Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Khả năng di động dữ liệu và tính tương tác: So sánh giữa EU và Mỹ
Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Trang 1-17 - 2023
Tóm tắt
Khả năng di động dữ liệu (khả năng chuyển giao dữ liệu mà không ảnh hưởng đến nội dung của nó) và tính tương tác (khả năng tích hợp hai hoặc nhiều bộ dữ liệu) có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến việc sử dụng dữ liệu, với những hệ quả quan trọng đối với chính sách chống độc quyền. Việc cho phép cải thiện khả năng di động dữ liệu có thể tạo điều kiện thuận lợi cho tính tương tác, từ đó cho phép người tiêu dùng chuyển đổi dịch vụ, tăng cường cạnh tranh một cách đáng kể. Tuy nhiên, những rào cản đối với khả năng di động và tính tương tác của dữ liệu có thể gia tăng sức mạnh thị trường và trở thành nguyên nhân chính gây ra sự kém hiệu quả xã hội. Bài báo này trình bày những lợi ích và bất lợi của việc hướng tới các yêu cầu về tính tương tác và khả năng di động của dữ liệu, đồng thời so sánh sự chuyển biến này tại Mỹ và tại EU.
Từ khóa
#khả năng di động dữ liệu #tính tương tác #chính sách chống độc quyền #cạnh tranh #hiệu quả xã hộiTài liệu tham khảo
Besen, S., & Farrell, J. (1994). Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization, 8 J. Econ. Persp. 117.
Blockx, J. (2023). The expected impact of the DMA on the Antitrust Enforcement of Unilateral Practices. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpad028.
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation & Access (2010). Sustainable economics for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-term Access to Digital Information https://www.cs.rpi.edu/~bermaf/BRTF_Final_Report.pdf.
Borgogno, O., & Colangelo, G. (2019). Data sharing and interoperability: Fostering competition through APIs,35 Comput. L. & Sec. Rev.
Bradford, A. (2021). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.
Cabral, L. (2018). Standing on the Shoulders of Dwarfs: Dominant Firms and Innovation Incentives, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP13115 (August).
Centre on Regulation in Europe (2022). Making data portability more effective for the digital economy, cerre.eu/publications/report-making-data-portability-more-effective-digital-economy/.
Colangelo, G. (2023). The Digital Markets Act and EU Antitrust Enforcement: Double Triple Jeopardy, visited (August 10, 2023).
Cremer, J., de Montjoye, Y., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, and Schweizer, H Competition Policy for the Digital Era, European Commission, Chap. 5.
Data Portability Project, http://www.dataportability.orgur.J.L. & Tech. 1.
De Hert, P., Papakonstantinou, V., Malgieri, G., Beslay, L., & Sanchez, I. (2018). The right to data portability in the gdpr: Towards user-centric interoperability of digital services. Comput Law Secur Rev, 34(2), 193–203.
Dunne, N. (2021). Competition and Regulation Competition Enforcement and Regulatory Alternatives, submitted to the OECD.
Engels, B. (2016). Data Portability among Online Platforms. Internet Policy Rev, 5, 1.
European Commission (2015a). A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe, 14–15.
European Commission (2015b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a Thriving Data-Driven Economy, 14–15, COM.
Ezrachi, A., & Stucke, M. (2016). Virtual Competition: The Promises and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy.
Fair, G. (2023). Our Work to Move Data Portability Forward, The Keyword (Sept. 21).
Fernandez, C. (2021). A new kid on the block: How will competition law get along with the DMA? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(4), 271–272.
Fletcher, A., Scott Morton, F. M., Crawford, G. S., Crémer, J., Dinielli, D., Heidhues, P., Schnitzer, M., & Seim, K. (2021). Equitable Interoperability: The ‘Super Tool’ of Digital Platform Governance. (Digital Regulation Project - Policy Discussion Paper; No. 4). Yale University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923602.
Gal, M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2017). Access barriers to big data, 59 Ariz. Law Review, 339.
Gal, M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2019). Data standardization, 94 N.Y.U. Law Review, 737.
Geiregat, S. (2022). Copyright meets Consumer Data Portability Rights: Inevitable friction between IP and the remedies in the Digital Content Directive. GUR International, 71(6), 495–515.
