Decreased pain in split-thickness skin graft donor sites with the use of a non-adherent polyurethane dressing

Solanki, 2012, A randomised prospective study of split skin graft donor site dressings: AWBAT-D™ vs. Duoderm®, Burns, 38, 889, 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.022 Demirtas, 2010, Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materials, Burns, 36, 999, 10.1016/j.burns.2009.05.017 Janis, 2011, The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model, Plast Reconstr Surg, 127, 205S, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318201271c Gemberling, 1976, Dressing comparison in the healing of donor sites, J Trauma, 16, 812, 10.1097/00005373-197610000-00011 Schwarze, 2007, Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts: results of a clinical study, Burns, 33, 850, 10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.393 Ashburn, 1995, Burn pain: the management of procedure-related pain, J Burn Care Rehabil, 16, 365, 10.1097/00004630-199505001-00006 Barnea, 2004, Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment, Ann Plast Surg, 53, 132, 10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3 Kilinc, 2001, Which dressing for split-thickness skin graft donor sites, Ann Plast Surg, 46, 409, 10.1097/00000637-200104000-00010 Gravante, 2010, A retrospective analysis of ambulatory burn patients: focus on wound dressings and healing times, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 92, 118, 10.1308/003588410X12518836439001 Rakel, 1998, Split-thickness skin graft donor site care: a quantitative synthesis of the research, Appl Nurs Res, 11, 174, 10.1016/S0897-1897(98)80296-6 Cadier, 1996, Dermasorb versus Jelonet in patients with burns skin graft donor sites, J Burn Care Rehabil, 17, 246, 10.1097/00004630-199605000-00012 Prasad, 1987, A prospective controlled trial of Biobrane versus scarlet red on skin graft donor areas, J Burn Care Rehabil, 8, 384, 10.1097/00004630-198709000-00009 White, 2009, Mepitel: a non adherent wound dressing with Safetac technology, Br J Nurs, 18, 58, 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.93582 Less Pain with Safetac. Mölnlycke Health Care, 2003. Available from: http://www.molnlycke.com/patient/en-us/Pain/-/Less-pain-with-Safetac/#How-Safetac-works [accessed 01.09.13]. Kaartinen, 2011, Suprathel® causes less bleeding and scarring than Mepilex® Transfer in the treatment of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts, J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 45, 200, 10.3109/2000656X.2011.583515 Voineskos, 2009, Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings, Plast Reconstr Surg, 124, 298, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a8072f Jellish, 1999, Effect of topical local anesthetic application to skin harvest sites for pain management in burn patients undergoing skin-grafting procedures, Ann Surg, 229, 115, 10.1097/00000658-199901000-00015 Uhlig, 2007, Suprathel-an innovative, resorbable skin substitute for the treatment of burn victims, Burns, 33, 221, 10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.024 Richardson, 2009, The management of pain in the burns unit, Burns, 35, 921, 10.1016/j.burns.2009.03.003 Wasiak, 2008, Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD002106 Selig, 2012, The properties of an ideal burn wound dressing – what do we need in daily clinical practice? Results of a worldwide online survey among burn care specialists, Burns, 38, 960, 10.1016/j.burns.2012.04.007 Wandner, 2012, The perception of pain in others: how gender, race, and age influence pain expectations, J Pain, 13, 220, 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.10.014 Goodyear, 2012, Measuring pain in outpatient surgical patients: variation resulting from instrument choice, Am Surg, 78, 1292, 10.1177/000313481207801141