Data-Based Interpretable Modeling for Property Forecasting and Sensitivity Analysis of Li-ion Battery Electrode

Kailong Liu1, Qiao Pan2, Kang Li3, Tao Chen4
1WMG, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
2Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
3School of Electronic and Electric Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
4School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractLithium-ion batteries have become one of the most promising technologies for speeding up clean automotive applications, where electrode plays a pivotal role in determining battery performance. Due to the strongly-coupled and highly complex processes to produce battery electrode, it is imperative to develop an effective solution that can predict the properties of battery electrode and perform reliable sensitivity analysis on the key features and parameters during the production process. This paper proposes a novel tree boosting model-based framework to analyze and predict how the battery electrode properties vary with respect to parameters during the early production stage. Three data-based interpretable models including AdaBoost, LPBoost, and TotalBoost are presented and compared. Four key parameters including three slurry feature variables and one coating process parameter are analyzed to quantify their effects on both mass loading and porosity of battery electrode. The results demonstrate that the proposed tree model-based framework is capable of providing efficient quantitative analysis on the importance and correlation of the related parameters and producing satisfying early-stage prediction of battery electrode properties. These can benefit a deep understanding of battery electrodes and facilitate to optimizing battery electrode design for automotive applications.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Hu, J., Wei, Z., He, H.: An online adaptive internal short circuit detection method of lithium-ion battery. Automot. Innov. 4(1), 93–102 (2021)

Kwade, A., Haselrieder, W., Leithoff, R., Modlinger, A., Dietrich, F., Droeder, K.: Current status and challenges for automotive battery production technologies. Nat. Energy 3(4), 290–300 (2018)

Liu, Y., Zhang, R., Wang, J., Wang, Y.: Current and future lithium-ion battery manufacturing. Science. 2, 102332 (2021)

Lombardo, T., Duquesnoy, M., El-Bouysidy, H., et al.: Artificial intelligence applied to battery research: hype or Reality? Chem. Rev. 6, 9381 (2021)

Finegan, D.P., Cooper, S.J.: Battery safety: data-driven prediction of failure. Joule 3(11), 2599–2601 (2019)

Li, Y., Liu, K., Foley, A.M., Zülke, A., Berecibar, M., Maury, E.N., Mierlo, J.V., Hoster, H.E.: Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 113, 109254 (2019)

Che, Y., Foley, A., El-Gindy, M., Lin, X., Hu, X., Pecht, M.: Joint estimation of inconsistency and state of health for series battery packs. Automot. Innov. 4(1), 103–116 (2021)

Li, G., Liu, C., Wang, E., Wang, L.: State of charge estimation for Lithium-Ion battery based on improved cubature Kalman filter algorithm. Automot. Innovat. 3, 1–12 (2021)

Liu, K., Shang, Y., Ouyang, Q., Widanage, W.D.: A data-driven approach with uncertainty quantification for predicting future capacities and remaining useful life of lithium-ion battery. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 68(4), 3170–3180 (2020)

Tang, X., Liu, K., Wang, X., Gao, F., Macro, J., Widanage, W.D.: Model migration neural network for predicting battery aging trajectories. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 6(2), 363–374 (2020)

Hu, X., Zhang, K., Liu, K., Lin, X., Dey, S., Onori, S.: Advanced fault diagnosis for Lithium-Ion battery systems: a review of fault mechanisms, fault features, and diagnosis procedures. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 14(3), 65–91 (2020)

Ouyang, Q., Wang, Z., Liu, K., Xu, G., Li, Y.: Optimal charging control for lithium-ion battery packs: a distributed average tracking approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 16(5), 3430–3438 (2019)

Liu, K., Zou, C., Li, K., Wik, T.: Charging pattern optimization for lithium-ion batteries with an electrothermal-aging model. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14(12), 5463–5474 (2018)

Liu, K., Li, K., Zhang, C.: Constrained generalized predictive control of battery charging process based on a coupled thermoelectric model. J. Power Sources 347, 145–158 (2017)

Wang, G., Gao, Q., Yan, Y., Wang, Y.: Thermal management optimization of a Lithium-Ion battery module with graphite sheet fins and liquid cold plates. Automot. Innov. 3(4), 336–346 (2020)

