Crews: A Distinct Type of Work Team

Journal of Business and Psychology - 2004
Sheila Simsarian Webber1, Richard J. Klimoski2
1School of Business, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME
2George Mason University, USA

Tóm tắt

Distinctions among different types of work teams have been emerging in the theoretical literature as a key to understanding important work team processes. This has been precipitated by an increased appreciation of the importance of a work team's operating environment on such processes. Moreover, such distinctions are felt to be useful to practice in such areas as team staffing, training, and establishing leadership requirements. The present study investigates the concept of “crews” and contrasts it with other types of work teams by empirically assessing “crewness,” the extent to which a work team can be classified as a crew. A new scale of “crewness” was developed and administered to various collectives of workers including fire fighter crew members and project team members in order to establish the unique qualities of crews to show that they are a distinct type of work team. Construct and discriminant validity evidence is offered in support of the crewness scale. Approaches for further investigation of this distinction are also provided in order to guide both research and practice in this area.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Argote, L., & McGrath, J.E. (1993). Group process in organizations: Continuity and change. In C. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 333-389). London: John Wiley.

Arrow, H., & McGrath, J.E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373-411). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Banks, D.J., & Kiechel, K.L. (1999). Not all teams are created equal: A meta-analysis of team building interventions. Paper presented at the 1999 Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology conference, Atlanta.

Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R.A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making (pp. 9-45). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.

Dyer, J.L. (1984). Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review. In F.A. Muckler (Ed.), Human Factors Review (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Guzzo, R.A., & Salas, E. (Eds.) (1995). Team Effectiveness and Decision Making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Hackman, J.R. (1976). Group influences on individuals. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1455-1525). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.

Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J.W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hinkin, T.R. (1995). Review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988.

Johns, G. (1991). Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 80-105.

Klimoski, R., & Jones, R.G. (1995). Staffing for effective group decision making. In R.A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making (pp. 9-45). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Klimoski, R., & Zukin, L. (2000). Selection and staffing for team effectiveness. In E. Sundstrom & Associates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance (pp. 63-91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., McHugh, P. P., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A (1996). A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 14, 253-305. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

MacCallum, R. (1998). Commentary on quantitative methods in I/O research. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 35, 18-30.

McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

McGrath, J.E., & Altman, I. (1966). Small Group Research: A Synthesis and Critique of the Field. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J., & Arrow, H. (1995). Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. In S.E. Jackson & M.N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in Work Teams (pp. 17-45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Morgan, B.B., Jr., Glickman, A.S., Woodard, E.A., Blaiwes, A.S., & Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of Team Behaviors in a Navy Environment (NTSC Tech. Rep. No. TR-86-014). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.

Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hi

Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., & Blickensderfer, E.L. (1993). Team performance and training research: Emerging principles. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 83, 81-106.

Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., & Tannenbaum, S.I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R.W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 3-30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Shaw, M.E. (1976). Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. McGraw-Hill.

Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.

Swezey, R.W., & Salas, E. (Eds.) (1992). Teams: Their Training and Performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Tannenbaum, S.E., Beard, R.L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Advances in Psychology: Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial/Organizational Psychology (Vol. 82) (pp. 117-153). New York: North-Holland.

Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1996). Promoting team effectiveness. In M.A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 503-530). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Weick, K.E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled system. Administrative Science Quarterly 21, 1-19.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Business and Psychology

Thông tin tác giả