Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism

British Journal of Political Science - Tập 25 Số 3 - Trang 289-325 - 1995
George Tsebelis1
1University of California at, Los Angeles

Tóm tắt

The article compares different political systems with respect to one property: their capacity to produce policy change. I define the basic concept of the article, the ‘veto player’: veto players are individual or collective actors whose agreement (by majority rule for collective actors) is required for a change of the status quo. Two categories of veto players are identified in the article: institutional and partisan. Institutional veto players (president, chambers) exist in presidential systems while partisan veto players (parties) exist at least in parliamentary systems. Westminster systems, dominant party systems and single-party minority governments have only one veto player, while coalitions in parliamentary systems, presidential or federal systems have multiple veto players. The potential for policy change decreases with the number of veto players, the lack of congruence (dissimilarity of policy positions among veto players) and the cohesion (similarity of policy positions among the constituent units of each veto player) of these players. The veto player framework produces results different from existing theories in comparative politics, but congruent with existing empirical studies. In addition, it permits comparisons across different political and party systems. Finally, the veto player framework enables predictions about government instability (in parliamentary systems) or regime instability (in presidential systems); these predictions are supported by available evidence.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Tsebelis George , ‘Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies’

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies.

10.1007/BF00297059

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies.

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies, p. 29.

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?, pp. 100–50.

Weingast Barry , ‘Economic Role of Political Institutions’ (mimeo, Hoover Institution, 1993).

10.1016/0144-8188(92)90031-L

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies.

10.2307/1344630

Laver and Schofield , Multiparty Government, p. 70.

Horowitz , ‘Comparing Democratic Systems’.

Mastias, 1987, Les Secondes Chambres du parlement en Europe occidentale

Tsebelis , ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter’.

Moe Terry M. and Caldwell Michael , ‘The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government’.

Tsebelis , ‘The Core, the Uncovered Set and Conference Committees in Bicameral Legislatures’)

Lohmann Susanne , ‘Federalism and Central Bank Autonomy: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1960–89’ (mimeo, UCLA, 1993)).

Jones David R. , ‘Policy Stability in the United States: Divided Government or Cohesion in Congress?’ (mimeo UCLA, 1993).

Immergut, 1992, Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?, p. 448.

10.1177/0010414093025004004

Linz , ‘The Perils of Presidentialism’.

Pierson Paul D. and Weaver R. Kent , ‘Imposing Losses in Pension Policy’

Bagehot, 1867, The English Constitution

Schick , ‘Governments versus Budget Deficits’, p. 228–9.

Weaver, 1993, Do Institutions Matter? Goverment Capabilities in the US and Abroad, 6

10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.213

Lijphart , Democracies

Tsebelis , Nested Games, chap. 6.

Weingast Barry , ‘Federalism and the Political Commitment to Sustain Markets’ (mimeo, Hoover Institution, 1993).

10.2307/1958776

Katzenstein, 1985, Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?, pp. 187–236.

Moe, 1994, The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 171

Lijphart , Democracies.

10.1093/pan/2.1.131

‘Politicians, Parties and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Politics, 23 (1991), 21–43.

Kreppel Amie , ‘The Effect of Veto Players and Coalition Stability on Legislative Output in Italy’ (mimeo, UCLA, 1993).

10.2307/1962770

Tsebelis George , ‘The Core, the Uncovered Set and Conference Committees in Bicameral Legislatures’ (paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1993).

Powell, 1982, Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence, 10.4159/9780674042353

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?

Hammond and Miller , ‘The Core of the Constitution’.

Eneloe, 1975, The Politics of Pollution in a Comparative Perspective: Ecology and Power in Four Nations, 326

Union, 1986, Parliaments of the World

10.1177/0951692889001004001

Luebbert, 1986, Comparative Democracy: Policy Making and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel, 10.7312/lueb90704

10.2307/1962583

Sartori, 1976, Parties and Party Systems

Money and Tsebelis , ‘Cicero's Puzzle’, Tables 1 and 2.

