Cyber security meets artificial intelligence: a survey

Zhejiang University Press - Tập 19 Số 12 - Trang 1462-1474 - 2018
Jianhua Li1
1School of Cyber Security, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abeshu A, Chilamkurti N, 2018. Deep learning: the frontier for distributed attack detection in fog–to–things computing. IEEE Commun Mag, 56(2):169–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700332

Akhtar N, Mian A, 2018. Threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision: a survey. IEEE Access, 6:14410–14430. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2807385

Akhtar N, Liu J, Mian A, 2018. Defense against universal adversarial perturbations. IEEE/CVF Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p.3389–3398. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00357

Arulkumaran K, Deisenroth MP, Brundage M, et al., 2017. Deep reinforcement learning: a brief survey. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 34(6):26–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2743240

Aygün RC, Yavuz AG, 2017. A stochastic data discrimination based autoencoder approach for network anomaly detection. Proc 5th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conf, p.1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2017.7960410

Bonawitz K, Ivanov V, Kreuter B, et al., 2017. Practical secure aggregation for privacy–preserving machine learning. Proc ACM SIGSAC Conf on Computer and Communications Security, p.1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982

Bost R, Popa RA, Tu S, et al., 2015. Machine learning classification over encrypted data. Network and Distributed System Security Symp, p.331–364. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2015.23241

Chowdhury MMU, Hammond F, Konowicz G, et al., 2017. A few–shot deep learning approach for improved intrusion detection. Proc 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conf, p.456–462. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON.2017.8249084

Cisse M, Adi Y, Neverova N, et al., 2017. Houdini: fooling deep structured prediction models. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1707.05373

Cubuk ED, Zoph B, Schoenholz SS, et al., 2017. Intriguing properties of adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1711.02846

Dada EG, 2017. A hybridized SVM–kNN–pdAPSO approach to intrusion detection system. Faculty Seminar Series, p.1–8.

Deng L, Yu D, 2014. Deep learning: methods and applications. Found Trend Sig Process, 7(3–4): 197–387. https://doi.org/10.1561/2000000039

Feinman R, Curtin RR, Shintre S, et al., 2017. Detecting adversarial samples from artifacts. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1703.00410

Gao W, Morris T, Reaves B, et al., 2010. On SCADA control system command and response injection and intrusion detection. eCrime Researchers Summit, p.1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ecrime.2010.5706699

Gebhart T, Schrater P, 2017. Adversary detection in neural networks via persistent homology. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1711.10056

Golovko VA, 2017. Deep learning: an overview and main paradigms. Opt Memory Neur Netw, 26(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X16040081

Goodfellow IJ, Pouget–Abadie J, Mirza M, et al., 2014. Generative adversarial networks. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661

Goodfellow IJ, Shlens J, Szegedy C, 2015. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

Gu SX, Rigazio L, 2015. Towards deep neural network architectures robust to adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1412.5068

Guan ZT, Li J, Wu LF, et al., 2017. Achieving efficient and secure data acquisition for cloud–supported Internet of Things in smart grid. IEEE Internet Things J, 4(6): 1934–1944. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2690522

Hatcher WG, Yu W, 2018. A survey of deep learning: platforms, applications and emerging research trends. IEEE Access, 6:24411–24432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2830661

He W, Wei J, Chen XY, et al., 2017. Adversarial example defenses: ensembles of weak defenses are not strong. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1706.04701

Kokila RT, Selvi ST, Govindarajan K, 2014. DDoS detection and analysis in SDN–based environment using support vector machine classifier. Proc 6th Int Conf on Advanced Computing, p.205–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoAC.2014.7229711

Korczak J, Hernes M, 2017. Deep learning for financial time series forecasting in a–trader system. Proc Federated Conf on Computer Science and Information Systems, p.905–912. https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F449

Krotov D, Hopfield J, 2018. Dense associative memory is robust to adversarial inputs. Neur Comput, 30(12): 3151–3167. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01143

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G, 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature14539

Lee H, Han S, Lee J, 2017. Generative adversarial trainer: defense to adversarial perturbations with GAN. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1705.03387

Li GL, Wu J, Li JH, et al., 2018. Service popularity–based smart resources partitioning for fog computing–enabled industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 14(10):4702–4711. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2845844

Li LZ, Ota K, Dong MX, 2018a. Deep learning for smart industry: efficient manufacture inspection system with fog computing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 14(10):4665–4673. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2842821

Li LZ, Ota K, Dong MX, 2018b. DeepNFV: a light–weight framework for intelligent edge network functions virtualization. IEEE Netw, in press. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2018.1700394

Liang B, Li HC, Su MQ, et al., 2017. Detecting adversarial image examples in deep networks with adaptive noise reduction. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1705.08378

Loukas G, Vuong T, Heartfield R, et al, 2018. Cloud–based cyber–physical intrusion detection for vehicles using deep learning. IEEE Access, 6:3491–3508. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2782159

Luo Y, Boix X, Roig G, et al., 2015. Foveation–based mechanisms alleviate adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1511.06292

Lyu C, Huang KZ, Liang HN, 2015. A unified gradient regularization family for adversarial examples. IEEE Int Conf on Data Mining, p.301–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2015.84

Manning CD, Surdeanu M, Bauer J, et al., 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Proc 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, p.55–60. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-501 .

