha.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Impact-AssessmentReport_TX-140730-1.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018
Yila O (2017) Protecting and promoting the food and nutrition security in the Yobe State, Phase II, North Eastern Nigeria. ACF International https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/201708-nigeriab3c-final-evaluation-report_0.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018