Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Tư duy sáng tạo và ước lượng nhận thức trong bệnh Parkinson
Tóm tắt
Bệnh nhân mắc bệnh Parkinson (PD) đã được báo cáo về những đợt sáng tạo không bình thường (ví dụ: vẽ, viết), đặc biệt là trong bối cảnh điều trị bằng các tác nhân dopaminergic. Trong nghiên cứu này, chúng tôi đã điều tra tư duy phân kỳ và tư duy hội tụ, được cho là nền tảng của sự sáng tạo. Ngoài ra, chúng tôi cũng đánh giá ước lượng nhận thức. Hai mươi bệnh nhân PD và 20 người tham gia kiểm soát khỏe mạnh được thử nghiệm với nhiệm vụ Sử dụng Thay thế của Guilford (tư duy phân kỳ), nhiệm vụ Liên kết Từ xa (tư duy hội tụ) và hai bài kiểm tra ước lượng nhận thức. Không có sự khác biệt giữa các nhóm được phát hiện trong nhiệm vụ tư duy hội tụ, trong khi nhiệm vụ Sử dụng Thay thế của Guilford cho thấy số lượng phản hồi đúng giảm và tính độc đáo giảm ở bệnh nhân PD. Tính độc đáo ở bệnh nhân PD có liên quan đến tổng liều hàng ngày của thuốc dopaminergic. Hơn nữa, cả hai bài kiểm tra ước lượng nhận thức đều cho thấy sự suy giảm ở bệnh nhân PD. Chỉ có các tác động nhỏ được phát hiện đối với các chỉ số tâm lý học của các quy trình con của tư duy sáng tạo, trong khi ước lượng, phụ thuộc vào chức năng điều hành, lại bị suy giảm ở bệnh nhân PD. Chúng tôi đề xuất nên có cái nhìn hướng đến sản phẩm về sự sáng tạo trong các nghiên cứu tiếp theo về các quá trình sáng tạo bị thay đổi trong bệnh PD.
Từ khóa
#bệnh Parkinson #tư duy sáng tạo #ước lượng nhận thức #tác nhân dopaminergic #nghiên cứu khoa họcTài liệu tham khảo
Abt, K. (1987). Descriptive data analysis: A concept between confirmatory and exploratory data analysis. Methods of Information in Medicine, 26, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1635488
Appollonio, I. M., Russo, A., Isella, V., Forapani, E., Villa, M. L., Piolti, R., & Frattola, L. (2003). Cognitive [correction of cognitve] estimation: Comparison of two tests in nondemented parkinsonian patients. Neurology Science, 24, 153–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-003-0105-3
Aschenbrenner, S., Tucha, O., & Lange, K. W. (2000). Regensburger Wortflüssigkeits Test (RWT). Hogrefe.
Bäumler, G. (1985). Farbe-wort-interferenztest (FWIT). Hogrefe.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-second edition manual. The Psychological Corporation.
Billino, J., Brand, M., & Roesler, A. (2008). Cognitive estimation in patients with early subcortical vascular dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 223(9), 982–983.
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639.
Brand, M., Kalbe, E., & Kessler, J. (2002). Test zum kognitiven Schätzen: TKS; Manual. Beltz.
Bullard, S. E., Fein, D., Gleeson, M. K., Tischer, N., Mapou, R. L., & Kaplan, E. (2004). The Biber cognitive estimation test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(6), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2003.12.002
Canesi, M., Rusconi, M. L., Isaias, I. U., & Pezzoli, G. (2012). Artistic productivity and creative thinking in Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neurology, 19, 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03546.x
Canesi, M., Rusconi, M. L., Moroni, F., Ranghetti, A., Cereda, E., & Pezzoli, G. (2016). Creative thinking, professional artists, and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease, 6, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-150681
Chatterjee, A., Hamilton, R. H., & Amorapanth, P. X. (2006). Art produced by a patient with Parkinson’s disease. Behavioural Neurology, 17, 105–108.
Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458–465.
Cilibrasi, R. L., & Vitányi, P. M. B. (2007). The Google similarity distance. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19, 370–383.
Cipolotti, L., MacPherson, S. E., Gharooni, S., van Harskamp, N., Shallice, T., Chan, E., & Nachev, P. (2018). Cognitive estimation: Performance of patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions. Neuropsychologia, 115, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.017
Cools, R. (2008). Role of dopamine in the motivational and cognitive control of behavior. The Neuroscientist, 14, 381–395.
