Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement

Allais M. (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546

Al-Najjar, N. I., & Weinstein J. (2009). The ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment, Kellogg School of Management Working Paper, Northwestern University.

Atmanspacher H. (2003) Mind and matter as asymptotically disjoint inequivalent representations with broken time-reversal symmetry. Biosystems 68: 19–30

Atmanspacher H., Römer H., Walach H. (2002) Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundation of Physics 22: 379–406

Bather J. (2000) Decision theory. Wiley, Chichester

Barkan R., Danziger S., Ben-Bashat G., Busemeyer J. R. (2005) Framing reference points: The effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency. Journal of Behaal Decision Making 18: 213–226

Baron J. (1998) Judgement misguided: Intuition and error in public decision-making. Oxford University, Oxford

Bechara A., Damasio H., Damasio A. (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10: 295–307

Beck F., Eccles J. (1992) Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA, 89: 11357–11361

Bell J. S. (1964) On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1: 195–200

Benioff P. A. (1972) Decision procedures in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics 13: 909–915

Benjamin S. C., Hayden P. M. (2001) Multi-player quantum games. Physical Review A 64: 030301

Berger J. O. (1985) Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. Springer, New York

Bohr N. (1929) Wirkungsquantum und Naturbeschreibung. Naturwissenschaft 17: 483–486

Bohr, N. (1933). Light and life. Nature, 131, 421–423, 457–459.

Bohr N. (1937) Kausalität und Komplemetarität. Erkenntnissenscahft 6: 293–303

Bohr N. (1961) La Physique Atomique et la Connaissance Humaine. Gontier, Genève

Buchanan J. T. (1982) Discrete and dynamic decision analysis. Wiley, Chichester

Busemeyer J. R., Wang Z., Townsend J. T. (2006) Quantum dynamics of human decision- making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50: 220–241

Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., Rabin, R. (eds) (2003) Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University, Princeton

Chalmers D. (1996) The conscious mind. Oxford University, Oxford

Charness, G. B., Levin, D., & Karni, E. (2008). On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgement: New experimental evidence. Department of Economics Working Paper, UCSB.

Cohen M., Tallon J. M. (2000) Décision dans le risque et l’incertain: l’apport des modèles non additifs. Revue d’Economie Politique 110: 631–681

Croson R. T. A. (1999) The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 80: 118–133

Dickhaut J., McCabe K., Nagode J.C., Rustichini A., Smith K., Pardo J.V. (2003) The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA 100: 3536–3541

Dieudonné J. (2006) Foundations of modern analysis. Hesperides, London

Dirac P. A. M. (1958) The principles of quantum mechanics. Clarendon, Oxford

Du J., Li H., Xu X., Shi M., Wu J., Zhou X., Han R. (2002) Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer. Physical review letters 88: 137902

Du J., Xu X., Li H., Zhou X., Han R. (2001) Entanglement playing a dominating role in quantum games. Physics Letters A 289: 9–15

Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 47: 777–780

Eisert J., Wilkens M. (2000) Quantum games. Journal of Modern Optics 47: 2543–2556

Epstein L. G. (1999) A definition of uncertainty aversion. The Review of Economic Studies 66: 579–608

Feller W. (1970) Introduction to probability theory and its applications. Wiley, New York

Fox C., Rogers B., Tversky A. (1996) Option traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13: 5–17

Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T. (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351–401

French S., Insua D. R. (2000) Statistical decision theory. Arnold, London

Frölich H. (1968) Bose condensation of strongly excited longitudinal electric modes. Physics Letters A 26: 402–403

Gilboa I. (1987) Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16: 65–88

Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153

Goldenberg L., Vaidman L., Wiesner S. (1999) Quantum gambling. Physical Review Letters 82: 3356–3359

Hagan S., Hameroff S. R., Tuszynski J. A. (2002) Quantum computation in brain microtubules: Decoherence and biological feasibility. Physical Review E 65: 061901

Hastings N. A., Mello J. M. (1978) Decision networks. Wiley, Chichester

Iqbal A., Toor A. H. (2001) Evolutionally stable strategies in quantum games. Physics Letters A 280: 249–256

Johnson N. F. (2001) Playing a quantum game with a corrupted source. Physical Review A 63: 020302

Kaplan S., Garrick B. J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1: 11–27

Kühberger A., Komunska D., Perner J. (2001) The disjunction effect: Does it exist for two-step gambles?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85: 250–264

Lambdin C., Burdsal C. (2007) The disjunction effect reexamined: Relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103: 268–276

Lee C. F., Johnson N. F. (2003) Efficiency and formalism of quantum games. Physical Review A 67: 022311

Li C. F., Zhang Y. S., Huang Y. F., Guo G. C. (2001) Quantum strategies of quantum measurements. Physics Letters A 280: 257–260

Li S., Taplin J. E., Zhang Y. (2007) The equate-to-differentiate way of seeing the prisoner’s dilemma. Information Sciences 177: 1395–1412

Lindgren B. W. (1971) Elements of decision theory. Macmillan, New York

Lockwood M. (1989) Mind, brain and the quantum. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

