Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderton, 2002, Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model, Hydrological Processes, 16, 333, 10.1002/hyp.336
Beldring, 2002, Multi-criteria validation of a precipitation-runoff model, Journal of Hydrology, 257, 189, 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00541-8
Bergström, S., 1995. The HBV model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch Co., USA. ISBN No.: 0-918334-91-8.
Bergström, 1998, On the scale problem in hydrological modelling, Journal of Hydrology, 211, 253, 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00248-0
Bergström, 2002, Multi-variable parameter estimation to increase confidence in hydrological modelling, Hydrological Processes, 16, 413, 10.1002/hyp.332
Beven, 1992, The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrological Processes, 6, 279, 10.1002/hyp.3360060305
Beven, 2001, Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems, Journal of Hydrology, 249, 11, 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
BMLFUW, 2007. Hydrological Atlas of Austria, third ed. Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft. ISBN: 3-85437-250-7.
Boyle, D.P., 2000. Multicriteria calibration of hydrological models. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Boyle, 2000, Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resources Research, 36, 3663, 10.1029/2000WR900207
Cao, 2006, Multi-variable and multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability, Hydrological Processes, 20, 1057, 10.1002/hyp.5933
Criss, 2008, Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals, Hydrological Processes, 22, 2723, 10.1002/hyp.7072
Duan, 1992, Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resources Research, 28, 1015, 10.1029/91WR02985
Garrick, 1978, A criterion of efficiency for rainfall-runoff models, Journal of Hydrology, 36, 375, 10.1016/0022-1694(78)90155-5
Gupta, 1998, Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resources Research, 34, 751, 10.1029/97WR03495
Gupta, 2008, Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrological Processes, 22, 3802, 10.1002/hyp.6989
Herbst, 2009, Mapping model behaviour using Self-Organizing Maps, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 395, 10.5194/hess-13-395-2009
Hock, 2003, Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, Journal of Hydrology, 282, 104, 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9
Jain, 2008, Fitting of hydrologic models: a close look at the Nash–Sutcliffe index, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering., 13, 981, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:10(981)
Kling, 2009, On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: the impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability, Journal of Hydrology, 373, 337, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.031
Kling, H., Fürst, J., Nachtnebel, H.P., 2007. Seasonal water balance. In: BMLFUW (Ed.), Hydrological Atlas of Austria, third ed., map sheet 7.2, Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft. ISBN: 3-85437-250-7.
Kling, H., Yilmaz, K.K., Gupta, H.V., 2008. Diagnostic evaluation of a distributed precipitation-runoff model for snow dominated basins (oral presentation). In: American Geophysical Union: AGU Joint Assembly, 27–30th May 2008, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Krause, 2005, Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Advances in Geosciences, 5, 89, 10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005
Legates, 1999, Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model evaluation, Water Resources Research, 35, 233, 10.1029/1998WR900018
Lindström, 1997, A simple automatic calibration routine for the HBV model, Nordic Hydrology, 28, 153, 10.2166/nh.1997.0009
Madsen, 2003, Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives, Advances in Water Resources, 26, 205, 10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00092-1
Marce, 2008, Using spatially distributed parameters and multi-response objective functions to solve parameterization of complex applications of semi-distributed hydrological models, Water Resources Research, 44, 18, 10.1029/2006WR005785
Martinec, 1989, Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrological models, Water Resources Bulletin, AWRA., 25, 421, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1989.tb03079.x
Martinez, G.F., Gupta, H.V., submitted for publication. Continental scale diagnostic evaluation of the ‘abcd’ monthly water balance model for the conterminous US. Water Resources Research.
Mathevet, 2006, A bounded version of the Nash–Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins, 567
McCuen, 1975, A proposed index for comparing hydrographs, Water Resources Research, 11, 1021, 10.1029/WR011i006p01021
McCuen, 2006, Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11, 597, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597)
Merz, 2004, Regionalisation of catchment model parameters, Journal of Hydrology, 287, 95, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028
Murphy, 1988, Skill scores based on the mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient, Monthly Weather Review, 116, 2417, 10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<2417:SSBOTM>2.0.CO;2
Nash, 1970, River flow forecasting through. Part I. A conceptual models discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology., 10, 282, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Parajka, 2005, A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9, 157, 10.5194/hess-9-157-2005
Rode, 2007, Multi-objective calibration of a river water quality model-Information content of calibration data, Ecological Modelling, 204, 129, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.037
Rojanschi, 2005, Using multi-objective optimisation to integrate alpine regions in groundwater flow models, Advances in Geosciences, 5, 19, 10.5194/adgeo-5-19-2005
Safari, A., De Smedt, F., Moreda, F., 2009. WetSpa model application in the Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP2). Journal of Hydrology, in press.
Thornthwaite, 1957, Instructions and tables for computing potential evaporation and the water balance, Publications in Climatology, 10, 311
Tolson, 2007, Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration, Water Resources Research, 43, 16, 10.1029/2005WR004723
van Griensven, 2003, Multiobjective autocalibration for semidistributed water quality models, Water Resources Research, 39, 9, 10.1029/2003WR002284
Wang, 2009, Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China, Water Resources Research, 45, 12, 10.1029/2007WR006768
Weglarczyk, 1998, The interdependence and applicability of some statistical quality measures for hydrological models, Journal of Hydrology, 206, 98, 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00094-8
Yilmaz, 2008, A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model, Water Resources Research, 44, 18, 10.1029/2007WR006716