D’Aniello, G. E., Scarpina, F., Albani, G., Castelnuovo, G., & Mauro, A. (2015). Disentangling the relationship between cognitive estimation abilities and executive functions: A study on patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological Science, 36(8), 1425–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2158-5
Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L. H., Sacco, L., & Spinnler, H. (2004). The role of semantic memory on the cognitive estimation task: Evidence from Alzheimer’s Disease and healthy adult aging. Journal of Neurology, 251, 156–164.
Diedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J. M., Neubauer, A. C., & Benedek, M. (2018). Assessment of real-life creativity: The inventory of creative activities and achievements (ICAA). Psychol Aesthetics Creativity Arts, 12, 304–316.
Faouzi, J., Corvol, J. C., & Mariani, L. L. (2021). Impulse control disorders and related behaviors in Parkinson’s disease: Risk factors, clinical and genetic aspects, and management. Current Opinion in Neurology, 34(4), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000955
Faust-Socher, A., Kenett, Y. N., Cohen, O. S., Hassin-Baer, S., & Inzelberg, R. (2014). Enhanced creative thinking under dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson disease. Annals of Neurology, 75(6), 935–942.
Frank, M. J. (2005). Dynamic dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia: A neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in medicated and nonmedicated Parkinsonism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 51–72.
Garcia-Garcia, M., Barceló, F., Clemente, I. C., & Escera, C. (2010). The role of the dopamine transporter DAT1 genotype on the neural correlates of cognitive flexibility. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 754–760.
Garcia-Ruiz, P. J., Martinez Castrillo, J. C., & Desojo, L. V. (2019). Creativity related to dopaminergic treatment: A multicenter study. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 63, 169–173.
Goetz, C. G., Tilley, B. C., Shaftman, S. R., Stebbins, G. T., Fahn, S., Martinez-Martin, P., Poewe, W., Sampaio, C., Stern, M. B., Dodel, R., Dubois, B., Holloway, R., Jankovic, J., Kulisevsky, J., Lang, A. E., Lees, A., Leurgans, S., LeWitt, P. A., Nyenhuis, D., … Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. (2008). Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Movement Disorders, 23(15), 2129–2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22340
Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Are teachings’ ratings of students’ creativity related to students’ divergent thinking? A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 1–17.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17, 427–442.
Inzelberg, R. (2013). The awakening of artistic creativity and Parkinson’s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127, 256–261.
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28, 95–105.
Joutsa, J., Martikainen, K., & Kaasinen, V. (2012). Parallel appearance of compulsive behaviors and artistic creativity in Parkinson’s disease. Case Reports in Neurology, 4, 77–83.
Kalbe, E., Calabrese, P., Kohn, N., Hilker, R., Riedel, O., Wittchen, H. U., Dodel, R., Otto, J., Ebersbach, G., & Kessler, J. (2008). Screening for cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease with the Parkinson neuropsychometric dementia assessment (PANDA) instrument. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 14, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.06.008
Kraemmer, J., Smith, K., Weintraub, D., Guillemot, V., Nalls, M. A., Cormier-Dequaire, F., Moszer, I., Brice, A., Singleton, A. B., & Corvol, J. C. (2016). Clinical-genetic model predicts incident impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 87(10), 1106–1111. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312848
Kulisevsky, J., Pagonabarraga, J., & Martinez-Corral, M. (2009). Changes in artistic style and behaviour in Parkinson’s disease: Dopamine and creativity. Journal of Neurology, 256, 816–819.
Landmann, N., Kuhn, M., Piosczyk, H., Feige, B., Riemann, D., & Nissen, C. (2014). Entwicklung von 130 deutschsprachigen compound remote associate (CRA)-Worträtseln zur Untersuchung kreativer Prozesse im deutschen Sprachraum. Psychologische Rundschau, 65, 200–211.
Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Specker, E., Ishizu, T., Haugbøl, S., Hollunder, B., Leder, H., Stender, J., & Kupers, R. (2019). Parkinson’s disease and changes in the appreciation of art: a comparison of aesthetic and formal evaluations of paintings between PD patients and healthy controls. Brain and Cognition, 136, 103597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103597
Lhommée, E., Batir, A., Quesada, J. L., Ardouin, C., Fraix, V., Seigneuret, E., Chabardès, S., Benabid, A. L., Pollak, P., & Krack, P. (2014). Dopamine and the biology of creativity: Lessons from Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Neurology, 5, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00055
Lim, S. Y., Evans, A. H., & Miyasaki, J. M. (2008). Impulse control and related disorders in Parkinson’s disease: Review. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1142, 85–107.
De Manzano, Ö., Cervenka, S., Karabanov, A., Farde, L., & Ullén, F. (2010). Thinking outside a less intact box: Thalamic dopamine D2 receptor densities are negatively related to psychometric creativity in healthy individuals. PloSOne, 5, e10670.