McMahan HB, Moore E, Ramage D, et al., 2016. Communication–efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1602.05629

Meng DY, Chen H, 2017. MagNet: a two–pronged defense against adversarial examples. Proc ACM Conf on Computer and Communications Security, p.135–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134057

Meng WZ, Li WJ, Kwok LF, 2015. Design of intelligent KNNbased alarm filter using knowledge–based alert verification in intrusion detection. Secur Commun Netw, 8(18): 3883–3895. https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.1307

Meng X, Shan Z, Liu FD, et al., 2017. MCSMGS: malware classification model based on deep learning. Int Conf on Cyber–Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, p.272–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberC.2017.21

Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al., 2015. Human–level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236

Moon D, Im H, Kim I, et al., 2017. DTB–IDS: an intrusion detection system based on decision tree using behavior analysis for preventing APT attacks. J Supercomput, 73(7):2881–2895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1604-8

Moosavi–Dezfooli SM, Fawzi A, Frossard P, 2016. DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks. IEEE Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p.2574–2582. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.282

Moosavi–Dezfooli SM, Fawzi A, Fawzi O, et al., 2017. Universal adversarial perturbations. Proc IEEE Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p.86–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.17

Mopuri KR, Garg U, Babu RV, 2017. Fast feature fool: a data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbations. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1707.05572

Nayebi A, Ganguli S, 2017. Biologically inspired protection of deep networks from adversarial attacks. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1703.09202

Olalere M, Abdullah MT, Mahmod R, et al., 2016. Identification and evaluation of discriminative lexical features of malware URL for real–time classification. Int Conf on Computer and Communication Engineering, p.90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2016.31

Ota K, Dao MS, Mezaris V, et al., 2017. Deep learning for mobile multimedia: a survey. ACM Trans Multim Comput Commun Appl, 13(3S), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3092831

Papernot N, McDaniel P, Jha S, et al., 2016. The limitations of deep learning in adversarial settings. IEEE European Symp on Security and Privacy, p.372–387. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2016.36

Phong LT, Aono Y, Hayashi T, et al., 2018. Privacypreserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption. IEEE Trans Inform Forens Secur, 13(5): 1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2787987

Ren SQ, He KM, Girshick R, et al., 2017. Faster R–CNN: towards real–time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 39(6): 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031

Ross AS, Doshi–Velez F, 2017. Improving the adversarial robustness and interpretability of deep neural networks by regularizing their input gradients. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1711.09404

Sabour S, Cao YS, Faghri F, et al., 2015. Adversarial manipulation of deep representations. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1511.05122

Shahid N, Aleem SA, Naqvi IH, et al., 2012. Support vector machine based fault detection & classification in smart grids. IEEE Globecom Workshops, p.1526–1531. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2012.6477812

Shokri R, Shmatikov V, 2015. Privacy–preserving deep learning. Proc 53rd Annual Allerton Conf on Communication, Control, and Computing, p.1310–1321. https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447103

Syarif AR, Gata W, 2017. Intrusion detection system using hybrid binary PSO and K–nearest neighborhood algorithm. 11th Int Conf on Information & Communication Technology and System, p.181–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS.2017.8265667

Vinayakumar R, Soman KP, Poornachandran P, et al., 2018. Detecting Android malware using long short–term memory (LSTM). J Int Fuzzy Syst, 34(3):1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-16942 .

Vollmer T, Manic M, 2009. Computationally efficient neural network intrusion security awareness. Proc 2nd Int Symp on Resilient Control Systems, p.25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRCS.2009.5251357

Vuong TP, Loukas G, Gan D, et al., 2015. Decision tree–based detection of denial of service and command injection attacks on robotic vehicles. IEEE Int Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2015.7368559

Wu J, Dong MX, Ota K, et al., 2018. Big data analysis–based secure cluster management for optimized control plane in software–defined networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag, 15(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2018.2799000

Xie CH, Wang JY, Zhang ZS, et al., 2017. Adversarial examples for semantic segmentation and object detection. IEEE Int Conf on Computer Vision, p.1378–1387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.153

Xin Y, Kong LS, Liu Z, et al., 2018. Machine learning and deep learning methods for cybersecurity. IEEE Access, 6:35365–35381. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2836950

Xu WL, Evans D, Qi YJ, 2017. Feature squeezing mitigates and detects Carlini/Wagner adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1705.10686

Yuan XY, 2017. PhD forum: deep learning–based real–time malware detection with multi–stage analysis. IEEE Int Conf on Smart Computing, p.1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2017.7946997

Zhao GZ, Zhang CX, Zheng LJ, 2017. Intrusion detection using deep belief network and probabilistic neural network. IEEE Int Conf on Computational Science and Engineering and IEEE Int Conf on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, p.639–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE-EUC.2017.119

Zhu DL, Jin H, Yang Y, et al., 2017. DeepFlow: deep learning–based malware detection by mining Android application for abnormal usage of sensitive data. IEEE Symp on Computers and Communications, p.438–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2017.8024568

Zolotukhin M, Hämäläinen T, Kokkonen T, et al., 2016. Increasing web service availability by detecting application–layer DDoS attacks in encrypted traffic. Proc 23rd Int Conf on Telecommunications, p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT.2016.7500408