Các thiên lệch phụ thuộc vào độ trễ tương ứng trong ngôn ngữ không gian và trí nhớ không gian

Amari, S. (1977). Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27, 77–87. Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 126–145. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9–42). New York: Cambridge University Press. Brungart, D. S., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Durlach, N. I. (2000). Evaluation of response methods for the localization of nearby objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(1), 48–65. Crawford, L. E., Regier, T., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization. Cognition, 75(3), 209–235. Erlhagen, W., & Schöner, G. (2002). Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review, 109, 545–572. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55. Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (1995). Spatial language and spatial representation. Cognition, 55, 39–84. Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208–217. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., & Prohaska, V. (1988). Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review, 95, 471–484. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgement? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220–241. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75–97. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. N. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 359–368. Lipinski, J., Spencer J. P., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009a). It’s in the eye of the beholder: Spatial language and spatial memory use the same perceptual reference frames. In L. B. Smith, M. Gasser & K. Mix (Eds.), The spatial foundations of language. Oxford University Press (in press). Lipinski, J., Spencer, J. P., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009b). Towards the integration of linguistic and non-linguistic spatial cognition: a dynamic field theory approach. In J. Mayor, N. Ruh, & K. Plunkett (Eds.), Progress in neural processing 18. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop, Oxford, UK (pp. 205–216). Singapore: World Scientific. Logan, G. D., & Sadler, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (Language, Speech, and Communication) (pp. 493–529). Cambridge: MIT Press. Munnich, E., Landau, B., & Dosher, B. (2001). Spatial language and spatial representation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81, 171–207. Palmer, S. E., & Hemenway, K. (1978). Orientation and symmetry: Effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 691–702. Schöner, G. (2008). Dynamical systems approaches to cognition. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 101–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds’ delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73, 377–404. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009a). Filling the gap on developmental change: Tests of a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition (submitted). Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009b). Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: Capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (in press). Schutte, A. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2003). Testing the dynamic field theory: Working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. Child Development, 74(5), 1393–1417. Simmering, V. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose arbitrary spatial category boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 33, 871–894. Simmering, V. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2008). Generality with specificity: The dynamic field theory genearlizes across tasks and time scales. Developmental Science, 11, 541–555. Simmering, V. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2009). Creating and destroying reference frames in spatial working memory (in preparation). Simmering, V. S., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2006). Reference-related inhibition produces enhanced position discrimination and fast repulsion near axes of symmetry. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 1027–1046. Simmering, V. S., Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2008). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales. Brain Research, 1202, 68–86. Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16–37. Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2003). Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall. Cognitive Psychology, 47(4), 432–480. Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. S., Schutte, A. R., & Schöner, G. (2007). What does theoretical neuroscience have to offer the study of behavioral development? Insights from a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), Emerging landscapes of mind: Mapping the nature of change in spatial cognition (pp. 320–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press. van der Zee, E., & Slack, J. (Eds.). (2003). Representing direction in language and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wenderoth, P. (1994). The salience of vertical symmetry. Perception, 23, 221–236. Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal, 12, 1–12. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 44 (pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.