DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures

Buckleton, 2005, A framework for interpreting evidence, 27

Balding, 2005

DNA Advisory Board, Evaluation of the frequency of occurrence of DNA profiles calculated from pertinent population databases, Forensic Sci. Commun. 2 (2000), http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july2000/dnastat.htm.

Ladd, 2001, Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures, Croat. Med. J., 43, 244

Gill, 1998, Interpretation of simple mixtures when artefacts such as a stutters are present—with special reference to multiplex STRs used by the Forensic Science Service, Forensic Sci. Int., 95, 213, 10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00094-2

Gill, 2000, An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100pg of DNA, Forensic Sci. Int., 112, 17, 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00158-4

Buckleton, 2005, Is the 2p rule always conservative?, Forensic Sci. Int., 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.04.029

National Research Council, The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996, p. 130.

Clayton, 2005, Mixtures, 217

B.S. Weir, Court experiences in the USA: people v. Simpson, in: First International Conference on Forensic Human Identification in the Millenium, London, 1999.

C.H. Brenner, What's Wrong With the “Exclusion Probability?”, 1997, http://www.dna-view.com/exclusn.htm.

Weir, 1995, DNA statistics in the Simpson matter, Nat. Genet., 11, 365, 10.1038/ng1295-365

Evett, 1991, A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases, J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 31, 41, 10.1016/S0015-7368(91)73116-2

Weir, 1997, Interpreting DNA mixtures, J. Forensic Sci., 42, 213, 10.1520/JFS14100J

Gill, 1997, Development of guidelines to designate alleles using an STR multiplex system, Forensic Sci. Int., 89, 185, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00131-X

Gill, 1998, Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas, Forensic Sci. Int., 91, 41, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00174-6

Clayton, 1998, Analysis and intepretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling, Forensic Sci. Int., 91, 55, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00175-8

Perlin, 2001, Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples, J. Forensic Sci., 46, 1372, 10.1520/JFS15158J

Gill, 2005, A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 632, 10.1093/nar/gki205

Bill, 2004, PENDULUM—a guideline based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures, Forensic Sci. Int., 148, 181, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.037

Evett, 2000, More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions, Sci. Justice, 40, 3, 10.1016/S1355-0306(00)71926-5

Fregeau, 2003, AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL), J. Forensic Sci., 48, 1014, 10.1520/JFS2002188

Whitaker, 2001, A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis, Forensic Sci. Int., 123, 215, 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00557-6

Gill, 2001, Application of low copy number DNA profiling, Croat. Med. J., 42, 229

T. Howitt, Ensuring the Integrity of Results: A Continuing Challenge in Forensic DNA Analysis, 2003, http://www.promega.com/geneticidproc/ussymp14proc/oralpresentations/Howitt.pdf.

Gill, 2004, Development of a simulation model to assess the impact of contamination in casework using STRs, J. Forensic Sci., 49, 485, 10.1520/JFS2003366

Curran, 2005, Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure, Forensic Sci. Int., 148, 47, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.077