Machina M. J. (2008) Non-expected utility theory. In: Durlauf S. N., Blume L. E. (eds) The new palgrave dictionary of economics. Macmillan, Basingstoke

Marshall K. T., Oliver R. M. (1995) Decision making and forecasting. McGraw-Hill, New York

Mendelson E. (1965) Introduction to mathematical logic. Van Nostrand, Princeton

Meyer D. (1999) Quantum strategies. Physical Review Letters 82: 1052–1055

Montesano A. (2008) Effects of uncertainty aversion on the call option market. Theory and Decision 65: 97–123

Morier D. M., Borgida E. (1984) The conjunction fallacy: A task-specific phenomenon?. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin 10: 243–253

Penrose R. (1989) The emperor’s new mind. Oxford University, Oxford

Pessa E., Vitiello G. (2003) Quantum noise, entanglement and chaos in the quantum field theory of mind-brain states. Mind and Matter 1: 59–79

Primas H. (2003) Time-entanglement between mind and matter. Mind and Matter 1: 81–119

Quiggin J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–343

Raiffa H., Schlaifer R. (2000) Applied statistical decision theory. Wiley, New York

Rivett P. (1980) Model building for decision analysis. Wiley, Chichester

Rottenstreich Y., Tversky A. (1997) Unpacking, repacking and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review 104: 406–415

Safra Z., Segal U. (2008) Calibration results for non-expected utility theories. Econometrica 76: 1143–1166

Satinover J. (2001) The quantum brain. Wiley, New York

Savage L. J. (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York

Schmeidler D. (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57: 571–587

Shafir E. (1994) Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition 50: 403–430

Shafir E., Simonson I., Tversky A. (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49: 11–36

Shafir E., Tversky A. (1992) Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology 24: 449–474

Shafir E. B., Smith E. E., Osherson D. N. (1990) Typicality and reasoning fallacies. Memory and Cognition 18: 229–239

Sheremeta, R. M., & Zhang, J. (2009). Can groups solve the problem of over-building in contests? Department of Economics Working Paper, McMaster University.

Shor P. (1997) Polynomial-type algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing 26: 1484–1494

Simon H. A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118

Sornette D., Davis A.B., Ide K., Vixie K.R., Pisarenko V., Kamm J.R. (2007) Algorithm for model validation: Theory and applications. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA 104: 6562–6567

Stapp H. P. (1993) Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics. Springer, Berlin

Stapp H. P. (1999) Attention, intention, and will in quantum physics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6: 143–164

Stuart C. I. J., Takahashi Y., Umezawa H. (1978) On the stability and non-local properties of memory. Journal of Theoretical Biology 71: 605–618

Stuart C. I. J., Takahashi Y., Umezawa H. (1979) Mixed system brain dynamics: Neural memory as a macroscopic ordered state. Foundations of Physics 9: 301–327

Tegmark M. (2000) Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E 61: 4194–4205

Tentori K., Bonini N., Osherson D. (2004) The conjunction fallacy: A misunderstanding about conjunction?. Cognitive Science 28: 467–477

Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–232

Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1980) Judgements of and by representativeness. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. (eds) Judgements under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University, New York, pp 84–98

Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review 90: 293–315

Tversky A., Koehler D. (1994) Support theory: A nonexistential representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 101: 547–567

Tversky A., Shafir E. (1992) The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science 3: 305–309

van Enk S. J., Pike R. (2002) Classical rules in quantum games. Physical Review A 66: 024306

Vitiello G. (1995) Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model. International Journal of Modern Physics B 9: 973–989

von Neumann J. (1955) Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton University, Princeton

von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University, Princeton

Wells G. L. (1985) The conjunction error and the representativeness heuristic. Social Cognition 3: 266–279

Weirich P. (2001) Decision space. Cambridge University, Cambridge

White D. I. (1976) Fundamentals of decision theory. Elsevier, New York

Yates J. F., Carlson B. W. (1986) Conjunction errors: Evidence for multiple judgement procedures, including signed summation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37: 230–253

Yukalov V. I. (1975) Causality problem in quantum physics. Philosophical Sciences 18: 145–147

Yukalov V. I. (2003a) Entanglement measure for composite systems. Physical Review Letters 90: 167905

Yukalov V. I. (2003b) Quantifying entanglement production of quantum operations. Physical Review A 68: 022109

Yukalov V. I. (2003c) Evolutional entanglement in nonequilibrium processes. Modern Physics Letters B 17: 95–103

Yukalov V. I., Sornette D. (2008) Quantum decision theory as quantum theory of measurement. Physics Letters A 372: 6867–6871

Yukalov V. I., Sornette D. (2009a) Scheme of thinking quantum systems. Laser Physics Letters 6: 833–839

Yukalov V. I., Sornette D. (2009b) Physics of risk and uncertainty in quantum decision making. European Physical Journal B 71: 533–548

Zeckhauser R. (2006) Investing in the unknown and unknowable. Capitalism and Society 1: 1–39