Decentralization and centralization
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this article is to examine the governance of activation in relation to the decentralization and centralization of activation for social assistance recipients in Sweden, The Netherlands and the UK.
This paper outlines broad trends in the governance of activation policies in Europe, focusing on processes of decentralization and centralization in Sweden (characterized by a context of shifting national and local level governance of policies, cultivated within a strong tradition of active labour market policies); The Netherlands (where there has been a deliberate shift in governance towards the local level); and the UK (typified by highly centralized decision making in policy design but local variation in delivery).
The comparison identified different paths of decentralization and examines how these processes interact and overlap with modes of centralization/coordination of policies. Finally, the paper demonstrates the interface between the modes of decentralization and centralization.
The investigation of vertical changes in the governance of activation in three country case studies provides an original in‐depth analysis of types and paths of decentralization and centralization.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bergmark, Å. and Minas, R. (2010), “Actors and governance arrangements in the field of social assistance”, in Kazepov, Y. (Ed.), Rescaling of Social Welfare Policies: A Comparative Study on the Path Towards Multi‐level Governance in Europe, Ashgate, London, pp. 240‐74.
Bouckaert, G. and Pollitt, C. (2000), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bredgaard, R. and Larsen, F. (2009), “Redesigning the governance of employment policies – decentralised centralisation in municipal jobcentres”, in Larsen, F. and Berkel, R. (Eds), The New Governance and Implementation of Labour Market Policies, DJØF, Copenhagen, pp. 45‐69.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2007), “The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67 No. 6, pp. 1059‐66.
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997), The Managerial State, Sage, London.
De Vries, M.S. (2000), “The rise and fall of decentralization: a comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 38, pp. 193‐224.
Ditch, J. and Roberts, E. (2002), Integrated Approaches to Active Welfare and Employment Policies, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.
Finn, D. and Schulte, B. (2008), “Employment first: activating the British welfare state”, in Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O. and Konle‐Seidl, R. (Eds), Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences With Activation Schemes in Europe and the US, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 297‐344.
Karjalainen, V. and Saikku, P. (2011), “Governance of integrated activation policy in Finland”, in van Berkel, R., de Graaf, W. and Sirovátka, T. (Eds), The Governance of Active Welfare States in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 216‐37.
Larsen, F. and van Berkel, R. (2009), “Introduction”, in Larsen, F. and Berkel, R. (Eds), The New Governance and Implementation of Labour Market Policies, DJØF, Copenhagen, pp. 7‐17.
Minas, R. (2010), “(Re)centralizing tendencies within health care services: implementation of a new idea?”, Working Paper/Institute for Futures Studies, p. 9.
Minas, R. and Overby, E. (2010), “The territorial organization of European social assistance schemes”, in Kazepov, Y. (Ed.), Rescaling of Social Welfare Policies: A Comparative Study on the Path Towards Multi‐level Governance in Europe, Ashgate, London, pp. 203‐40.
Mosley, H. (2003), “Flexibility and accountability in labour market policy: a synthesis”, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, OECD, Paris, pp. 131‐57.
Mosley, H. (2009), “Decentralisation and local flexibility in employment services”, in Larsen, F. and van Berkel, R. (Eds), The New Governance and Implementation of Labour Market Policies, DJØF, Copenhagen, pp. 165‐86.
Newman, J. (2007), “The ‘double dynamics’ of activation – institutions, citizens and the remaking of welfare governance”, International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, Vol. 27 Nos 9/10, pp. 364‐75.
OECD (1999), Decentralising Employment Policy: New Trends and Challenges, OECD, Paris.
OECD (2003), Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, OECD, Paris.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.
Page, E. and Goldsmith, M. (1987), Central and Local Government Relations, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Peters, G. (2008), Two Futures of Governing. Decentering and Recentering Processes in Governing, Political Science Series 114, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.
Pierson, P. (2000), “Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics”, American Political Science Review, June, pp. 251‐67.
Pollitt, C. (2005), “Decentralization: a central concept in contemporary public management”, in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. and Pollitt, C. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 371‐97.
Pollitt, C., Birchall, J. and Putnam, K. (1998), Decentralising Public Service Management, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1999), Control and Power in Central‐local Government Relationships, 2nd ed., Aldershot, Ashgate.
van Berkel, R. (2006), “The decentralization of social assistance in The Netherlands”, International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, Vol. 26 Nos 1/2, pp. 20‐32.
van Berkel, R. and Borghi, V. (2008), “Introduction: the governance of activation”, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 331‐40.
van Berkel, R., de Graaf, W. and Sirovátka, T. (2011), “The governance of active welfare states”, in van Berkel, R., de Graaf, W. and Sirovátka, T. (Eds), The Governance of Active Welfare States in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 1‐21.
World Bank (2001), available at: www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/admin.htm.
Wright, S. (2011), “Steering with sticks, rowing for rewards: the new governance of activation in the UK”, in van Berkel, R., de Graaf, W. and Sirovátka, T. (Eds), The Governance of Active Welfare States in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 85‐109.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2010), “Complexity and hybrid public administration – theoretical and empirical challenges”, Public Organization Review, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 407‐24.