Cost-effectiveness of introducing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the management of complex phalangeal fractures: economic simulation

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY - Tập 106 - Trang 169-177 - 2020
N. Faccioli1, E. Santi1, G. Foti2, G. Mansueto1, M. Corain3
1Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
2IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy
3Hand Surgery Department, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the management of the complex finger fractures with articular involvement. We created a decision tree model simulating the diagnostic pathway of complex finger fractures, suggesting the use of CBCT as alternative to multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), and we compared their clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients. Measures of effectiveness are analysed by using quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net monetary benefit. Diagnosis of a complex finger fracture performed with CBCT costed 67.33€ per patient, yielded 9.08 quality-adjusted life years, and gained an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 29.94€ and a net monetary benefit of 9.07 € at 30,000€ threshold. Using MSCT for diagnosis costed 106.23 €, yielded 8.18 quality-adjusted life years, and gained an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 371.15 € and a net monetary benefit of 8.09 €. CBCT strategy dominated the MSCT strategy. The acceptability curve shows that there is 98% probability of CBCT being the optimal strategy at 30,000€ threshold (1 EUR equal to 1.11 USD; updated on 02/02/2020). CBCT in complex finger fractures management is cost saving compared with MSCT and may be considered a valuable imaging tool in preoperative assessment, allowing early detection and appropriate treatment. It shortens the time to completion of diagnostic work-up, reduces the number of additional diagnostic procedures, improves quality of life, and may reduce costs in a societal perspective.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC (2011) The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. Hand 7:18–22 Giustini M, de Leo A, Leti AA et al (2015) Incidence estimates of hand and upper extremity injuries in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanità 51:305–312 Dean BJF, Little C (2011) Fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges. Orthop Trauma 25:43–56 Anakwe RE, Aitken SA, Cowie JG et al (2011) The epidemiology of fractures of the hand and the influence of social deprivation. J Hand Surg Eur 36:62–65 Warrender WJ, Henstenburg J, Maltenfort M et al (2018) Seasonal variation in the prevalence of common orthopaedic upper extremity conditions. J Wrist Surg 7:232–236 Taghinia AH, Talbot SG (2019) Phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Clin Plast Surg 46:415–423 Wong VW, Higgins JP (2017) Evidence-based medicine: management of metacarpal fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:140e–151e Prucz RB, Friedrich JB (2015) Finger joint injuries. Clin Sports Med 34:99–116 Shaftel ND, Capo JT (2014) Fractures of the digits and metacarpals: when to splint and when to repair? Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 22:2–11 Gajendran VK, Malone KJ (2015) Management of complications with hand fractures. Hand Clin 31:165–177 Oak N, Lawton JN (2013) Intra-articular fractures of the hand. Hand Clin 29:535–549 Ben-Amotz O, Sammer DM (2015) Practical management of metacarpal fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:370–379 Elfar J, Mann T (2013) Fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:88–98 Wieschhoff GG, Sheehan SE, Wortman JR et al (2016) Traumatic finger injuries: what the orthopedic surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 36:1106–1128 Sundaram N, Bosley J, Stacy GS (2013) Conventional radiographic evaluation of athletic injuries to the hand. Radiol Clin North Am 51:239–255 Torabi M, Lenchik L, Beaman FD et al (2019) ACR appropriateness criteria® acute hand and wrist trauma. J Am Coll Radiol 16:S7–S17 De Smet E, De Praeter G, Verstraete KLA et al (2015) Direct comparison of conventional radiography and cone-beam CT in small bone and joint trauma. Skeletal Radiol 44:1111–1117 Faccioli N, Foti G, Barillari M et al (2010) Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of CBCT and multislice computed tomography. Skelet Radiol 39:1087–1095 Dubreuil T, Mouly J, Ltaief-Boudrigua A et al (2019) Comparison of CBCT and multislice computed tomography in the assessment of extremity fractures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 43:372–378 Ilica AT, Ozyurek S, Kose O et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and negative radiographic examinations. Jpn J Radiol 29:98–103 Ahlawat S, Corl FM, Fishman EK et al (2015) MDCT of the hand and wrist: beyond trauma. Emerg Radiol 22:307–314 De Charry C, Boutroy S, Ellouz R et al (2016) Clinical cone beam computed tomography compared to high-resolution peripheral computed tomography in the assessment of distal radius bone. Osteoporos Int 27:3073–3082 American College of Radiology (2019) ACR Appropriateness Criteria Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Appropriateness-Criteria/RadiationDoseAssessment Intro.pdf. Accessed Jun 16, 2019. Koivisto J, Kiljunen T, Kadesjö N et al (2015) Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region. J Foot Ankle Res 8:8 Posadzy M, Desimpel J, Vanhoenacker F (2018) Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications. Insights Imaging 9:35–45 Zbijewski W, De Jean P, Prakash P et al (2011) A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Med Phys 38:4700–4713 Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A et al (2016) Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 316:1093–1103 Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Communities, Labour market statistics. Luxembourg, 2011. Issue number 48/2012. Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Weinstein MC (2014) Updating cost-effectiveness—the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med 371(9):796–797 Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:349–362 Zyluk A, Budzynski T (2009) Conservative vs operative treatment of isolated fractures of phalanges: results of the prospective, randomized study. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 74:74–78 Costa ML, Achten J, Plant C et al (2015) UK DRAFFT - a randomised controlled trial of percutaneous fixation with kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius. Health Technol Assess 19:1–124 Gruppo di lavoro misto SIRM-SNR (2006) Metodologia di determinazione dei volumi di attività e della produttività dei medici radiologi. Omicron Ed (Genova) Cohen DJ, Reynolds MR (2008) Interpreting the results of cost-effectiveness studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2119–2126 Kadom N, Itri JN, Trofimova A et al (2019) Cost-Effectiveness analysis: an overview of key concepts, recommendations, controversies, and pitfalls. Acad Radiol 26:534–541 National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) (2019) Fractures (Complex): Assessment and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2016 Feb. (NICE Guideline, No. 37.) Appendix L, Cost analysis for open fractures. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK344250/ Visited 15/04/2019 National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) (2016) Fractures (Non-Complex): Assessment and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2016 Feb. (NICE Guideline, No. 38.) Appendix M, Cost-effectiveness analysis: Imaging of suspected scaphoid fractures. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368138/ Visited 15/04/2019 Huang AJ, Chang CY, Thomas BJ et al (2015) Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects. Skeletal Radiol 44:797–809 Kröpil P, Hakimi AR, Jungbluth P et al (2012) Cone beam CT in assessment of tibial bone defect healing: an animal study. Acad Radiol 19:320–325