Damage criterion and safety assessment approach to tubular joints

Engineering Structures - Tập 22 - Trang 424-434 - 2000
B. Wang1, N. Hu1, Y. Kurobane2, Y. Makino2, S.T. Lie3
1Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860, Japan
3School of Civil and Structural Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang, Singapore 639798

Tài liệu tham khảo

Wang, 1995, Stress analyses and safety assessment of welded T-joints, Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering Kumamoto Univ., 40, 289 Makino Y, Kurobane Y, Wilmshurst SR, Lee MMK. Proposed ultimate capacity equations for CHS KK-joints under anti-symmetric loads. Proceedings of the 5th ISOPE conference, The Hague (The Netherlands), 1995:IV; 6–11. Lemaitre, 1985, A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture, J Engng Mater Technol, 107, 83, 10.1115/1.3225775 Lemaitre, 1990, Micro-mechanics of crack initiation, Int J Fract, 42, 87, 10.1007/BF00018615 Chow, 1988, A finite element analysis of continuum damage mechanics for ductile fracture, Int J Fracture, 38, 83, 10.1007/BF00033000 Gurson, 1977, Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth, J Engng Mater Technol, 4, 2, 10.1115/1.3443401 Jubran, 1991, Ultimate strength analysis of structural components using the continuum damage mechanics approach, Comput Struct, 39, 741, 10.1016/0045-7949(91)90218-B Cofer, 1992, A finite element technique for the ultimate strength analysis of tubular joints, Engng Computat, 9, 345, 10.1108/eb023871 ABAQUS, ABAQUS v5.5 Manuals (Users' Manual I and II, Theory Manual, Example Manuals I and II, Verification Manual). Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorenson Inc., 1995. Garwood. Crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) methods for fracture mechanics assessment. Proposal Revision to PD6493, ACFM, 1987. Kanninen MF, Popelar CH. Advanced fracture mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. Harrison RP, Loosemore K, Milne I. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. CEGB R/H/6, Central Electricity Generating Board, UK, 1976. Kumar V, German MD, Shih CF. An engineering approach for elastic–plastic fracture analysis, NP-1931, EPRI, 1981. Milne I. Failure assessment diagrams and J-estimates: A comparison for ferritic and austenitic steels. Int J Pressure Vessels and Piping 1983;13. Bloom JM, Malik SN. A procedure for the assessment of the integrity of nuclear pressure vessels and piping containing defects. EPRI Topical Report NP-2431, Research Project 1237-2, Palo Alto (CA), June, 1982. Cheaitani, 1994, Ultimate strength of cracked and uncracked tubular K-joints, Welding in the World, 33, 322 Kam, 1995, The prediction of crack shape development for in-service cracks in offshore welded tubular joints, Marine Structures, 8, 37, 10.1016/0951-8339(95)90664-G Kristian, 1993, Defect assessment of tubular T-joints using the R6 failure analysis diagram, J Pressure Vessel Technol, 115, 373, 10.1115/1.2929544 Yonemura H, Makino Y, Kurobane Y, van der Vegte GJ. Tests on CHS planar KK-joints under anti-symmetrical loads. In: Farkas J, Jarmai K, editors. Tubular Structures VII. 1996:181–95. Makino Y, Kurobane Y, Ochi K, van de Vegte GJ, Wilmshurst SR. Database of test and numerical analysis results for unstiffened tubular joints. IIW Doc. XV-E-96-220, Hungary, 1996. Ochi K, Kurobane Y, Makino Y. Further tests on CHS K-joints with various d/D ratios. Technical Report of Kumamoto University, Japan, 1981. American Welding Society, Structural Welding Code, AWS D1.1-94, 1994. Department of Energy, Background to new static strength guidance for tubular joints in steel offshore structures. Offshore Technology Report OTH89 308. London: HMSO, 1990. Kurobane, 1984, Ultimate resistance of unstiffened tubular joints, J Struct Engng, ASCE, 110, 385, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:2(385)