Counterfactuals, hyperintensionality and Hurford disjunctions
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2009). Counterfactuals, correlatives, and disjunction. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(2), 207–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9059-0.
Anderson, A. R. (1951). A note on subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals. Analysis, 12(2), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/12.2.35.
Chierchia, G. (2006). Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality’’ of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 535–590.
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2009). Hurford’s constraint and the theory of scalar implicatures: Evidence for embedded implicatures. In P. Egré & G. Magri (Eds.), Presuppositions and implicatures: Proceedings of the MIT-Paris workshop (pp. 47–62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ciardelli, I., & Roelofsen, F. (2017). Hurford’s constraint, the semantics of disjunction, and the nature of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics, 25(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9134-y.
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2018). [= Ciardelli et al. (2018a)] Inquisitive semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ciardelli, I., Zhang, L., & Champollion, L. (2018). [= Ciardelli et al. (2018b)] Two switches in the theory of counterfactuals: A study of truth conditionality and minimal change. Linguistics and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-018-9232-4.
Fine, K. (2012). Counterfactuals without possible worlds. Journal of Philosophy, 109(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201210938.
Fine, K. (2017). A theory of truthmaker content I: Conjunction, disjunction and negation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46(6), 625–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-016-9413-y.
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatues. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp. 71–120). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210752_4.
Fox, D., & Hackl, M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(5), 537–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9004-4.
Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2018). Economy and embedded exhaustification. Natural Language Semantics, 26(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9139-6.
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=CtnWAAAAMAAJ
Ginzburg, J. (1996). Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (Eds.), Logic, language, and computation (Vol. 1, pp. 221–237). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1984). On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. In F. Landman & F. Veltman (Eds.), Varieties of formal semantics: Proceedings of the Fourth Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 143–170). Dordrecht: Foris.
Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, 10(1), 41–53.
Hampshire, S. (1948). Subjunctive conditionals. Analysis, 9(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/9.1.9.
Horn, L. (1972). The semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD thesis, Yale University.
Hurford, J. R. (1974). Exclusive or inclusive disjunction. Foundations of Language, 11(3), 409–411.
Katzir, R. (2007). Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(6), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9029-y.
Katzir, R., & Singh, R. (2014). Hurford disjunctions: Embedded exhaustification and structural economy. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 18, 201–216. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/article/view/313.
Khoo, J. (2018). Disjunctive antecedent conditionals. Synthese, 198(8), 7401–7430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1877-6.
Križ, M. (2015). Aspects of homogeneity in the semantics of natural language. PhD thesis, University of Vienna.
Lewis, D. K. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mandelkern, M. (2020). A counterexample to modus ponenses. Journal of Philosophy, 117(6), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2020117619.
Roberts, C. (2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 1–69. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6.
Romoli, J., Santorio, P., & Wittenberg, E. (2022). Alternatives in counterfactuals: What is right and what is not. Journal of Semantics. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab023.
Santorio, P. (2018). Alternatives and truthmakers in conditional semantics. Journal of Philosophy, 115(10), 513–549. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20181151030.
Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(3), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.db.
Schlenker, P. (2004). Conditionals as definite descriptions (a referential analysis). Research on Language and Computation, 2, 417–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-004-0908-2.
Simons, M. (2001). Disjunction and alternativeness. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(5), 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017597811833.
Singh, R. (2008). On the interpretation of disjunction: Asymmetric, incremental, and eager for inconsistency. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9038-x.
Spector, B. (2007). Scalar implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean reasoning. In M. Aloni, A. Butler, & P. Dekker (Eds.), Questions in dynamic semantics (pp. 225–249). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080470993_011.
Stalnaker, R. C. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Studies in logical theory (American Philosophical Monographs 2) (pp. 98–112). Oxford: Blackwell
van Kuppevelt, J. (1996). Inferring from topics: Scalar implicatures as topic-dependent inferences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19(4), 393–443.
van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2004). Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 13(4), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-004-2118-6.
von Fintel, K. (1997). Bare plurals, bare conditionals, and only. Journal of Semantics, 14(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/14.1.1.