Crime displacement: what we know, what we don’t know, and what it means for crime reduction

Journal of Experimental Criminology - Tập 10 - Trang 549-571 - 2014
Shane D. Johnson1, Rob T. Guerette2, Kate Bowers1
1University College, London-Jill Dando Institute, London, UK
2Florida International University, Miami, USA

Tóm tắt

If offending were simply displaced following (often spatially) focused crime reduction initiatives, the continued expenditure of resources on this approach to crime reduction would be pointless. The aims of this article were to: critically appraise the current body of displacement research; identify gaps in understanding; articulate an agenda for future research; and to consider the implications of the accumulated findings for practitioners, evaluators, and policy makers. First, we review existing criminological theory regarding crime displacement and the alternative perspective—that crime prevention activity might generate a diffusion of crime control benefits. Second, we review the empirical research, focusing in particular on the findings of existing systematic reviews. Third, we consider the types of displacement that might occur and the methodological approaches employed to study them. Theoretical and empirical research suggests that displacement is far from inevitable and that a diffusion of crime control benefit is at least as likely. However, some forms of displacement have not been adequately studied. Existing research suggests that successful crime reduction interventions often have a positive impact on crime that extends beyond the direct recipients of a particular project. However, current understanding of crime displacement and how benefits might diffuse remains incomplete. Consequently, to inform an agenda for future research, we derive a typology of methodological issues associated with studying displacement, along with suggestions as to how they might be addressed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barr, R., & Pease, K. (1990). Crime Placement, Displacement and Deflection. In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, eds. Michael Tonry and N. Morris, Vol. 12. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baudains, P., Braithwaite, A., & Johnson, S. D. (2013). Target Choice During Extreme Events: A Discrete Spatial Choice Model of the 2011 London Riots. Criminology, 51(2), 251–285. Bennett, T., & Wright, T. (1984). Burglars on burglary: prevention and the offender. Aldershot, UK: Gower. Bernasco, W. (2010). A Sentimental Journey To Crime: Effects of Residential History on Crime Location Choice. Criminology, 48, 389–416. Bernasco, W., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas?: A New Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Location Choice. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 296–315. Bernasco, W., & Block, R. (2009). Where Offenders Choose to Attack: A Discrete Choice Model of Robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47, 93–130. Bowers, K., & Johnson, S. (2003). Measuring the Geographical Displacement and Diffusion of Benefit Effects of Crime Prevention Activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 193, 275–301. Bowers, K. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2008). Evaluating crime prevention: the potential of using individual-level matched control designs. Policing, 2(2), 218–225. Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S. D., & Hirschfield, A. F. G. (2003). Pushing Back the Boundaries: New Techniques for Assessing the Impact of Burglary Schemes. Home Office Online report 24/03. London: Home Office. Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S. D., & Hirschfield, A. F. (2004). Closing off opportunities for crime: an evaluation of alley-gating. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10(4), 285–308. Bowers, Kate, Shane Johnson, Rob T. Guerette, Lucia Summers, and Suzanne Poynton. (2010). “Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Benefit among Geographically Focused Policing Initiatives.” Report submitted to the Center for Evidence Based Crime Policy at George Mason University and the National Policing Improvement Agency (UK). Bowers, K., Johnson, S., Guerette, R. T., Summers, L., & Poynton, S. (2011). Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits among Geographically Focused Policing Initiatives: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 347–374. Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2012). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, (ahead-of-print), 1–31. Brand, S., & Price, R. (2000). The Economic and Social Costs of Crime. Home Office Research Study 217. London: Home Office. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (Eds.) Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: toward a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 5, 259–294. Clarke, Ronald. V. (1983) Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (Eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Clarke, R. V., & Eck, J. (2003).Become a problem solving crimeanalyst in 55 small steps. http://www.popcenter.org/library Clarke, R. V., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits: Observations on the Reverse of Displacement. In Crime Prevention Studies, ed. Ronald V. Clarke, Vol. 2. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American SociologicalReview, 44, 588–608. