Cost-effectiveness of radial vs. femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI – Randomized, control trial

Hellenic Journal of Cardiology - Tập 57 - Trang 198-202 - 2016
Łukasz Kołtowski1, Krzysztof J. Filipiak1, Janusz Kochman1, Arkadiusz Pietrasik1, Zenon Huczek1, Pawel Balsam1, Adam Lewandowski1, Karolina Chojnacka1, Grzegorz Opolski1
11st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Dudek, 2013 Task Force on the management of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology, 2012, ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, Eur Heart J, 33, 2569, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215 Mamas, 2012, Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, Heart, 98, 303, 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300558 Spaulding, 1996, Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 39, 365, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199612)39:4<365::AID-CCD8>3.0.CO;2-B Yokoyama, 2000, Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 49, 357, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200004)49:4<357::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-Z Mitchell, 2012, Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 5, 454, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965269 Koltowski, 2014, Access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: radial vs. femoral–a prospective, randomised clinical trial (OCEAN RACE), Kardiol Pol, 72, 604, 10.5603/KP.a2014.0071 Task Force on the management of STseamiotESoC, 2012, ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, Eur Heart J, 33, 2569, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215 Witkowski, 2012, 137 Husereau, 2013, Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement, BMJ, 346, f1049, 10.1136/bmj.f1049 Mann, 2000, Transradial coronary stenting: comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 49, 150, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200002)49:2<150::AID-CCD7>3.0.CO;2-F Roussanov, 2007, Cost-effectiveness of the radial versus femoral artery approach to diagnostic cardiac catheterization, J Invasive Cardiol, 19, 349 Applegate, 2013, Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 82, E375 Safley, 2013, Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database, American Heart Journal, 165, 303, 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.004 Cooper, 1999, Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison, Am Heart J, 138, 430, 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70143-2 Joyal, 2012, Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention, Am J Cardiol, 109, 813, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.007 Athyros, 2011, Is there an additional benefit from coronary revascularization in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable angina who are already on optimal medical treatment?, Arch Med Sci, 7, 1067, 10.5114/aoms.2011.26621