Crossing the Line – “Science” and “Decisions” Facing Emerging Technologies

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 Số 3 - Trang 255-260 - 2015
Christian Büscher1, Jutta Jahnel1
1Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technnology, Karlstrasse 11, DE-76133, Karlsruhe, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

NRC (2009) Science and decisions advancing risk assessment. National Academies Press, Washington

Ribeiro PF, Polinder H, Verkerk MJ (2012) Planning and designing smart grids: philosophical considerations. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 31:34–43. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2012.2211771

Weinberg AM (1985) Science and its limits - the regulators dilemma. Issues Sci Technol 2:59–72

Dupuy J-P (2007) Rational choice before the apocalypse. Anthropoetics 13:1–18

Foerster H von (1994) Ethics and Second-order Cybernetics. SEHR 4(2). URL: http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/4-2/text/foerster.html

SCHER, SCENIHR, SCCS (2013) Making Risk Assessment More Relevant for Risk Management. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety; Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks; Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks; European Commission, Brussels

Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244

Miller G, Wickson F (2015) Risk analysis of nanomaterials: exposing Nanotechnology’s naked emperor. Rev Policy Res 32:485–512. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12129

Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 26:151–161. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782437

Renn O, Webler T, Johnson BB (1991) Public participation in hazard management: the Use of citizen panels in the U.S. RISK: Issues in Health and Safety 2:197–226

Collingridge D, Reeve C (1986) Science speaks to power the role of experts in policy making. St Martin’s Press, New York

Mol A (2008) The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, London, New York