Critical interpretation of Cochran's Q test depends on power and prior assumptions about heterogeneity

Research Synthesis Methods - Tập 1 Số 2 - Trang 149-161 - 2010
Tiago Pereira1,2,3, Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos1,4, Georgia Salanti1, John P. A. Ioannidis5,1,6,7,8
1Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, 45110, Greece.
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
3Heart Institute (InCor), Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
4Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 2115, USA
5Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas, Ioannina 45110, Greece
6Professor and Chairman
7Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
8Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute and Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Modeling, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Higgins, 2002, Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 51, 10.1258/1355819021927674

Ioannidis, 2009, Publication Bias In meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, 38, 1740

Higgins, 2008, Commentary: heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified, International Journal of Epidemiology, 37, 1158, 10.1093/ije/dyn204

Ioannidis, 2008, Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14, 951, 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x

Ioannidis, 2008, Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots, BMJ, 336, 1413, 10.1136/bmj.a117

Ioannidis, 2007, Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses, BMJ, 335, 914, 10.1136/bmj.39343.408449.80

Rucker, 2008, Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 79, 10.1186/1471-2288-8-79

Reis, 1999, Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 × 2 tables, Statistics in Medicine, 18, 893, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990430)18:8<893::AID-SIM84>3.0.CO;2-5

Higgins, 2002, Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539, 10.1002/sim.1186

Patsopoulos, 2008, Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation, International Journal of Epidemiology, 37, 1148, 10.1093/ije/dyn065

Higgins, 2003, Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, BMJ, 327, 557, 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Patsopoulos, 2009, Heterogeneous views on heterogeneity, International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 1740, 10.1093/ije/dyn235

Cochran, 1954, The combination of estimates from different experiments, Biometrics, 10, 110, 10.2307/3001666

Huedo-Medina, 2006, Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?, Psychological Methods, 11, 193, 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193

Jackson, 2006, The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 25, 2688, 10.1002/sim.2481

The Cochrane Library Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2005

DerSimonian, 1986, Meta-analysis in clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177, 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

ls-Nielsen, 2004, Dopaminergic agonists for hepatic encephalopathy, Cochrane Database System Review, CD003047, 10.1002/14651858.CD003047.pub2

Viechtbauer, 2007, Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 26, 37, 10.1002/sim.2514

Mulrow, 2000, Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly, Cochrane Database System Review, CD000028

Wardlaw, 2000, Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke, Cochrane Database System Review, CD000213

Deeks, 2002, Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes, Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1575, 10.1002/sim.1188