Credibilistic value and average value at risk in fuzzy risk analysis
Tóm tắt
Decision making in real world is usually made in fuzzy environment and subject to fuzzy risks. The value at risk (VaR) is a widely used tool in risk management and the average value at risk (AVaR) is a risk measure which is a superior alternative to VaR. In this paper, we present a methodology for fuzzy risk analysis based on credibility theory. First, we present the new concepts of the credibilistic VaR and credibilistic AVaR. Next, we examine some properties of the proposed credibilistic VaR and credibilistic AVaR. After that, a kind of fuzzy simulation algorithms are given to show how to calculate them. Finally, a numerical example is illustrated. The proposed credibilistic VaR and credibilistic AVaR are suitable for use in many real problems of fuzzy risk analysis.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander S, Coleman T F, Li Y (2006) Minimizing CVaR and VaR for a portfolio of derivatives. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30, No. 2: 583–605
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J M, and Heath D (1997) Thinking coherently. Risk, Vol. 10, No. 11: 68–71
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, Vol. 9, No. 3: 203–228
Chen S J, Chen S M (2003) Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol.11, No.1: 45–56
Chen S J, Chen S M (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Applied Intelligence, Vol. 26, No. 1: 1–11
Chen S J, Chen S M (2008) Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 55, No. 8: 1670–1685
Cheng S, Liu Y, Wang S (2004) Progress in risk measurement. Advanced Modeling and Optimization, Vol. 6, No. 1: 1–20
Choudhry M (2006) An introduction to value-at-risk. 4th Edition, John Wiley.
Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 4, No.1: 7–49
Fermanian J D, Scaillet O (2005) Sensitivity analysis of VaR and expected shortfall for portfolios under netting agreements. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 29, No. 4: 927–958
Gotoh J Y, Takano Y (2007) Newsvendor solutions via conditional value-at-risk minimization. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 179, No. 1: 80–96
Gourieroux C, Laurent J P, Scaillet O (2000) Sensitivity analysis of values at risk. Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 7, No. 3: 225–245
Huang C, Moraga C (2002) A fuzzy risk model and its matrix algorithm. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4: 347–362
Jorion P (2001) Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York
Kaplanski G, Kroll Y (2002) VaR risk measures vs traditional risk measures: an analysis and survey. Journal of Risk, Vol. 4, No. 3: 1–28
Lee L W, Chen S M (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on fuzzy numbers with different shapes and different deviations. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 4: 2763–2771
Li X, and Liu B (2006) A sufficient and necessary condition for credibility measures. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-based Systems, Vol. 14, No. 5: 527–535
Liu B (2004) Uncertainty theory: An introduction to its axiomatic foundations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Liu B (2006) A survey of credibility theory. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 4: 387–408
Liu B (2007) A survey of entropy of fuzzy variables. Journal of Uncertain Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1: 4–13
Liu B, Liu Y K (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4: 445–450
Liu Y K, Gao J (2007) The independence of fuzzy variables in credibility theory and its applications. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-based Systems, Vol.15,Suppl. April: 1–19
Morgan J P (1996) Risk metrics TM-technical document. Fourth Edition, Morgan Guaranty Trust Companies, Inc. New York
Peng J, Liu B (2004) Some properties of optimistic and pessimistic values of fuzzy variables. Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 2: 292–295.
Peng J, Mok H M K, Tse W M (2005) Fuzzy dominance based on credibility distributions. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligent, Vol. 3613: 295–303
Peng J, Liu H, Shang G (2006) Ranking fuzzy variables in terms of credibility measure. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligent, Vol. 4223: 217–220
Peng J (2008) Measuring fuzzy risk with credibilistic value at risk. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control, Dalian, China, June 18–20, 718–721
Roberts SM(1999) Practical issues in the use of probabilistic risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 5, No. 4: 729–736
Rockafeller R T, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, Vol. 2, No. 3: 21–41
Rockafeller R T, and Uryasev S (2001) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 26, No. 7: 1443–1471
Rockafeller R T (2007) Coherent approaches to risk in optimization under uncertainty. Tutorials in Operations Research INFORMS, 38–61
Xu Z, Shang S, Qian W, Shu W (2010) A method for fuzzy risk analysis based on the new similarity of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 3: 1920–1927
Zadeh L A (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, Vol. 8: 338–353