10.2307/2944885

10.1177/0010414092025003003

10.1353/jod.1990.0056

Bagehot , The English Constitution.

Strom , Minority Government and Majority Rule

10.1086/257839

Huber John D. and Powell G. Bingham , ‘Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in two Visions of Liberal Democracy’, World Politics, forthcoming.

10.1177/019251219201300103

‘The Merits of Bicameralism’, International Review of Law and Economics, 12 (1992), 166–8

Doering Herber , ed. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (New York: St Martin's Press, forthcoming).

Maor , ‘Intra-Party Conflict and Coalitional Behavior in Denmark and Norway’, p. 108.

10.1016/0144-8188(92)90032-M

10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t

Riker , ‘The Justification of Bicameralism’

Lange, 1989, State, Market and Social Regulation

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?, pp. 42–109.

Downs, 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy

Strom, 1990, Minority Government and Majority Rule

Schick , ‘Governments versus Budget Deficits’, p. 217.

Montesquieu, 1989, The Spirit of the Laws

10.1177/019251219201300107

Hamilton Alexander , Jay John and Madison James , The Federalist

10.1017/CBO9781139173988

10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x

10.2307/1964130

Downs, 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy

10.1007/BF01395724

Strom , Minority Government and Majority Rule, p. 61.

Laver and Schofield , Multiparty Government

Levmore , ‘Bicameralism’.

Strom , Minority Government and Majority Rule.

Ames, 1987, Political Survival in Latin America, 10.1525/9780520314887

10.1007/978-1-349-22368-8

Tsebelis, 1990, Nested Games

Money and Tsebelis , ‘Cicero's Puzzle’.

Lijphart, 1992, Parliamentary vs. Presidential Government, 6

10.2307/2111325

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies, p. 155.

Rogowski , ‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’.

Key, 1964, Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 688

10.1086/260580

Lijphart , Democracies

Tsebelis , Nested Games

10.4159/harvard.9780674493285

Mainwaring, 1989, Presidentialism in Latin America: A Review Essay, Latin American Research Review, 25, 157, 10.1017/S0023879100023256

Mershon Carol , ‘Expectations and Informal Rules in Coalition Formation’, Comparative Political Studies, forthcoming.

Linz , ‘The Perils of Presidentialism’.

Lijphart , Democracies, pp. 95–100.

Linz, 1990, The Perils of Presidentialism, Journal of Democracy, 1, 51, 10.1353/jod.2005.0026

Feigenbaum Harvey , Samuels Richard and Weaver R. Kent , ‘Innovation, Coordination, and Implementation in Energy Policy’

Feigenbaum , ‘Innovation, Coordination, and Implementation’, p. 99.

Laver and Shepsle , ‘Coalitions and Cabinet Governments’

Mayhew, 1991, Divided We Govern

Stone, 1992, The Birth of Judicial Politics in France, 10.1093/oso/9780195070347.001.0001

Przeworski Adam and Limongi Fernando , ‘Selection, Counterfactual and Comparisons’ (mimeo, University of Chicago)

Hammond Thomas H. and Knott Jack H. , ‘Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy Making’ (paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1993).

Weaver and Rockman , Do Institutions Matter?, p. 450.

Tsebelis George , ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter’, in D. Ruloff and G. Schneider, eds, Towards a New Europe: Stops and Starts in European Integration (New York: Praeger, forthcoming).

Money and Tsebelis , ‘Cicero's Puzzle’.

10.1111/j.1467-9477.1992.tb00133.x

Schick Allen , ‘Governments versus Budget Deficits’

Wilson, 1973, Congressional Government

10.1017/S0020818300027442

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies, p. 44.

Shugart and Carey , Presidents and Assemblies, pp. 154–8.

Riker , ‘The Merits of Bicameralism’