Deepening transparency about value-laden assumptions in energy and environmental modelling: improving best practices for both modellers and non-modellers
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arrow K. J., 1996, Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change, contribution of Working Group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Cole W., 2017, Variable renewable energy in long-term planning models: A multi-model perspective
Fleurbaey, M., et al. (2018). International Panel on Social Progress. https://www.ipsp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/IPSP-Executive-Summary.pdf
Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). The emergence of post-normal science. In Science, politics and morality (pp. 85–123). Springer.
Ha-Duong, M. (2001). Transparency and control in engineering integrated assessment models. Integrated Assessment, 2(4), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013384932008
H.M. Treasury. (2015). The Aqua Book: Guidance on producing quality analysis for government. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-aqua-book-guidance-on-producing-quality-analysis-for-government
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Special report on global warming of 1.5 °C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Kelleher J. P., 2017, Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 15, 957
Klein J. T., 1990, Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice
Lind R. C., 1982, Discounting for time and risk in energy policy
Manne A. S., 1993, Buying greenhouse insurance: The economic costs of carbon dioxide emission limits
Mintz-Woo, K. (2018). Moral uncertainty over policy evaluation. PhD dissertation. University of Graz.
MIT. (2009). Greenhouse gamble. https://globalchange.mit.edu/research/research-tools/risk-analysis/greenhouse-gamble
NAS, 2017, Valuing climate damages: Updating estimation of the social cost of carbon dioxide
NREL, 2018, 2018 standard scenarios report: A U.S. electricity sector outlook
Office for Climate Education. (2018). IPCC special report “global warming of 1.5 °C” Summary for teachers. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/12/ST1.5_OCE_LR.pdf
Peng R. D., 2014, Implementing reproducible research
Portney P. R., 1999, Discounting and intergenerational equity
Proctor R. N., 1991, Value-free science: Purity and power in modern knowledge
Rose, S., Diaz, D., Blanford, G., Bistline, J., de la Chesnaye, F. & Wilson, T. (2014). Understanding the social cost of carbon: A technical assessment. (EPRI Report #3002004657). EPRI.
Rose, S. & Scott, M. M. (2018). Grounding decisions: A scientific foundation for companies considering global climate scenarios and greenhouse gas goals. (EPRI Report #3002014510). EPRI.
Sarewitz, D. (2018). Of cold mice and isotopes: Or should we do less science, Bonn Summer School in Higher Education Research and Science Studies. https://sfis.asu.edu/sites/default/files/should_we_do_less_science-revised_distrib.pdf
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2018). Annual energy outlook 2018: Interactive table viewer. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/data/browser/
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Strengthening transparency in regulatory science. EPA–HQ–OA–2018–0259, Federal Register Vol. 83 No. 83. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/18/2020-05012/strengthening-transparency-in-regulatory-science
UCL Energy Institute. (2017). UCL-Energy creates animation explaining model of UK energy system. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/energy/news/2017/jan/ucl-energy-creates-animation-explaining-model-uk-energy-system