Criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations

Emerald - 2011
MikaelFrödell1
1Construction Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

Tóm tắt

PurposeDespite numerous examples of benefits when adapting supplier relationship management in the manufacturing industry, the construction industry still lags behind in such areas as long‐term relationships with suppliers and continuous cost‐reductions. This may be because the characteristics of the construction industry differ from those of the manufacturing industry due to their project‐based structure, its inherent tendency for sub‐optimization and the vast number and variety of suppliers. The purpose of this study is to identify criteria for achieving efficient contractor‐supplier relations in the construction industry and for large contractors.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on the literature on efficiency and differentiation of efficient buyer‐supplier relationships as well as a two‐year case study based on participatory observations and interviews with strategic purchasers at a large Swedish contractor.FindingsAs it is not always possible to increase efficiency in the interface‐related value‐creating processes by only aiming the development and improvement efforts directly at these processes, relationship enablers such as total cost focus, aligned core values as well as willingness and capability for collaboration and development must first be in place. In order to achieve this, the contractor has to adopt a long‐term orientation towards the relationship with the suppliers, which is a decision for the management to make.Practical implicationsDrawing from the findings, this paper elucidates the connection between increased efficiency and input variables in the contractor‐supplier relationship, which might be difficult for contractors to see. Furthermore, contractors need to take responsibility over their own processes in order to be an attractive customer to the supplier.Originality/valueEven though research within construction has focused on relations between different actors, mostly client and contractor, this paper widens the perspective and takes a grasp of the relationship between contractor and supplier.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Akintoye, A. and Main, J. (2007), “Collaborative relationships in construction: the UK contractors' perception”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 597‐617.

Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007), Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Byggkommissionen (2002), Skärpning gubbar! Om konkurrensen, kvaliteten, kostnaderna och kompetensen i byggsektorn, Byggkommissionen, Stockholm, SOU 2002:115.

Carr, A.S. and Pearson, J.N. (1999), “Strategically managed buyer‐supplier relationships and performance outcomes”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 497‐519.

Dyer, J.H., Cho, D.S. and Chu, W. (1998), “Strategic supplier segmentation: ‘the next best practice’ in supply chain management”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 2, p. 57.

Ellegaard, C. and Ritter, T. (2006), “The concept of attraction – its purchasing potential”, Proceedings of 4th Annual Supply Chain Management Research Symposium, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Emberson, C. and Storey, J. (2006), “Buyer‐supplier collaborative relationships: beyond the normative accounts”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 236‐45.

Errasti, A., Beach, R., Oyarbide, A. and Santos, J. (2007), “A process for developing partnerships with subcontractors in the construction industry: an empirical study”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 250‐6.

Fernie, S. and Thorpe, A. (2007), “Exploring change in construction: supply chain management”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 319‐33.

Frödell, M. and Josephson, P.‐E. (2008), “Initiating supplier development through value stream analysis: the case of Skanska Sweden and its largest supplier”, CIB W65/55 Commissions: Transformation through Construction, UAE, Dubai.

Gidado, K.I. (1996), “Project complexity: the focal point of construction production planning”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 213‐25.

Gluch, P. and Räisänen, C. (2009), “Interactional perspective on environmental communication in construction projects”, Building Research & Information, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 164‐75.

Gold, R. (1958), “Roles in sociological field observations”, Social Forces, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 217‐23.

Harland, C. (1996), “International comparisons of supply‐chain relationships”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 35‐8.

Janda, S. and Seshadri, S. (2001), “The influence of purchasing strategies on performance”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 294‐308.

Kraljic, P. (1983), “Purchasing must become supply management”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 61 No. 5, pp. 109‐17.

Krause, D.R. (1999), “The antecedents of buying firms' efforts to improve suppliers”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 205‐24.

Lafley, A.G. (2009), “What only the CEO can do”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 87 No. 5, p. 54.

McAllister, D.J. (1995), “Affect‐ and cognition‐based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 24‐59.

Merriam, S. (2009), Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA.

Monczka, R.M., Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B. and Ragatz, G.L. (1998), “Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 29 No. 3, p. 553.

Pidduck, A.B. (2006), “Issues in supplier partner selection”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 262‐76.

Rozemeijer, F. (2008), “Purchasing myopia revisited again?”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 205‐7.

Ryu, S., Park, J.E. and Min, S. (2007), “Factors of determining long‐term orientation in interfirm relationships”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 60 No. 12, pp. 1225‐33.

Saad, M., Jones, M. and James, P. (2002), “A review of the progress towards the adoption of supply chain management (SCM) relationships in construction”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 173‐83.

Spekman, R.E., Kamauff, J.W. and Myhr, N. (1998), “An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 53‐67.

Statskontoret (2009), Sega gubbar? En uppföljning av Byggkommissionens betänkande, Skärpning gubbar, Statskontoret, Stockholm, p. 6.

Tangen, S. (2005), “Demystifying productivity and performance”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 34‐64.

van Echtelt, F. and Wynstra, F. (2001), “Managing supplier integration into product development: a literature review and conceptual model”, The Future of Innovation Studies, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.

van Weele, A. (2005), Purchasing & Supply Chain Management: Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice, Thomson, London.

Wynstra, F., Axelsson, B. and Weele, A.V. (2000), “Driving and enabling factors for purchasing involvement in product development”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 129‐41.

Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, London.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả