Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons

Bulletin of the World Health Organization - Tập 94 Số 12 - Trang 925-930 - 2016
Melanie Bertram1, Jeremy A. Lauer1, Kees de Joncheere1, Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer1, Raymond Hutubessy1, Marie Paule Kiény1, Suzanne Hill1
1World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Marseille, 2015, Thresholds for the cost–effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches., Bull World Health Organ, 93, 118, 10.2471/BLT.14.138206

Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42435/1/924154550X.pdf [cited 2016 Aug 18].

Garber, 1997, Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis., J Health Econ, 16, 1, 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00506-1

Shillcutt, 2009, Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules., Pharmacoeconomics, 27, 903, 10.2165/10899580-000000000-00000

Jamison, 2013, Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation., Lancet, 382, 1898, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62105-4

Hutubessy, 2003, Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis for national-level priority-setting in the health sector., Cost Eff Resour Alloc, 1, 8, 10.1186/1478-7547-1-8

Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94384/1/9789241506236_eng.pdf [cited 2016 Aug 18].

Hutubessy, 2003, Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis for national-level priority-setting in the health sector., Cost Eff Resour Alloc, 1, 8, 10.1186/1478-7547-1-8

Ranking vaccines: a prioritization framework. Phase I: demonstration of concept and a software blueprint. Washington: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 2012. Available from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2012/Ranking-Vaccines-A-Prioritization-Framework-Phase-I.aspx [cited 2016 Mar 15].

Hill, 2000, Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme., JAMA, 283, 2116, 10.1001/jama.283.16.2116

Yong, 2013, The evaluation and use of economic evidence to inform cancer drug reimbursement decisions in Canada., Pharmacoeconomics, 31, 229, 10.1007/s40273-012-0022-5

Hoomans, 2012, Methodological quality of economic evaluations of new pharmaceuticals in the Netherlands., Pharmacoeconomics, 30, 219, 10.2165/11539850-000000000-00000

Oostvogels, 2015, Use of DALYs in economic analyses on interventions for infectious diseases: a systematic review., Epidemiol Infect, 143, 1791, 10.1017/S0950268814001940

Simoens, 2013, Assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations in belgian drug reimbursement applications., PLoS One, 8, e85411, 10.1371/journal.pone.0085411

Williams, 2015, Lonely at the top and stuck in the middle? The ongoing challenge of using cost-effectiveness information in priority setting. Comment on “Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden”., Int J Health Policy Manag, 4, 185, 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.32

Zelle, 2013, Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer control interventions in Peru., PLoS One, 8, e82575, 10.1371/journal.pone.0082575

Chhatwal, 2015, Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States., Ann Intern Med, 162, 397, 10.7326/M14-1336

Petta, 2014, Cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based triple therapy for untreated patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C., Hepatology, 59, 1692, 10.1002/hep.27010

Linas, 2015, The cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens for treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 infection., Ann Intern Med, 162, 619, 10.7326/M14-1313

Meyer-Rath, 2012, The impact and cost of scaling up GeneXpert MTB/RIF in South Africa., PLoS One, 7, e36966, 10.1371/journal.pone.0036966

Creswell, 2014, Results from early programmatic implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF testing in nine countries., BMC Infect Dis, 14, 2, 10.1186/1471-2334-14-2

Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction–GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables., J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 383, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

Schünemann, 2016, GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health., J Clin Epidemiol, S0895-4356(16)00136-0

Norheim, 2014, Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis., Cost Eff Resour Alloc, 12, 18, 10.1186/1478-7547-12-18

Angelis, 2016, Value-based assessment of new medical technologies: towards a robust methodological framework for the application of multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment., Pharmacoeconomics, 34, 435, 10.1007/s40273-015-0370-z

Ottersen, 2016, A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: open and fair., Health Policy, 120, 246, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.012

George, 2001, Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making. Evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996)., Pharmacoeconomics, 19, 1103, 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004

Harris, 2008, The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994-2004., Med Decis Making, 28, 713, 10.1177/0272989X08315247

Jakubiak-Lasocka, 2014, Cost-effectiveness versus cost-utility analyses: what are the motives behind using each and how do their results differ?—A Polish example., Value Health Reg Issues., 4C, 66, 10.1016/j.vhri.2014.06.008

Iyengar, 2016, Prices, costs, and affordability of new medicines for hepatitis C in 30 countries: an economic analysis., PLoS Med, 13, e1002032, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032

Thavorncharoensap, 2013, Estimating the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year in Thailand: does the context of health gain matter?, Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 5, 29, 10.2147/CEOR.S38062

Teerawattananon, 2014, The use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand., Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 108, 397, 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.06.017

Youngkong, 2012, Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit package in Thailand., Value Health, 15, 961, 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.006

Claxton, 2015, Causes for concern: is NICE failing to uphold its responsibilities to all NHS patients?, Health Econ, 24, 1, 10.1002/hec.3130

Claxton, 2015, Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold., Health Technol Assess, 19, 1, 10.3310/hta19140