Correlation between Journal Impact Factor and Citation Performance: An experimental study

Journal of Informetrics - Tập 7 - Trang 357-370 - 2013
Ugo Finardi1,2
1CNR-CERIS, National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth, via Real Collegio, 30, I-10024 Moncalieri (TO), Italy
2University of Torino, Department of Chemistry and NIS-Centre of Excellence, via P. Giuria, 7, I-10125 Torino, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Albarrán, 2011, References made and citations received by scientific articles, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 40, 10.1002/asi.21448 Albarrán, 2010, A comparison of the scientific performance of the U.S. and the European Union at the turn of the 21st century, Scientometrics, 85, 329, 10.1007/s11192-010-0223-7 Amez, 2012, Citation measures at the micro level: Influence of publication age, field, and uncitedness, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1459, 10.1002/asi.22687 Archambault, 2009, History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences, Scientometrics, 79, 635, 10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x Balaban, 2012, Positive and negative aspects of citation indices and journal impact factor, Scientometrics, 92, 241, 10.1007/s11192-012-0637-5 Bensman, 2007, Garfield and the impact factor, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93, 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410110 Bensman, S.J. (2007). Garfield and the Impact Factor: The creation, utilization, and validation of a citation measure: Part 2, The probabilistic, statistical, and sociological bases of the measure, unpublished, available at: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/bensman/bensmanegif22007.pdf (accessed December 2012). Bensman, 2012, The impact factor: Its place in Garfield's thought, in science evaluation, and in library collection management, Scientometrics, 92, 263, 10.1007/s11192-011-0601-9 Campanario, 2012, Some research ideas on Journal Impact Factor as a crucial topic in science dynamics, Scientometrics, 92, 293, 10.1007/s11192-012-0650-8 Fieller, 1961, Tests for rank correlation coefficients. II, Biometrika, 48, 29, 10.2307/2333127 Fieller, 1957, Tests for rank correlation coefficients. I, Biometrika, 44, 470, 10.2307/2332878 Fisher, 1915, Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population, Biometrika, 10, 507 Fisher, 1921, On the “Probable Error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample, Metron, I, 3 Franceschet, 2010, Journal influence factors, Journal of Informetrics, 4, 239, 10.1016/j.joi.2009.12.002 Garfield, 1955, Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science, 122, 108, 10.1126/science.122.3159.108 Garfield, 1972, Citation analysis as a tool for journal evaluation, Science, 178, 471, 10.1126/science.178.4060.471 Garfield Garfield, 1997, The impact factor and using it correctly, Der Unfallchirurg, 48, 413 Garfield, 2005, The agony and the ecstasy – The history and meaning of the journal impact factor Garfield, 2006, The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90, 10.1001/jama.295.1.90 Garfield, 1963, New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing, American Documentation, 14, 195, 10.1002/asi.5090140304 Garfield, 1966, New tools for improving and evaluating the effectiveness of research, 135 Glänzel, 2009, Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance, Scientometrics, 78, 165, 10.1007/s11192-008-2109-5 Herranz, 2012, Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 543, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.02.006 Howell, 2010 Ingwersen, 2012, The pragmatics of a diachronic journal impact factor, Scientometrics, 92, 319, 10.1007/s11192-012-0701-1 Leydesdorff, 2006, Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal–journal citation relations using the journal citation reports?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 601, 10.1002/asi.20322 Leydesdorff, 2008, Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 278, 10.1002/asi.20743 Liang, L., Rousseau, R., Zhong, Z. (2012), Non-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: Bias in citations? Scientometrics, in press. Moed, 2010, Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, Journal of Informetrics, 4, 265, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002 Moed, 2012, Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way, Scientometrics, 92, 367, 10.1007/s11192-012-0679-8 Mutz, 2012, Skewed citation distribution and bias factor: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factor, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 169, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.12.006 Pearson, 1962, Tests for rank correlation coefficients. III. Distribution of the Transformed Kendall coefficient, Biometrika, 49, 185, 10.2307/2333480 Pendlebury, 2009, The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57, 1, 10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y Pendlebury, 2012, Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor, Scientometrics, 92, 395, 10.1007/s11192-012-0689-6 Potì, 2012, The different impact on scientific output of academic-owned vs. academic-invented patents: Evidence from a panel of Italian academic inventors, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 64, 433, 10.1504/IJBIR.2012.047276 Rousseau, 2012, Updating the journal impact factor or total overhaul?, Scientometrics, 92, 413, 10.1007/s11192-012-0649-1 Seglen, 1994, Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<1::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-Y Seglen, 1997, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, 314, 498, 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 2006, The impact factor game, PLoS Medicine, 3 van Leeuwen, 2012, Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: Revision of earlier comments, Scientometrics, 92, 443, 10.1007/s11192-012-0677-x Vanclay, 2009, Bias in the journal impact factor, Scientometrics, 78, 3, 10.1007/s11192-008-1778-4 Vanclay, 2011, Impact factor: Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?, Scientometrics, 92, 211, 10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0 Vieira, 2010, Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features, Journal of Informetrics, 4, 1, 10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002 Vinkler, 2003, Relations of relative scientometric indicators, Scientometrics, 58, 687, 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006888.69146.24 Vinkler, 2009, Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals, Scientometrics, 79, 409, 10.1007/s11192-009-0427-x Vinkler, 2012, The Garfield impact factor, one of the fundamental indicators in scientometrics, Scientometrics, 92, 471, 10.1007/s11192-012-0688-7 Vinkler, 2012, The case of scientometricians with the “absolute relative” impact indicator, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 254, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.12.004 Wessa, P. (2012). Free statistics software, office for research development and education, version 1.1.23-r7, URL http://www.wessa.net/. Wilhite, 2012, Coercive citation in academic publishing, Science, 335, 542, 10.1126/science.1212540 Wu, 2013, Investigating the universal distribution of normalized indicators and developing field-independent index, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 63, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.08.007