Correlation of current myocardial perfusion imaging and previous coronary angiography to avert the need for repeat intervention – A case report

Al Aloul, 2012, Utility of nuclear stress imaging for detecting coronary artery bypass graft disease, BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 3, 62, 10.1186/1471-2261-12-62 Hachamovitch, 2003, Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography, Circulation, 107, 2900, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41 Maron, 2020, Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease, N Engl J Med, 382, 1395, 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922 Udelson, 2002, Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 288, 2693, 10.1001/jama.288.21.2693 de Winter, 2022, Diagnostic and management strategies in patients with late recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass grafting, Curr Cardiol Rep, 24, 1309, 10.1007/s11886-022-01746-w Mansour, 2023, Multi-center study of inter-rater reproducibility, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy of CZT versus conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, J Nucl Cardiol, 30, 528, 10.1007/s12350-022-03054-w