Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography

Yaffe MJ (2008) Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 10:209

Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ et al (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126

Oza AM, Boyd NF (1993) Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 15:196–208

Saftlas AF, Szklo M (1987) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 9:146–174

Warner E, Lockwood G, Tritchler D, Boyd NF (1992) The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev 16:67–72

Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR et al (1998) Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 209:511–518

Bartella L, Smith CS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2007) Imaging breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 45:45–67

Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18:1307–1318

Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849

Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742

Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WG Jr et al (2001) International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 11:531–546

Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378

Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J et al (1997) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical phase dependency. Radiology 203:137–144

Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110

Daniel BL, Yen YF, Glover GH et al (1998) Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology 209:499–509

Delille JP, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED et al (2005) Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging—initial observations. Radiology 235:36–41

Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier T et al (2002) Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. Radiology 224:881–888

Morris EA (2007) Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Radiol Clin North Am 45:863–880

Delille JP, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED et al (2005) Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue. Breast J 11:236–241

Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P et al (1997) Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 203:145–149

American College of Radiology (2003) ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS): breast imaging atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology.

Kerlikowski K, Grady D, Barclay J et al (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33–38

Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199

Stomper PC, D’souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA (1996) Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353women 25–79 years old. Am J Roentgenol AJR 167:1261–1265

Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A; Italian Trial for Breast MR in Multifocal/Multicentric Cancer (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgenol AJR 183:1149–1157

Sardanelli F, Bacigalupo L, Carbonaro L et al (2008) What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard? Radiol Med 113:439–451

Heywang-Kobrunner SH (1994) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol 29:94–104

Heywang KS (1993) Brustkrebsdiagnostik mit MR: ueberblick nach 1250 Patientenuntersuchungen. Electromedia 61:43–52

Quan ML, Sclafani L, Heerdt AS et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging detects unsuspected disease in patients with invasive lobular cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1048–1053

Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ (2003) Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:32–37

Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R et al (2001) MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:399–406

Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R et al (2002) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and singlestage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 89:1296–1301