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding Crime Displacement: An Application of Rational Choice Theory. Criminology, 254, 933–947. Cornish, D. B. (1994). “The Procedural Analysis of Offending and its Relevance for Situational Prevention”. in Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 3, ed. R.V.. Clarke, Monsey: Criminal Justice Press. Eck, J. E. (1993). The Threat of Crime Displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 253, 527–546. Ekblom, P., & Pease, K. (1995). Evaluating crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 585–662. Farrell, G., Bowers, K., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Cost-benefit analysis for crime science: making cost-benefit analysis useful through a portfolio of outcomes. In M. J. Smith & N. Tilley (Eds.), Crime Science. Cullompton: Willan. Farrington, D. P., Gill, M., Waples, S. J., & Argomaniz, J. (2007). The effects ofclosed-circuit television on crime: meta-analysis of an English national quasiexperimentalmulti-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 21–38. Gabor, T. (1990). Crime Displacement and Situational Prevention: Toward the Development of Some Principles. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 41–73. Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. (2009). Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations. Criminology, 47(4). Guerette, Rob T. (2009). “Analyzing Crime Displacement and Diffusion.” Problem- Solving Tool Guides for Police Series, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Washington, D.C. Hesseling, R. (1994). Displacement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. In Crime Prevention Studies, ed. Ronald V. Clarke, Vol. 3. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press. Johnson, S. D. (2009). Potential uses of computational methods in the evaluation of crime reduction activity. In J. Knuttson & N. Tilley (Eds.), Evaluating crime prevention. New York: Criminal Justice Press. Johnson, S.D. (2014). How do offenders choose where to offend? Perspectives from animal for aging. Legal and Criminological Psychology, in press. Johnson, S.D., and Summers, L. (2014). Testing Ecological Theories of Offender Spatial Decision Making using a Discrete Choice Model. Crime & Delinquency, in press. Johnson, S. D., Bowers, K. J., Young, C. A., & Hirschfield, A. F. G. (2001). Uncovering the True Picture: Evaluating Crime Reduction Initiatives using Disaggregate Crime Data. Crime a Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 3(4), 7–24. Johnson, S. D., Summers, L., & Pease, K. (2009). Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 181–200. Johnson, S. D., Bowers, K. J., & Guerrette, R. (2012). Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Measures. In B. Welsh & D. Farrington (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kurland, J., Johnson, S. D., & Tilley, N. (2014). Offenses around stadiums: a natural experiment on crime attraction and generation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 5–28. Lammers, M. (2014). Are arrested and non-arrested serial offenders different? A test of spatial offending patterns using DNA found at crime scenes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(2), 143–167. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Manning, M., Smith, C., & Homel, R. (2013). Valuing developmental crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(2), 305–332. Marchant, P. (2005). What works? A critical note on the evaluation of crime reduction initiatives.Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 7, 7–13. Matthews, R. (1990). Developing more effective strategies for curbing prostitution. Security Journal, 1(3), 182–187. Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography, 38, 41. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences : a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell. Ratcliffe, Jerry H. (2002) Burglary reduction and the myth of displacement. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Paper 232, August 2002. Rengert, G. F. & Waslichick, J. (2000). Suburban burglary: a timeand a place foreverything. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas. Telep, Cody W., David Weisburd, Charlotte E. Gill, Zoe Vitter, Doron Teichman (2014). Displacement of Crime and Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits in Large-Scale Geographic Areas: A Systematic Review. Journal of Experimental Criminology (in press). Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L., Ready, J., Eck, J., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does Crime Just Move Around the Corner? A Controlled Study of Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits. Criminology, 443, 549–591. Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Measuring Immediate Spatial Displacement: Methodological Issues and Problems. In Crime and Place. Crime Prevention Studies, eds. John Eck and David Weisburd, Vol. 4. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press. Weisburd, D., and Telp, C. (2012). Spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits revisited: New evidence on why crime doesn’t just move around the corner. In N. Tilley and Farrell, G. (Eds.). The Reasoning Criminologist: Essays in honour of Ronald V Clarke. London: Routledge Weisburd D., Telep, C. Hinkle, J., & Eck, J. (2008). The efects ofproblem-orientedpolicing oncrime anddisorder. Oslo: Campbell Collaboration. Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. (1976). The Criminal Personality, Vol 1, A Profile for change. New York: Jason Aronson. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Oxford: Addison-Wesley.