Gulati-Gilbert, S., & Seamans, R. (2023). Data portability and interoperability: A primer on two policy tools for regulation of digitized industries. Brookings.
Harvard Law Review. (2018). Cooperation or Resistance? The role of tech companies in Government Surveillance. Chapter One, 13, 1722.
Hodgson, M. (2022). How do you implement interoperability in a DMA world? https://matrix.org/blog/2022/03/29/.
Hoffman, J., & Gonzelez Otero, B. (2020). Demystifying the Role of Data Interoperability in the Access and Sharing Debate (Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 2016, 2020).
Hovenkamp, H. (2022). A Miser’s Rule of Reason: The Supreme Court and Antitrust Limits on Student Athlete Compensation, 78 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv Am L 1.
Hurwitz, G. (2020). Digital Duty to Deal, Data Portability, and, Interoperablity. https://gaidigitalreport.com/author/gushurwitz.
Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2020). Democratic federalism: The Economics, Politics, and Law of Federal Governance. Princeton University Press.
Kahn, L. (2019). The separation of platforms and commerce, 119 Columbia. Law Review, 973.
Kerber, W. (2019). Data sharing in IOT ecosystems and competition law: The example of connected cars. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 381.
Kerber, W., & Schweitzer, H. (2017). Interoperability in the Digital Economy, 8 J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Electronic Comm. 39.
Kramer, J. (2020). Personal Data Portability in the platform economy: Economic Implications and Policy Recommendations. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 17, 263–308.
Kramer, J., Senellart, P., & de Streel, A. (2020). Making data portability more effective for the Digital Economy. Economic Implications and Regulatory Challenges.
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2017). Can Big Data protect a firm from competition? Competition Policy Int’l.
Lynskey, O. (2017). Aligning Data Protection Rights with Competition Law Remedies: The GDPR Right to Data Portability, 42 Eur. L. Rev. 793.us.
Neu, M. (2021). Music Business Needs Interoperability, Reprtoir.
OECD (2021). Data portability, interoperability and digital platform competition, OECD Competition Committee Discussion Paper, http://oe.cd/dpic.
Ratliff, J., Rubinfeld, D. L., (2014), Is there a market for organic search engine results and can their manipulation give rise to antitrust liability? Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 517.
Riley, C. (2023). Portability, not Doctrine, is Key to unlock user Agency for Data. C:I Antitrust Chronicle.
Schweitzer, H., & Welker, R. (2019). Competition Policy for the Digital era. CPI Antitrust Chronicle.
Stucke, M., & Grunes, A. (2016). Big Data and Competition Policy.
Sullivan, C. (2011). Digital Identity: An Emergent Legal Concept, 113 – 16.
Swire, P., & Lagos, Y. (2013). Why the right to data portability likely reduces Consumer Welfare, 72 Maryland L. Rev 335.
Syrmoudis, E., Mager, S., Kuebler-Wachendorff, S., Pizzinini, P., Grossklags, J., & Kranz, J. (2021). Data portability between online services: An empirical analysis on the effectiveness of GDPR Art 20. Proc Priv Enhanc Technol, 3, 351–372.
Tropina, T., & Callanan, C. (2015). Self- and Co-regulation in Cybercrime, Cybersecurity and National Security, 14.
Tucker, C. (2019). Online Advertising and Antitrust: Network Effects, switching costs, and data as an essential facility. CPI Antitrust Chronicle (April).
Turner, V. A. (2022). The EU Digital Markets AI – A New Dawn for Digital Markets, ABA Antitrust Magazine, Volume 37, Issue 1, Fall.
Vanberg, A. D., & Unver, M. B. (2017). The right to data portability in the GDPR and EU Competition Law: Odd couple or dynamic duo? 8 Eur. J. L. & Tech. 1.
Werden, G. J., & Froeb, L. M. (2019). Antitrust and Tech: Europe and the United States Differ, and It Matters.
Wong, J., & Henderson, T. (2019). The right to data portability in practice: Exploring the implications of the technologically neutral GDPR. Int Data Priv Law, 9(3), 173–191.