Cost comparison of patients with 3-level artificial total lumbar disc replacements versus 360° fusion at 3 contiguous lumbar vertebral levels: an analysis of compassionate use at 1 site of the US investigational device exemption clinical trial

SAS Journal - Tập 4 - Trang 107-114 - 2010
Frank A. Buttacavoli1, Rick B. Delamarter1, Linda E.A. Kanim1
1Cedars-Sinai Spine Center and The Spine Institute, Los Angeles, CA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Weinstein, 2006, United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003, Spine, 31, 2707, 10.1097/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe Luo, 2003, Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29, 79, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000105527.13866.0F Dagenais, 2007, A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally, Spine J, 8, 8, 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005 Levin, 2007, Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 2905, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b84ae Fritzell, 2004, Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish lumbar spine study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar study group, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29, 421, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000102681.61791.12 Enker, 1994, Interbody fusion and instrumentation, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 300, 90, 10.1097/00003086-199403000-00011 Periasamy, 2008, Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cages, combined with instrumented posterolateral fusion: a study of 75 cases, Acta Orthop Belg, 74, 240 Swan, 2006, Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion, Spine J, 6, 606, 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.032 Soegaard, 2007, Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 2405, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573b2d Gray, 2006, Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31, 1957, 10.1097/01.brs.0000229148.63418.c1 Katz, 2006, Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 21, 10.2106/JBJS.E.01273 Deyo, 2005, United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 1441, 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a Guyer, 2007, An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion, Spine J, 7, 558, 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.09.006 Zigler, 2007, Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 1155, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 Schafer, 2007, Medicare evidence development and coverage advisory committee meeting on lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of chronic back pain from degenerative disc disease, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 2403, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573841 Haldeman, 2007, What have we learned about the evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain?, Spine J, 8, 266, 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.026 Delamarter, 2003, ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 28, S167, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092220.66650.2B