Mayseless, N., Uzefovsky, F., Shalev, I., Ebstein, R. P., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2013). The association between creativity and 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 502.
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.
Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. (1971). Remote associates test: Examiner’s manual. Houghton Mifflin.
Mendez, M. F., Doss, R. C., & Cherrier, M. M. (1998). Use of the cognitive estimations test to discriminate frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Neurology, 11, 2–6.
Moneta, G. B., & Rogaten, J. (2016). Psychology of creativity: Cognitive, emotional, and social processes. Nova Science Publishers.
Murphy, M., Runco, M. A., Selcuk, A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Reanalysis of genetic data and rethinking relationship with creativity. Creative Research Journal, 25, 147–148.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119). New York.
Niemann, H., Köhler, S., Sturm, S., Willmes, K., Gottland, S., & Saß, C. (1999). Der California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT): Daten zu einer autorisierten deutschen Version. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 10, 220–221.
Nombela, C., Rittman, T., Robbins, T. W., & Rowe, J. B. (2014). Multiple modes of impulsivity in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE, 9, e85747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085747
Pastor, M. A., Artieda, J., Jahanshahi, M., & Obeso, J. A. (1992). Time estimation and reproduction is abnormal in Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 115, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.1.211
Perry, R. J., & Hodges, J. R. (1999). Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. Brain, 122, 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.3.383
Reuter, M., Roth, S., Holve, K., & Hennig, J. (2006). Identification of the first candidate genes for creativity: A pilot study. Brain Research, 1069, 190–197.
Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creative Research Journal, 23, 376–380.
Scarpina, F., Mauro, A., D’Aniello, G. E., Albani, G., Castelnuovo, G., Ambiel, E., & MacPherson, S. E. (2017). Cognitive estimation in non-demented Parkinson’s Disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx019
Schade, S., Mollenhauer, B., & Trenkwalder, C. (2020). Levodopa equivalent dose conversion factors: An updated proposal including opicapone and safinamide. Mov Disord Clin Pract., 7, 343–345.
Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). The MIT Press.
Schrag, A., & Trimble, M. (2001). Poetic talent unmasked by treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 16, 1175–1176.
Schwingenschuh, P., Katschnig, P., Saurugg, R., Ott, E., & Bhatia, K. P. (2010). Artistic profession: A potential risk factor for dopamine dysregulation syndrome in Parkinson’s disease? Movement disorders, 25, 493–496.
Seeman, P. (2015). Parkinson’s disease treatment may cause impulse-control disorder via dopamine D3 receptors. Synapse (New York, N. Y.), 69, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21805
Shallice, T., & Evans, M. E. (1978). The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex, 14, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80055-0
Smith, J. G., Harper, D. N., Gittings, D., & Abernethy, D. (2007). The effect of Parkinson’s disease on time estimation as a function of stimulus duration range and modality. Brain and Cognition, 64, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.01.005
Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity: Individual procedures (Vol. I). Academic Press.
Sturm, W., Willmes, K., & Horn, W. (1993). Leistungsprüfsystem für 50–90 jährige (LPS 50+). Hogrefe.
Walker, R. H., Warwick, R., & Cercy, S. P. (2006). Augmentation of artistic productivity in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 21, 285–286.
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). A new look at the creativity-intelligence distinction. Journal of Personality, 33, 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01391.x
Weintraub, D., Koester, J., Potenza, M. N., Siderowf, A. D., Stacy, M., Voon, V., Whetteckey, J., Wunderlich, G. R., & Lang, A. E. (2010). Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: A cross-sectional study of 3090 patients. Archives of Neurology, 67, 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.65
Weintraub, D., Posavi, M., Fontanillas, P., Tropea, T. F., Mamikonyan, E., Suh, E., Trojanowski, J. Q., Cannon, P., Van Deerlin, V. M., Chen-Plotkin, A. S., 23 and Me Research Team. (2022). Genetic prediction of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 9(7), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51569
Witt, K., Krack, P., & Deuschl, G. (2006). Change in artistic expression related to subthalamic stimulation. Journal of Neurology, 253, 955–956.
Zabelina, D. L., Colzato, L., Beeman, M., & Hommel, B. (2016). Dopamine and the creative mind: Individual differences in creativity are predicted by interactions between dopamine genes DAT and COMT. PLoS ONE, 11, e0146768.
Zabelina, D. L., Condon, D., & Beeman, M. (2014). Do dimensional psychopathology measures relate to creative achievement and divergent thinking? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11.
Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (2002). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP), Version 1.7. PsyTest.