Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon

Douglas C. Morton1, Ruth S. DeFries2,3,4, Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro5, Liana O. Anderson5,6, Egídio Arai5, Fernando Del Bon Espírito-Santo7, Ramon Morais de Freitas5, J. T. Morisette4
1Department of Geography, 2181 LeFrak Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
2*Department of Geography, 2181 LeFrak Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
3Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, 2207 Computer and Space Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742;
4Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Mail Code 614.5, Greenbelt, MD 20771
5Divisão de Sensoriamento Remoto, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), Av. dos Astronautas, 1758 Jardim da Granja, São José dos Campos, SP 12227-010, Brazil;
6Oxford University Centre for the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
7Complex Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Morse Hall, Durham, NH 03824; and

Tóm tắt

Intensive mechanized agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon grew by >3.6 million hectares (ha) during 2001–2004. Whether this cropland expansion resulted from intensified use of land previously cleared for cattle ranching or new deforestation has not been quantified and has major implications for future deforestation dynamics, carbon fluxes, forest fragmentation, and other ecosystem services. We combine deforestation maps, field surveys, and satellite-based information on vegetation phenology to characterize the fate of large (>25-ha) clearings as cropland, cattle pasture, or regrowing forest in the years after initial clearing in Mato Grosso, the Brazilian state with the highest deforestation rate and soybean production since 2001. Statewide, direct conversion of forest to cropland totaled >540,000 ha during 2001–2004, peaking at 23% of 2003 annual deforestation. Cropland deforestation averaged twice the size of clearings for pasture (mean sizes, 333 and 143 ha, respectively), and conversion occurred rapidly; >90% of clearings for cropland were planted in the first year after deforestation. Area deforested for cropland and mean annual soybean price in the year of forest clearing were directly correlated (R2= 0.72), suggesting that deforestation rates could return to higher levels seen in 2003–2004 with a rebound of crop prices in international markets. Pasture remains the dominant land use after forest clearing in Mato Grosso, but the growing importance of larger and faster conversion of forest to cropland defines a new paradigm of forest loss in Amazonia and refutes the claim that agricultural intensification does not lead to new deforestation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005: Progress Towards Sustainable Forest Managment (Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2006).

L Giglio, I Csiszar, CO Justice J Geophys Res 111, G02016. (2006).

10.1038/35002062

EF Lambin, HJ Geist Environment 45, 22–36 (2003).

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00697.x

10.1017/S0376892901000030

10.1579/0044-7447-34.6.462

10.1126/science.1117856

DC Nepstad, CM Stickler, OT Almeida Conserv Biol, in press. (2006).

Criação de Empregos Pelo Complexo Agroindustrial da Soja (Ministry of Agriculture, Brasilia, Brazil, 2004).

10.1038/434561a

Brazil’s Initial National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Ministry of Science and Technology, Brasilia, Brazil, 2004).

10.1007/s10584-005-8074-6

10.1073/pnas.182560099

10.1126/science.260.5116.1905

10.1126/science.1070656

10.1038/19066

10.1038/nature01437

10.1126/science.1118051

RA Houghton, KT Lawrence, JL Hackler, S Brown Glob Change Biol 7, 731–746 (2001).

10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00765.x

10.2307/1312340

10.1006/jeem.1998.1056

10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00511-4

10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/j.rse.2002.09.001

10.1111/1467-8276.00504

S Margulis World Bank Working Paper No. 22: Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2004).

10.1109/36.701075

10.1080/01431160010006926

10.1109/LGRS.2005.850364

10.1175/EI139.1

DC Morton, RS DeFries, YE Shimabukuro Cerrado Land Use and Conservation: Assessing Trade-Offs Between Human and Ecological Needs, eds C Klink, RS DeFries, R Cavalcanti (Conservation International, Washington, DC, in press. (2006).

D Kaimowitz, B Mertens, S Wunder, P Pacheco Hamburger Connection Fuels Amazon Destruction: Cattle Ranching and Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon (Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2004).

10.1126/science.1106049

10.1079/9780851994512.0195

10.1094/PD-89-0675

10.1175/EI143.1

World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030 (Earthscan Publications, London, UK, 2003).

10.1029/93JD01140

10.1029/98JD00172

10.1038/nature04389

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00351.x

DA Roberts, I Numata, K Holmes, G Batista, T Krug, A Monteiro, B Powell, OA Chadwick J Geophys Res 107, 40, 41–48 (2002).

CC Mueller Série Textos Para Discussão, Working Paper, eds M Bugarin, CC Mueller (University of Brasilia, Department of Economics, Brasilia, Brazil, no 306. (2003).

ASP Brandão, GC de Rezende, RW Marques Texto Para Discussão (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, no 1103. (2005).

10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2

10.1080/014311600209814

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.11.011