Giải Mã Quyền Tác Giả: Liệu Có Thực Sự Không Có Nơi Chốn Cho Tác Giả Thuật Toán Dưới Luật Sở Hữu Trí Tuệ?

Abdoullaev A (2019) Universal artificial intelligence, and how much might cost real AI model. 27 November https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/european-ai-alliance/universal-artificial-intelligence-and-how-much-might-cost-real-ai-model.html Amory H (1984) “De facto copyright”? Fielding's works in partnership, 1769-1821. Eighteenth Century Stud 17(4):449–476 Aplin T, Pasqualetto G et al (2019) Anticlerical intelligent and copyright protection. In: Ballardini (ed) et al. Regulating industrial internet through IPR, data protection and competition law. Wolters Kluwer, Amsterdam Asay CD (2020) Independent creation in a world of AI. Florida Int Uni Law Rev 14(2):201–222 Bastian MJ (1999) Protection of “noncreative” databases: harmonization of United States, foreign and international law. Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev 22(2):425–463 Beebe B (2017) Bleistein, the problem of aesthetic progress, and the making of American copyright law. Colum Law Rev 117(2):319–397 Boden MA (2003) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms, 2nd edn. Routledge, London Boyle J (2003) The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law Contemp Probs 66(1/2):33–74 Bracha O (2008) The ideology of authorship revisited: authors, markets, and liberal values in early American copyright. Yale Law J 118(2):186–271 Bridy A (2012) Coding creativity: copyright and the artificially intelligent author. Stan Technol Law Rev 5:1–28 Calvino I (1982) The uses of literature. (Patrick Creagh trans). Harcourt, San Diego Carroll MW (2019) Copyright and the progress of science: why text and data mining is lawful. UC Davis Law Rev 53(2):893–964 Craig CJ (2022) The AI copyright challenge: tech neutrality, authorship, and the public interest. In: Abbott R, Geffen D (eds) Research handbook on intellectual property and artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Dinwoodie GB (2002) The architecture of the international intellectual property system. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 77(2):993–1014 Dunn K (1994) Pretexts of authorship: the rhetoric of authorship in the Renaissance preface. Stanford University Press, Stanford Franzosi M, De Sanctis G (1995) Moral rights and new technology: are copyright and patents converging? Eur Intell Prop Rev 17(2):63 Fromer JC (2012) Expressive incentives in intellectual property. Va Law Rev 98(8):1745–1824 Geldart WM (1911) Legal personality. Law Q Rev 27:90–108 Gervais DJ (2017) (Re)Structuring copyright: a comprehensive path to international copyright reform 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Ginsburg JC (2018) People not machines: authorship and what it means in the Berne Convention. IIC Int Rev Intell Prop Competition Law 49:131–135 Ginsburg JC (2003) The concept of authorship in comparative copyright law. Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Group (Paper Number 03-51). https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2280&context=faculty_scholarship. 1–29 Greenberg BA (2016) Rethinking technology neutrality. Minnesota. Law Rev 100:1495–1562 Greenleaf GW, Lindsay D (2018) Public rights: copyright’s public domains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Grimmelmann J (2016) There’s no such thing as a computer-authored work – and it’s a good thing, too. Colum J Law & Arts 39(3):403–416 Hugenholtz PB, Quintais JP (2021) Copyright and artificial creation: does EU copyright law protect AI-assisted output? IIC Int Rev Intell Prop Competition Law 52:1190–1216 James A (2006) Automatism, arbitrariness, and the Oulipian author. French Forum 31(2):111–125 Jaszi P (1991) Towards a theory of copyright – metamorphoses of “Authorship.” Duke Law J 1991(2):455–502 Kaminski ME (2017) Authorship, disrupted: AI authors in copyright and first amendment law. UC Davis Law Rev 51:589–616 Killian M (2003) A hollow victory for the common law? TRIPS and the moral rights exclusion. J Marshall Rev Intell Prop Law 2:321–336 Kraye J (1996) The Cambridge companion to Renaissance humanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Lessig L (2008) Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin Press, New York, pp 51–83 Litman J (2007) Lawful personal use. Texas Law Rev 85(7):1871–1920 Mccorduck P (1979) Machines who think: a personal inquiry into the history and prospects of artificial intelligence. WH Freeman & Company, New York Merges RP (1999) The law and economics of employee invention. Harv J Law Technol 13(1):1–54 Motte WF, Jr (ed and trans, 1986) Oulipo: a primer of potential literature. University of Nebraska Press, Nebraska Palfrey J, Gasser U (2008) Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books, New York, pp 111–129 Rajan MTS (2011) Moral rights: principles, practice and new technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 227–282 Ramalho O (2019) Originality redux: an analysis of the originality requirement in AI-generated works. AIDA 28:2–18 Raustiala K, Sprigman C (2006) The piracy paradox: innovation and intellectual property in fashion design. Va Law Rev 92:1687–1777 Ricketson S (1991) People or machines: the Berne Convention and the changing concept of authorship. Colum-VLA J Law Arts 16(1):1–38 Ricketson S, Ginsburg JC (2006) International copyright and neighbouring rights: the Berne Convention and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford Rigamonti CP (2006) Destructing moral rights. Harv Int Law J 47(2):353–413 Rolnick AJ, Weber WE (1986) Gresham’s law or Gresham’s fallacy. J Polit Econ 94(1):185–199 Rosenblatt EL (2011) A theory of IP’s negative space. Colum J Law Arts 34(3):317–365 Sauer RM (2007) Why develop open source software? The role of non-pecuniary benefits, monetary rewards and open source licence type. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3197. https://docs.iza.org/dp3197.pdf Schéré E (2018) Where is the morality? Moral rights in international intellectual property law and trade law. Fordham Int Law J 41(3):773–784 Senftleben MRF (2022) Study on EU copyright and related rights and access to and reuse of data. Publications Office, Luxembourg Silbey JM (2015) The Eureka myth: creators, innovators and everyday intellectual property. Stanford University Press, Stanford Tom SM et al (2007) The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 315(5811):515–518 Verbruggen F et al (2017) Winning and losing: effects on impulsive action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 43(1):147–168 Wachter S, Mittelstadt B (2019) A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Colum Bus Law Rev 2:494–620 Woodmansee M (1984) The genius and the copyright: economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “author.” Eighteenth Century Stud 17(4):425–448 Yen AC (1998) Copyright opinions and aesthetic theory. Southern Cal Law Rev 71:247–302