Liu, K., Hu, X., Yang, Z., Xie, Y., Feng, S.: Lithium-ion battery charging management considering economic costs of electrical energy loss and battery degradation. Energy Convers. Manag. 195, 167–179 (2019)

Hu, X., Feng, F., Liu, K., Zhang, L., Xie, J., Liu, B.: State estimation for advanced battery management: key challenges and future trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 114, 109334 (2019)

Duquesnoy, M., Boyano, I., Ganborena, L., Cereijo, P., Ayerbe, E., Franco, A.: Machine learning-based on assessment of the impact of the manufacturing process on battery electrode heterogeneity. Energy AI 2, 100090 (2021)

Knoche, T., Surek, F., Reinhart, G.: A process model for the electrolyte filling of lithium-ion batteries. Procedia CIRP 41, 405–410 (2016)

Schünemann, J.H., Dreger, H., Bockholt, H., Kwade, A.: Smart electrode processing for battery cost reduction. ECS Trans. 73(1), 153–159 (2016)

Schnell, J., Nentwich, C., Endres, F., Kollenda, A., Distel, F., Knoche, T., Reinhart, G.: Data mining in lithium-ion battery cell production. J. Power Sources 413, 360–366 (2019)

Thiede, S., Turetskyy, A., Loellhoeffel, T., Kwade, A., Kara, S., Herrmann, C.: Machine learning approach for systematic analysis of energy efficiency potentials in manufacturing processes: a case of battery production. CIRP Ann. 69(1), 21–24 (2020)

Hoffmann, L., Grathwol, J.K., Haselrieder, W., et al.: Capacity distribution of large Lithium-Ion battery pouch cells in context with pilot production processes. Energ. Technol. 8(2), 1900196 (2020)

Kornas, T., Knak, E., Daub, R., Bührer, U., et al.: A multivariate KPI-based method for quality assurance in Lithium-ion battery production. Procedia CIRP 81, 75–80 (2019)

Liu, K., Hu, X., Meng, J., Guerrero, J.M., Teodorescu, R.: RUBoost-based ensemble machine learning for electrode quality classification in Li-ion battery manufacturing. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2, 1023 (2021)

Wenzel, V., Nirschl, H., Nötzel, D.: Challenges in Lithium-Ion battery slurry preparation and potential of modifying electrode structures by different mixing processes. Energ. Technol. 3(7), 692–698 (2015)

Liu, K., Wei, Z., Yang, Z., Li, K.: Mass load prediction for lithium-ion battery electrode clean production: a machine learning approach. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125159 (2021)

Cunha, R.P., Lombardo, T., Primo, E.N., Franco, A.A.: Artificial intelligence investigation of NMC cathode manufacturing parameters interdependencies. Batteries Supercaps 3(1), 60–67 (2020)

Zhou, Y., Mazzuchi, T.A., Sarkani, S.: M-AdaBoost-a based ensemble system for network intrusion detection. Expert Syst. Appl. 162, 113864 (2020)

Li, Y., Shi, H., Han, F., Duan, Z., Liu, H.: Smart wind speed forecasting approach using various boosting algorithms, big multi-step forecasting strategy. Renew. Energy 135, 540–553 (2019)

Warmuth, M.K., Liao, J., Rätsch, G.: Totally corrective boosting algorithms that maximize the margin. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pp. 1001–1008 (2006)

Chen, H., Lin, Z., Tan, C.: Random subspace-based ensemble modeling for near-infrared spectral diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Anal. Biochem. 567, 38–44 (2019)

Chen, J., Lian, Y., Li, Y.: Real-time grain impurity sensing for rice combine harvesters using image processing and decision-tree algorithm. Comput. Electron. Agric. 175, 105591 (2020)

Narkhede, S.: Understanding auc-roc curve. Towards Data Sci. 26, 220–227 (2018)

Zhang, Y., Lu, S., Zhou, X., et al.: Comparison of machine learning methods for stationary wavelet entropy-based multiple sclerosis detection: decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machine. Simulation 92(9), 861–871 (2016)