Counting ‘uhm’s: How tracking the distribution of native and non-native disfluencies influences online language comprehension

Altmann, 2011, Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to, Acta Psychologica, 137, 190, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.009 Arnold, 2003, Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 25, 10.1023/A:1021980931292 Arnold, 2007, If you say -thee uh- you’re describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 914 Arnold, 2011, Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible, 197 Arnold, 2004, The old and thee, uh, new: Disfluency and reference resolution, Psychological Science, 15, 578, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x Baayen, 2008 Baayen, 2008, Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 Barr, 2010, The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency, Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 441, 10.1080/01690960903047122 Bates, 2015, Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 Bortfeld, 2001, Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender, Language and Speech, 44, 123, 10.1177/00238309010440020101 Bosker, 2013, What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs, Language Testing, 30, 157, 10.1177/0265532212455394 Bosker, 2014, Native ’um’s elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native ’um’s do not, Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 104, 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.004 Bosker, 2014, The perception of fluency in native and non-native speech, Language Learning, 64, 579, 10.1111/lang.12067 Bosker, H. R., & Reinisch, E. (2015). Normalization for speechrate in native and nonnative speech. In M. Wolters, J. Livingstone, Beattie B, R. Smith, M. MacMahon, J. Stuart-Smith, & J. Scobbie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th international congress of phonetic sciences 2015 [ICPhS XVIII], Glasgow. Brunellière, 2013, The speakers’ accent shapes the listeners’ phonological predictions during speech perception, Brain and Language, 125, 82, 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.007 Chang, 2006, Becoming syntactic, Psychological Review, 113, 234, 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234 Clark, 2012, Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences Corley, 2011, Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis, PloS One, 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0019792 De Jong, 2016, Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54, 113, 10.1515/iral-2016-9993 Dell, 2013, The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 1, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0394 Ferreira, 2013, Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction, Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 165, 10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.001 Fine, 2013, Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661 Fox Tree, 1995, The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech, Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709, 10.1006/jmla.1995.1032 Grodner, 2011, The effect of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences, 239 Hanulíková, 2012, When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 878, 10.1162/jocn_a_00103 Hartsuiker, 2010, Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech, Experimental Psychology, 57, 169, 10.1027/1618-3169/a000021 Heller, 2014, Inferring difficulty: Flexibility in the real-time processing of disfluency, Language and Speech Huettig, 2019, Effects of speech rate, preview time of visual context, and participant instructions reveal strong limits on prediction in language processing, Brain Research, 1706, 196, 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.013 Kidd, 2011, Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers’ referential intentions, Developmental Science, 14, 925, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01049.x Kleinschmidt, 2015, Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel, Psychological Review, 122, 148, 10.1037/a0038695 Kraljic, 2008, First impressions and last resorts how listeners adjust to speaker variability, Psychological Science, 19, 332, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x Kurumada, C., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2012). Pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody: It looks like speech adaptation. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (vol. 34). Levelt, 1983, Monitoring and self-repair in speech, Cognition, 14, 41, 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4 McQueen, 2012, Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 509, 10.1121/1.3664087 Mirman, 2008, Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 475, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006 Munro, 1995, Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech, Language and Speech, 38, 289, 10.1177/002383099503800305 Norris, 2003, Perceptual learning in speech, Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204, 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9 Orena, 2015, I forget what that’s called! children’s online processing of disfluencies depends on speaker knowledge, Child Development, 86, 1701, 10.1111/cdev.12421 Owens, 2016, Thee, uhh disfluency effect in preschoolers: A cue to discourse status, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34, 388, 10.1111/bjdp.12137 Owens, 2018, Disfluencies signal reference to novel objects for adults but not children, Journal of Child Language, 45, 581, 10.1017/S0305000917000368 Pickering, 2018, Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review, Psychological Bulletin, 10.1037/bul0000158 Quené, 2010, Non-native durational patterns decrease speech intelligibility, Speech Communication, 52, 911, 10.1016/j.specom.2010.03.005 Quené, 2008, Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413, 10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002 R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program]. Ramscar, 2013, Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech, Language, 89, 760, 10.1353/lan.2013.0068 Saffran, 1996, Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants, Science, 274, 1926, 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 Severens, 2005, Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch, Acta Psychologica, 119, 159, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002 Thacker, 2018, Five-year-olds’ and adults’ use of paralinguistic cues to overcome referential uncertainty, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00143 Thacker, 2018, When it is apt to adapt: Flexible reasoning guides children’s use of talker identity and disfluency cues, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 314, 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.11.008 van Bergen, 2018, Linguistic expectation management in online discourse processing: An investigation of Dutch inderdaad “indeed” and eigenlijk “actually”, Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 191, 10.1016/j.jml.2018.08.004 Van Berkum, 2008, The neural integration of speaker and message, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580, 10.1162/jocn.2008.20054 Van Wijngaarden, 2001, Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech, Speech Communication, 35, 103, 10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00098-4 Watanabe, 2008, Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners, Speech Communication, 50, 81, 10.1016/j.specom.2007.06.002 Yildirim, 2016, Talker-specificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation, Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 128, 10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.003